Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Thursday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Tuesday at 2:11 PM
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Sunday at 3:05 AM
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Worst movies
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="twisted" data-source="post: 7971828" data-attributes="member: 82108"><p>when that guy was convincing the rest why the offender was not guilty he uses very clear evidence ..to give you some, like how the passing trained would have blocked the view for one of the witnesses and how one of the witnesses couldn't have responded to some sound cos of his disability ...i dont remember many of these any more since i saw this sometime ago but while watching the movie it really bothered me why the lawyer of the guy didn't think of any of these? the stuff the jury guy just said was alone powerful enough to convince another 11 guys so with proper prioof the the lawyer could have won the case undoubtedly</p><p></p><p>any movie has plot holes ..i can't think of a single one that don't</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="twisted, post: 7971828, member: 82108"] when that guy was convincing the rest why the offender was not guilty he uses very clear evidence ..to give you some, like how the passing trained would have blocked the view for one of the witnesses and how one of the witnesses couldn't have responded to some sound cos of his disability ...i dont remember many of these any more since i saw this sometime ago but while watching the movie it really bothered me why the lawyer of the guy didn't think of any of these? the stuff the jury guy just said was alone powerful enough to convince another 11 guys so with proper prioof the the lawyer could have won the case undoubtedly any movie has plot holes ..i can't think of a single one that don't [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom