Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Muthumina" data-source="post: 7092894" data-attributes="member: 80368">friendDon't reply for the sake of replyingI did not attempt to call your religion dumb in a subtle way <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" />Trust me I did not <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" />Every religion contains some advise targeted to keep the masses in order.Those advise are in most cases directed at the society and at that time and reflect the set of values of those ages.You have to understand that as people develop better values some of those earlier absolutes become outdated.I don't agree with some of those elements of my religion. But the stuff not designed to keep the masses in order appears to be timeless to me. And I wont shift because of that.If Questioning my religion makes me a half baked cake so be itI'm not going to believe everything somebody told thousands of years ago to a different audience without questioning it first.do you even believe something somebody says even now to you without thinking about it.Anyway you successfully pointed me in a wrong directionMy problem was, is that you are using your religion to justify sticking to some ancient value system where people did not treat women equallyWhilst not exactly following other things in your religion that does n't look profitable (hinders financial success ,survival etc) see that's double standards and that's ugly and That's what I want changed Do something about this.rather than talk about the nice things in the book.</blockquote>

Verification: Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)

Top Bottom