Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Sunday at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Saturday at 8:07 AM
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Why Don't Black Holes Swallow All of Space?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lovethebomb" data-source="post: 26822769" data-attributes="member: 531830"><p>You need AdS CFT to make this speculation work. That's where I get a little less enthusiastic.</p><p></p><p>Also, this question: “why aren’t BHs expanding invasively?” always sounded off to me. Yes, the universe is quite old but BHs do not suck matter into them so ubiquitously. On top of that they can also decrease mass by way of radiation. So to say that BHs should be overbearingly large now is akin to saying that night sky should be brutally incandescent because there are immensely many stars in the universe.</p><p></p><p>If this is the case (which is boring I know), then event horizon is simply following the known Schwarzschild dynamics.</p><p></p><p>I admit though, this “inward expanding” next to the Hubble expansion which is “outward” looks really intriguing.</p><p></p><p>Unrelated comment...I might have my reservations about string theory but my god Lenny is such a good teacher when it comes to good old classical field theory. Everyone should read his “Theoretical Minimum” series. Especially people who are looking for a good entry point to the actual subject.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lovethebomb, post: 26822769, member: 531830"] You need AdS CFT to make this speculation work. That's where I get a little less enthusiastic. Also, this question: “why aren’t BHs expanding invasively?” always sounded off to me. Yes, the universe is quite old but BHs do not suck matter into them so ubiquitously. On top of that they can also decrease mass by way of radiation. So to say that BHs should be overbearingly large now is akin to saying that night sky should be brutally incandescent because there are immensely many stars in the universe. If this is the case (which is boring I know), then event horizon is simply following the known Schwarzschild dynamics. I admit though, this “inward expanding” next to the Hubble expansion which is “outward” looks really intriguing. Unrelated comment...I might have my reservations about string theory but my god Lenny is such a good teacher when it comes to good old classical field theory. Everyone should read his “Theoretical Minimum” series. Especially people who are looking for a good entry point to the actual subject. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom