Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Y2K yaluwa meka balanna
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Y2K" data-source="post: 11720923" data-attributes="member: 35049"><p><strong>The Daughters of Allah </strong></p><p></p><p>"One of the most embarrassing events in Muhammad’s life occurred when Satan put his words in Muhammad’s mouth. Muhammad spoke Satan’s words as the word of God. This event is documented by several early Muslim scholars and referenced in the Hadith and Qur'an. Later Muslims, ashamed that their self declared prophet spoke Satan’s words, denied the event occurred. A myriad of excuses and denials have been put forth by these later Muhammadans to cover up Muhammad’s sinful error.</p><p></p><p>It must be pointed out again that the ‘Satanic Verses’ event is not something made up by non-Muslims. The event is recorded by the earliest Islamic sources available on Muhammad’s life. No one should think that it is a story made up by people who are critical of Islam. It is an episode directly found in the early Islamic records. </p><p></p><p>This topic is one of the most controversial in Islam. Satan caused Muhammad to recite his words as God’s words."</p><p></p><p><strong>What Did the Qur’an Originally Say?</strong></p><p></p><p>The Star Sura (Sura 53) verses 19-20 say, "Have ye seen Lat, and ‘Uzza, And another, the third (goddess), Manat?"</p><p></p><p>Allah was prominent in Pre-Islamic Arabia, as a god with three daughters: al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat. (Note that al- means "the".) <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/shocked.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":shocked:" title="Shocked :shocked:" data-shortname=":shocked:" /></p><p></p><p>The four early biographers of Mohammed wrote that they verses originally were followed by:</p><p></p><p>"These are the exalted cranes (intermediaries) Whose intercession is to be hoped for."</p><p></p><p>Interpretation: Allah’s daughters were considered heavenly beings of intercessors. High altitude Numidian cranes were a metaphor for them. An alternate reading for "is to be hoped for" (turtaja) is "is accepted with approval" (turtada). (From Alfred Guillaume’s translation of Ibn Ishaq’s The Life of Mohammed p.166. </p><p></p><p>Later, this passage was taken out and the following was put in its place:</p><p></p><p>"What! For you the male sex, And for him, the female? Behold, such would be Indeed a division Most unfair." (verses 53:21-22 today)</p><p></p><p>Interpretation: Those who believed in Allah’s three daughters were unfair toward Allah, since they all preferred sons yet said that Allah had only daughters.</p><p></p><p>These are what have been termed "The Satanic Verses". In modern times Salmon Rushdie used only this term as the title in his unrelated and fictional "novel", and this paper does not discuss that modern tale. As for the original Satanic verses, how can an objective Muslim or non-Muslim tell which verses were originally in? The rest of this paper gives direct and indirect evidence that the Satanic verses were originally there, and nine Muslim objections.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">බුදුහාමුදුරුවන්ට බුදුවෙන්නට ඉඩ නොදුන් මාරයන්ගෙ දුවරු ගැන සදහන් වෙනවා එ සදහන් වන්නෙ අල්ලාගේ දුවරුන්වත් ද? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">අදහසක් පමණයි!</span> <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P :P" data-shortname=":P" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Y2K, post: 11720923, member: 35049"] [B]The Daughters of Allah [/B] "One of the most embarrassing events in Muhammad’s life occurred when Satan put his words in Muhammad’s mouth. Muhammad spoke Satan’s words as the word of God. This event is documented by several early Muslim scholars and referenced in the Hadith and Qur'an. Later Muslims, ashamed that their self declared prophet spoke Satan’s words, denied the event occurred. A myriad of excuses and denials have been put forth by these later Muhammadans to cover up Muhammad’s sinful error. It must be pointed out again that the ‘Satanic Verses’ event is not something made up by non-Muslims. The event is recorded by the earliest Islamic sources available on Muhammad’s life. No one should think that it is a story made up by people who are critical of Islam. It is an episode directly found in the early Islamic records. This topic is one of the most controversial in Islam. Satan caused Muhammad to recite his words as God’s words." [B]What Did the Qur’an Originally Say?[/B] The Star Sura (Sura 53) verses 19-20 say, "Have ye seen Lat, and ‘Uzza, And another, the third (goddess), Manat?" Allah was prominent in Pre-Islamic Arabia, as a god with three daughters: al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat. (Note that al- means "the".) :shocked: The four early biographers of Mohammed wrote that they verses originally were followed by: "These are the exalted cranes (intermediaries) Whose intercession is to be hoped for." Interpretation: Allah’s daughters were considered heavenly beings of intercessors. High altitude Numidian cranes were a metaphor for them. An alternate reading for "is to be hoped for" (turtaja) is "is accepted with approval" (turtada). (From Alfred Guillaume’s translation of Ibn Ishaq’s The Life of Mohammed p.166. Later, this passage was taken out and the following was put in its place: "What! For you the male sex, And for him, the female? Behold, such would be Indeed a division Most unfair." (verses 53:21-22 today) Interpretation: Those who believed in Allah’s three daughters were unfair toward Allah, since they all preferred sons yet said that Allah had only daughters. These are what have been termed "The Satanic Verses". In modern times Salmon Rushdie used only this term as the title in his unrelated and fictional "novel", and this paper does not discuss that modern tale. As for the original Satanic verses, how can an objective Muslim or non-Muslim tell which verses were originally in? The rest of this paper gives direct and indirect evidence that the Satanic verses were originally there, and nine Muslim objections. [SIZE="4"]බුදුහාමුදුරුවන්ට බුදුවෙන්නට ඉඩ නොදුන් මාරයන්ගෙ දුවරු ගැන සදහන් වෙනවා එ සදහන් වන්නෙ අල්ලාගේ දුවරුන්වත් ද? අදහසක් පමණයි![/SIZE] :P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)
Post reply
Top
Bottom