Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Anusha" data-source="post: 833842" data-attributes="member: 828">You are the one who don't want to read an explanation, saying it's too long....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" />  You are really funny. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />  Tell us one good reason why you think WinRAR is better, except the fact that you THINK most people use it.  1. I've shown7-zip compressed certain files at 3-10 times faster on a 64bit platform and faster in 32bit platform as well, but not as much as in 64bit. What more do you need? It's not compressing only that matters. Every archive I download, extracts faster in 7-zip. Only time when WinRAR and 7-zip performance is equal is when I extract a 700MB movie, because the hard disk has a lot to do in that case.  2. 7-zip is free (maybe not a big importance)  3. 7-zip one of the few (3?) archivers that natively comes in 64bit</blockquote>

Top Bottom