Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Puffin Rock Characters Plush Toy Set
anil1961
Updated:
Nov 7, 2026
Toyota Vitz scp10 For Sale
Lakmal Bandara
Updated:
Nov 4, 2026
Kandy
Welcome all my all new pet shop Bark.lk
dilumrane
Updated:
Nov 2, 2026
Windows RDP Only Rs.500 a month
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Nov 1, 2026
Ad icon
V2ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Oct 22, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
News
Woman faces 40 lashes for wearing pants
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="x-pert" data-source="post: 5290610" data-attributes="member: 837"><p>Yes, she is trying to get the attention of the global community through media to show about Sudan's human rights violations. </p><p> </p><p>BBC/ CNN and almost all foreign media are somehwat biased to the party which gives them the bigger benefit. And they always try to find out about human rights and raise their voice. </p><p> </p><p>In Sri Lanka the situation was far more different. Without proper investigations they reported because both parties were publishing contradicting statements. And as I've said before, biased to the bigger benefit provider. </p><p> </p><p>But in this Sudanese case, it's different don't you think?</p><p> </p><p>Let's say even a woman did a wrong thing (of cause not like wearing some jeans), would you justify whipping (kasa pahara) a woman under any circumstances? </p><p> </p><p>That's what this is all about. Women should have their right to choose what they want to wear as long as it doesn't do any 'harm' to others in the community. And if any country or a religion restricts and whips women who don't obey the so called rules, then there is a problem somewhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="x-pert, post: 5290610, member: 837"] Yes, she is trying to get the attention of the global community through media to show about Sudan's human rights violations. BBC/ CNN and almost all foreign media are somehwat biased to the party which gives them the bigger benefit. And they always try to find out about human rights and raise their voice. In Sri Lanka the situation was far more different. Without proper investigations they reported because both parties were publishing contradicting statements. And as I've said before, biased to the bigger benefit provider. But in this Sudanese case, it's different don't you think? Let's say even a woman did a wrong thing (of cause not like wearing some jeans), would you justify whipping (kasa pahara) a woman under any circumstances? That's what this is all about. Women should have their right to choose what they want to wear as long as it doesn't do any 'harm' to others in the community. And if any country or a religion restricts and whips women who don't obey the so called rules, then there is a problem somewhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)
Post reply
Top
Bottom