Did Lord Buddha prohibited eating meat??

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

ළඟදීම කබරගොයා තලගොයා වෙයි වගේ..lol

Seems like mr ex has left bashing others and started looking into what he believes (or what he thinks he believes..)
Next step would be to stop engaging in fruitless worldly arguments and get your ipod and back to jungle..?

LOL. what can I do Bro? I left Islam and you cant accept that.
On top of that I am discussing Buddhism, a religion which completely deny the concept of a creator god.

I have discussed Islam in past in this forum many times, but it was impossible to have a discussion like this since there was nothing to discuss really, apart from camel piss and poles coming from rear end and comical stuff like that.

ධුඛ ථමයි භොස්!

 

[surfall]

LOL. what can I do Bro? I left Islam and you cant accept that.
On top of that I am discussing Buddhism, a religion which completely deny the concept of a creator god.

I have discussed Islam in past in this forum many times, but it was impossible to have a discussion like this since there was nothing to discuss really, apart from camel piss and poles coming from rear end and comical stuff like that.

ධුඛ ථමයි භොස්!

You cant accept the fact nobody cares what you believed before and what you follow now..that seems to be your main problem.

Funny you spent all this time opening threads on something which has nothing to discuss but no threads on the deepest philosophy that has all the stuff in the world to discuss.although seems like you guys cant go pass the simple meat issue..This discussion alone will be enough to fill the whole forum..with the last conclusion being - "why we argue about these kind of things which are not important to what we want to achieve "...like always

දුකම තමා ඉතින්...මස් ටිකවත් කන්න බැරි කොට

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

දුකම තමා ඉතින්...මස් ටිකවත් කන්න බැරි කොට

ඌරු මස් ද? ඒ වුනාට ඔටු හුජ්ජ බොන්න පුලුවන්නේ, ධුඛ් වෙන්න එපා භොස්!

 

[surfall]

ඌරු මස් ද? ඒ වුනාට ඔටු හුජ්ජ බොන්න පුලුවන්නේ, ධුඛ් වෙන්න එපා භොස්!

Excellent..back to your normal self...we thought we lost you
Enough with all these meaningless meat discussions..bashing is where the real fun is..like your jungle monk would say "අහමඩ්...අහමඩ්...,දත කාගෙන කරන්න දේවල් තියෙද්දි නිසරු ප්‍රස්න අහල කාලේ නාස්ති කරන්න එපා"

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

Excellent..back to your normal self...we thought we lost you
Enough with all these meaningless meat discussions..bashing is where the real fun is..like your jungle monk would say "අහමඩ්...අහමඩ්...,දත කාගෙන කරන්න දේවල් තියෙද්දි නිසරු ප්‍රස්න අහල කාලේ නාස්ති කරන්න එපා"

Yeah true but I am atheist bro!

So I always think about Mo humping Ayesha! it is Disgusting !

 

[surfall]

Yeah true but I am atheist bro!

So I always think about Mo humping Ayesha! it is Disgusting !

Ex mulsim, current atheist, who calls Buddha the lord and teaches Buddhism to Buddhists but goes around making threads more about what Buddha said meaningless stuff..pretty much paints the picture..jack of all..

Can we safely assume this (dead) meat thread is just another on the pile without any conclusion?.. since the author himself has diverted this to his favorite subject now

 

[ela_eluwa120]

If you insist, in my humble opinion "specifically Killed" is killing with the intention of providing food for a specific person or group of people.

I wonder if that's the case when fishermen kill fish or cows killed in slaughter house. I think those who do the animal slaughter for livelihood are doing it with the intention of providing for their family, without any hatred or grudge against the animal that is killed.

In most cases I honestly dont think that they "specifically" know and are killing for a specific group of people. Atmost the worst case is that they are killing for the "WORLD AT LARGE" which loses the whole idea of "Specificity"

Okey. So, where do you draw the line between world at large and specificality? Suppose that a cow is slaughtered for a classroom with 35 students. Now, is the cow specifically slaughtered for the students of the classroom? Or does it comes under the category of world at large? What if the size of the classroom is 200 students? Where does the specificality vanishes and world at large appears? What is the threshold? If the threshold is X, then why X? Why not Y or Z?

Sorry mate, I was actually away for a month or so and did not really have time to come here. I remember I left a discussion with you unfinished, but can't really find which thread that was. lol. Thanks for the concern man.

I remember the thread. It is the "sinhalayanani" thread by Iveystyle. Actually, it was my turn to reply. But, I kept postponing it and evetually forgot it. My bad.

 

[ela_eluwa120]

ත්‍රිකෝටි පාරිශුද්ධ මාංශයක් ගැන මජ්ඣිම නිකායේ ජීවක සූත්‍රයෙහි සඳහන් වෙන බවක් කියනවා.

තමන් වෙනුවෙන් මැරූ බව නොදුටු (අදිට්ඨං)
තමන් වෙනුවෙන් මැරූ බව නොඇසූ (අසූතං)
තමන් වෙනුවෙන් මැරූ බව සැකයක් නොමැති (අපරිසංඛිතං) සත්ත්ව මාංශයයි.


As I see, Meat that we buy from a shop is killed for us and therefore is not suitable to eat. Buy eating that meat and creating a demand for meat we become a part of the action of killing that animal. Just my opinion.

