Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet
Romeshka
Updated:
Yesterday at 12:16 AM
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Jul 2, 2026
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Jul 1, 2026
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
What is better: an experiment with winrar winzip and 7zip
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="coolioWiZ" data-source="post: 840046" data-attributes="member: 40999"><p>This is getting interesting. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p>for no 1 : This time I was not trying to show compression sizes. You'll see that the focus is on the speed. I can show that .7z is also faster than rar. zip is the default compression used by windows users. So it's quite reasonable to test 7zip and winzip for it. (a windows user might like to know how well .zip is handled by these programs)</p><p></p><p>for no 2: I didn't say I believe. It's an <strong>observation</strong>. Watch the videos.</p><p></p><p>for no 3 and 4: Not statistics, <strong>show benchmarks</strong>. Don't screw up. Show some screencasts. If they are <strong>authentic</strong> I'll then believe.</p><p></p><p>Now for your side remark: I didn't say anything about kicking 2 people at the same time. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> I don't act as a stunt double for Jackie Chan. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P :P" data-shortname=":P" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="coolioWiZ, post: 840046, member: 40999"] This is getting interesting. :lol: for no 1 : This time I was not trying to show compression sizes. You'll see that the focus is on the speed. I can show that .7z is also faster than rar. zip is the default compression used by windows users. So it's quite reasonable to test 7zip and winzip for it. (a windows user might like to know how well .zip is handled by these programs) for no 2: I didn't say I believe. It's an [B]observation[/B]. Watch the videos. for no 3 and 4: Not statistics, [B]show benchmarks[/B]. Don't screw up. Show some screencasts. If they are [B]authentic[/B] I'll then believe. Now for your side remark: I didn't say anything about kicking 2 people at the same time. :lol: I don't act as a stunt double for Jackie Chan. :P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom