Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Today at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Jun 25, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
ElaKiri.com
News and Updates
Video - Pfizer vaccine distribution logistics
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 25938089" data-attributes="member: 562115"><p>Sorry didn't have time in the morning...As you said there are many opinions. The ex-Pfizer scientist raised concerns over pregnancy. That affects only the females and if I can get any shot, I will sure go for it. I need to stay safe first. Who knows, may be we will need repeat doses till this dreaded disease gets wiped out.</p><p></p><p>Pfizer-BioNTech - mRNA based</p><p>Moderna - mRNA based</p><p>Astra Zeneca (Uni of Oxford) - adenovirus based</p><p>J&J - adenovirus based</p><p>Sputnik V - adenovirus based</p><p>China's SinoVac followed the established method of inactivated virus and CanSino went on ahead with adenovirus based.</p><p></p><p>There are so many others in line. Each of these technologies have pros & cons. It's difficult to pitch one against the other. Why some scientists are worried is that there can be some cocerns with adenovirus based vaccines if not tested over long term. I mentioned this in another thread explaining why vaccine tests usually takes years. An experimental HIV vaccine developed by a US company had to be withdrawn because some researchers found that it actually raised the risk of HIV infection in some people. It took an year for this to surface, in fact nearly <strong>18 months</strong>. The adenovirus is used as a vector and the failed HIV vaccine used an engineered strain known as adenovirus 5 (Ad5)</p><p>The Cansino vaccine uses Ad5, the Russian one uses two vectors Ad5 and Ad26. Hence scientists are questioning as to why they still stick with Ad5 rather than going for another one when there are so many alternatives.</p><p>To their defence the Russians argue that they used this for their Ebola vaccine platform and no harmful results were noticed and hence it's safe. China's Cansino also has a Ad5 based Ebola vaccine. Both of these used the established platform to modify it for Covid 19.</p><p></p><p>I believe this Ad5 issue is why the Oxford Scientists chose another adenovirus vector. They used a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1.</p><p>Hope this helps....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="imhotep, post: 25938089, member: 562115"] Sorry didn't have time in the morning...As you said there are many opinions. The ex-Pfizer scientist raised concerns over pregnancy. That affects only the females and if I can get any shot, I will sure go for it. I need to stay safe first. Who knows, may be we will need repeat doses till this dreaded disease gets wiped out. Pfizer-BioNTech - mRNA based Moderna - mRNA based Astra Zeneca (Uni of Oxford) - adenovirus based J&J - adenovirus based Sputnik V - adenovirus based China's SinoVac followed the established method of inactivated virus and CanSino went on ahead with adenovirus based. There are so many others in line. Each of these technologies have pros & cons. It's difficult to pitch one against the other. Why some scientists are worried is that there can be some cocerns with adenovirus based vaccines if not tested over long term. I mentioned this in another thread explaining why vaccine tests usually takes years. An experimental HIV vaccine developed by a US company had to be withdrawn because some researchers found that it actually raised the risk of HIV infection in some people. It took an year for this to surface, in fact nearly [B]18 months[/B]. The adenovirus is used as a vector and the failed HIV vaccine used an engineered strain known as adenovirus 5 (Ad5) The Cansino vaccine uses Ad5, the Russian one uses two vectors Ad5 and Ad26. Hence scientists are questioning as to why they still stick with Ad5 rather than going for another one when there are so many alternatives. To their defence the Russians argue that they used this for their Ebola vaccine platform and no harmful results were noticed and hence it's safe. China's Cansino also has a Ad5 based Ebola vaccine. Both of these used the established platform to modify it for Covid 19. I believe this Ad5 issue is why the Oxford Scientists chose another adenovirus vector. They used a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1. Hope this helps.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom