Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fallenzeraphine" data-source="post: 2097639" data-attributes="member: 76400"><p>well, u guys have some points, yes intel's Core 2 is faster even on a old Technology such as FSB simply because core2s have superior performing architecture than a K8, and simply none of these processors can utilize the full bandwidth of a HT bus completely. but my point is that AMD took that step, they pushed the envelope, i admire that quality of AMD, but as i see it AMD had one weakness after they created the highly successfull K8, they kinda forgot intel will strike back, the work on their new processor archtecture was slow, and when intel relased core 2, everything got really dark for AMD, they were just out resourced by intel, K10 is just a extention to K8 its not a new architechture at all, and AMD couldnt move to new fabrication processes cuz simply they dont have the resources to do so, but i like the spirit of AMD they were allways under pressure frm intel, and they always managed to bring out some quality product to push the envelope, i think AMD always made intel to create new processor archtechtures all along, even now AMD has really promising plans for the future like the Fusion processor, but its sad to see them go down, they are having a hard time right now, the Phenom was late and it cant go neck to neck with core 2, and they never had enough time or money to create a new architechture, im hoping the 45nm K10.1 parts will shed some light on AMD, untill they relase the all new Bulldozer architechture.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom