Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Sunday at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
Whats better OCed? 45nm 1333 or 65nm 1066
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zCexVe" data-source="post: 945894" data-attributes="member: 3878"><p>This goes to Intel Overclockerz........</p><p>As I was thinking of OCing with the latest 45nm CPUs I got to that it'll do OC better with lower TDP,much space things.But since its 333 base rather than 266 base (67 more) we get less FSB to OC right?.Coz whether its 1333 or 1066 our mobos have the same max FSBs.</p><p>And then again Its their performance as shown below is different.So when the things OCed to same, the performance will be more in 45nm.The below images are from XS.</p><p><img src="http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3344/attachmentjs8.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/3474/16132825092007core20frezg5.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8564/45uo6vk3.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>whatcha gonna do? 45 or 65nm.Remember that a Q6600 is 270$ retail.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zCexVe, post: 945894, member: 3878"] This goes to Intel Overclockerz........ As I was thinking of OCing with the latest 45nm CPUs I got to that it'll do OC better with lower TDP,much space things.But since its 333 base rather than 266 base (67 more) we get less FSB to OC right?.Coz whether its 1333 or 1066 our mobos have the same max FSBs. And then again Its their performance as shown below is different.So when the things OCed to same, the performance will be more in 45nm.The below images are from XS. [IMG]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3344/attachmentjs8.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/3474/16132825092007core20frezg5.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8564/45uo6vk3.jpg[/IMG] whatcha gonna do? 45 or 65nm.Remember that a Q6600 is 270$ retail. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom