Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="just" data-source="post: 1080934" data-attributes="member: 61659">Science is basically about cause and affect right? buddism misses this point in one hand at the same time uses it as one of the main arguments to explain its philosophy. it says every living creature will be be "incarnated" and will get a life according what it did in previouse life (thats the essence of buddism.correct me if im wrong) so thats cause and effect. but what it misses is to expalin, what/who causes this process to be an unfair one (if this actually exists is a different problem). often this part is unclear but you dont have to be a rocket scientist to figure that if at all this choosing the good and giving them a good life and choosing the bad and giving them wat they deserve cannot happen without nothing. i can explain further if you need.also the basic stuff like food chain and struggle for power are basis of modern science.science says world exists cos of this cycles and if its damaged then unbalance will distroy everything.also this celebreties and popular people admireiring buddism (they r not buddist they just pick small peaces becouse movie stars they live a 90% life which completely agains any religion or even common morals. if you watch news you know) its cos they in one extrem and they just want somethin to fill there spiritual side like every human being.and buddsim has an advantage you dont have to declare or commit. i think thats the reason still you guys can tell your idea'sand for this over the science thing. yeah i agree science is not all knowing and all correct. if not it will becom more popular than religions.but this miracle performing part seeing deeper meenings hasnt helped rather than for indiduals. its not easy to bring up a community society based on this. best example is our country wil 2500 yrs of history. what has if developed in common man. its still a country with country with liqure bars, brothel houses, drug dealers, bribary, undeciplined youth, high divorce rates,no family value..etc etc can make a long list.i think actually buddism is unpopular cos its a philosophy that can only implemented in very small crowd of people or really individually.it cannot be bought into a vast papulation as general set of rules to build a community. if you think its wrong think about this. budda decided to goto it after thinking of politics (he was a prince) family (he left it if im correct) etc etc and all other social structures. and last he came to conclution its not gona help and go indidual.all this people who call them buddist are not practicing even 1% of wat he intended to teach (im not really sure intentded to teach...) they are just studying the philosopy and applying it in their own way.and being proud of it..but i just wonder isnt buddism that budda practiced is something going way of pride?</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom