Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 27010379" data-attributes="member: 562115">It says Cheap Fertilizer... but doesn't say how cheap. In India it's only 10% cheaper than an equivalent sack of urea, but the advantage is in the absorption. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite22" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up    (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />Pls refer to my previous post copied below...."One 500ml bottle of nano-urea can replace one 45kg bag of conventional urea. About 30% to 50% of conventional urea does not get absorbed and hence wasted. But a nano urea liquid particle is 30 nanometre and compared to the conventional granular urea it has about 10,000 times more surface area to volume size. Due to the ultra-small size and surface properties, the nano urea liquid gets absorbed by plants more effectively when sprayed on their leaves.This is what the Indian sources say."PS: Only saw about the patent being sold to India... Anyone has proof of this? Who bought it?  Any details welcome.She currently holds the patent indicated below.<a href="https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f7/39/2d/a03ffec7491384/US8696784.pdf" target="_blank">https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f7/39/2d/a03ffec7491384/US8696784.pdf</a>Ramesh Raliya hold a different patent...<a href="https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018005930A1/en" target="_blank">https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018005930A1/en</a>It's a very sad scenario when we cannot market our own inventions.... <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/sad.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Sad    :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom