Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
What Processor Brand will you choose as your next upgrade
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zCexVe" data-source="post: 2097100" data-attributes="member: 3878"><p>Well Anusha ppl have different thoughts.This is my point of view.I have somw different way of looking into things,pardon on that but just read it.</p><p>When AMD beat Intel hell out with the Athlon 64 core using LDT(HT),and IMC Intel wanted to come on top coz frankly they were going sales down rapidly.They needed a huge improvement over the core coz they never thought of that much competition from a company like AMD.Reaching higher clocks with what they had was impossible.But you cant give up coz you are intel,you need to keep it up.I have money,hell load but I cant have technology.SO quickest solution is to move to lesser nm tech,just to get the clocks higher and keep it up.And that time will be used for new tech.So then came the Core 2 line up from that time.But still the MCH+FSB.Then lucky for them AMD just went with new inventions considering far long term gains,which they will have in their predicted road map up until 2011.HT3.0,AM3 etc.But Intel got a lot time from core2 conroe,but still they were not finished with quick path(sad to say still 10GB/S slower at a link than HT)and IMC like AMD.Also the native quad L3 cache and things.Things were going again bad for Intel although sales were good,So came into 45nm and planned for 32nm-You pay us a lot <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P :P" data-shortname=":P" />-now they got more time and will release AIO package with nehalem hopefully will come by par with AMD technologies.Still AMD gains juice from 65nm,If they move into full time 45nm and as predicted,more into 32nm directly,AMD can beat Intel as they have technology at top notch.But still sadly AMD thought of intergrating GPU into CPU a whole new side and currently have research on it.This will look more brighter for them as I'm sure it will not be on X86,which they still pay Intel for that.Just my 0.02.</p><p>Edit:I just realized how sad it is to think about a CPU IRL ,more than the engineers at Intel or AMD.<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P :P" data-shortname=":P" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zCexVe, post: 2097100, member: 3878"] Well Anusha ppl have different thoughts.This is my point of view.I have somw different way of looking into things,pardon on that but just read it. When AMD beat Intel hell out with the Athlon 64 core using LDT(HT),and IMC Intel wanted to come on top coz frankly they were going sales down rapidly.They needed a huge improvement over the core coz they never thought of that much competition from a company like AMD.Reaching higher clocks with what they had was impossible.But you cant give up coz you are intel,you need to keep it up.I have money,hell load but I cant have technology.SO quickest solution is to move to lesser nm tech,just to get the clocks higher and keep it up.And that time will be used for new tech.So then came the Core 2 line up from that time.But still the MCH+FSB.Then lucky for them AMD just went with new inventions considering far long term gains,which they will have in their predicted road map up until 2011.HT3.0,AM3 etc.But Intel got a lot time from core2 conroe,but still they were not finished with quick path(sad to say still 10GB/S slower at a link than HT)and IMC like AMD.Also the native quad L3 cache and things.Things were going again bad for Intel although sales were good,So came into 45nm and planned for 32nm-You pay us a lot :P-now they got more time and will release AIO package with nehalem hopefully will come by par with AMD technologies.Still AMD gains juice from 65nm,If they move into full time 45nm and as predicted,more into 32nm directly,AMD can beat Intel as they have technology at top notch.But still sadly AMD thought of intergrating GPU into CPU a whole new side and currently have research on it.This will look more brighter for them as I'm sure it will not be on X86,which they still pay Intel for that.Just my 0.02. Edit:I just realized how sad it is to think about a CPU IRL ,more than the engineers at Intel or AMD.:P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Asuwa dahayen wadi kalama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom