Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 7718613" data-attributes="member: 262433">I know this. There was an agenda behind my question. Before I ask about a verse from quran, most of the time I look at the history, story and hadiths related to that verse. I know perfectly well, the historical context behind the verse I mentioned. The reason I asked the question was to explore whether I_Love_SriLanka consider hadiths as authentic sources or not. Because some people does not. They only rely on quran.This is what I believe as well. I think hadiths complete the meaning of the quran and to truely understand it hadiths are really important. I mentioned diamonddrago does not consider hadiths as authentic sources. I was not talking about muslims as a whole. If you go back to the post you'll see I was addressing him.I agree.If you are trying to make a point here, I must say your attempt is poor. Prophet migrated to madeena because he was evicted meccans. But the verse I mentioned has nothing to do with a defensive act. I studied the historical background and hadiths before bringing it up. I'm not sure whether I have it wrong or your have it wrong. But it was clear to me that the verse I mentioned was spoken by Muhammad to his followers to motivate them in to raiding meccan caravans. I see no defensive act in it, it is offensive. Also it seems this was done during holy months where meccan merchants were not expecting an attack and were probably unarmed. The verse tallies perfectly with this historical background. This story is long and continuing. But I'm just interested to know where I have made a mistake. It is possible because I use internet as my source. Please come forward with hadiths and other sources to explain relation between killing of unarmed muslims and the particular verse I mentioned.</blockquote>

Verification: Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)

Top Bottom