I agree that it is a very complicated issue though.

According to these three principles, one should believe that some meat is not specifically killed for them.

 

[ela_eluwa120]

ළඟදීම කබරගොයා තලගොයා වෙයි වගේ..lol

Seems like mr ex has left bashing others and started looking into what he believes (or what he thinks he believes..)
Next step would be to stop engaging in fruitless worldly arguments and get your ipod and back to jungle..?

I agree that bashing religions is not acceptable. I avoid it whenever possible. But, this forum should be open to critical examination of religions. I see some people confuse critical examination for bashing.

Yeah true but I am atheist bro!

How do you define your atheism. First time in my life I saw antheist who believe in reincarnation and some sort of mysticism.

 

[surfall]

I agree that bashing religions is not acceptable. I avoid it whenever possible. But, this forum should be open to critical examination of religions. I see some people confuse critical examination for bashing.

I dont disagree..problem comes when you "critical examine" something based on what you merely heard or seen. And when it comes to religion if you do this, you really cant find the line between critical examination and bashing..

How do you define your atheism. First time in my life I saw antheist who believe in reincarnation and some sort of mysticism.

I would love to hear something other than "I dont believe but i have respect" He learns from a monk in jungle, actively promotes and searches sutras for friends to listen from their ipods...but he doesnt believe in it

 

[AncientGlory]

I remember the thread. It is the "sinhalayanani" thread by Iveystyle. Actually, it was my turn to reply. But, I kept postponing it and evetually forgot it. My bad.

No problem.

 

[AncientGlory]

According to these three principles, one should believe that some meat is not specifically killed for them.

I think one should know for sure, not just believe. But the complicated issue arises when one will not understand that he will become a part of the killing process when he buys meat from a shop. In that case it is justifiable that according to his view point, he might know/understand that animal is not killed for him.

 

[ela_eluwa120]

No problem.

I will start it again.

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

I dont disagree..problem comes when you "critical examine" something based on what you merely heard or seen. And when it comes to religion if you do this, you really cant find the line between critical examination and bashing..


I would love to hear something other than "I dont believe but i have respect" He learns from a monk in jungle, actively promotes and searches sutras for friends to listen from their ipods...but he doesnt believe in it

It is a step by step process. first you make them leave Islam, then they become Buddhists, then they become atheists.

Just as like you save someone from burning in flames, bring him to safety nurse his wounds and then when he is well you show him the great swimming pool filled with hot girls!

 

[surfall]

It is a step by step process. first you make them leave Islam, then they become Buddhists, then they become atheists.

Just as like you save someone from burning in flames, bring him to safety nurse his wounds and then when he is well you show him the great swimming pool filled with hot girls!

Uh i get it..so this thread is the second step to make Buddhists start eating meat by using their own scriptures to confuse them..but i dont think they are that stupid dude..

 

[ex-muslim Ahmed]

Uh i get it..so this thread is the second step to make Buddhists start eating meat by using their own scriptures to confuse them..but i dont think they are that stupid dude..

No you don't get it! but you think you do.

The thing is that many young guys stop at leaving Islam and becoming Buddhists. They cannot makeup their mind to become Atheists. many ex-muslims are still afraid of Total freedom and Women.

So most ex-muslims get contented at the second step and they never get to see the swimming pool filled with hot chicks! Oh man you can almost feel the P*ssy smell in the air! but what a pity!

Buddhist have followed middle path all over the world for 2600 years and they have eaten meat from the very beginning of Buddhism. Sudden interest in Muslims to give their interpretation on Buddhism and eating meat is obvious! However as usual they have failed miserably! Buddhist are wise enough to reject extremism of any kind. sorry try again!

 

[Hettiarachi]

No you don't get it! but you think you do.

The thing is that many young guys stop at leaving Islam and becoming Buddhists. They cannot makeup their mind to become Atheists. many ex-muslims are still afraid of Total freedom and Women.

So most ex-muslims get contented at the second step and they never get to see the swimming pool filled with hot chicks! Oh man you can almost feel the P*ssy smell in the air! but what a pity!

Buddhist have followed middle path all over the world for 2600 years and they have eaten meat from the very beginning of Buddhism. Sudden interest in Muslims to give their interpretation on Buddhism and eating meat is obvious! However as usual they have failed miserably! Buddhist are wise enough to reject extremism of any kind. sorry try again!

Here it is, affect of Buddhism... I feel ex muslim ahmed would have used decent words, if he still be a muslim.

Surfal, you are advised to be away from this nonsense people. this so called Athiest, have no any ambition of living in this world, and are not required to fear any higher authority/God and the after death life. they lead their life as their wish so can do and can say watever they want.

 

[surfall]

Agree with you Mr.Hettiarachi, but where i live there are quiet a lot of people who dont believe in god/Atheist but still they are "good" people and know how to talk and act decently.

So we cant put everyone in one boat just cuz they say believe or dont believe in something, you only can measure a person by how he acts/behaves..

The important thing is there are people who use words like atheist, buddists etc to fulfill their own dirty agendas..seems like this is a good example, confusion is ex-muslims main tool..

Since this thread is about budhist eating meat, And by a guy claims to be an atheist (Who has learned from a monk ) and want to divert buddists from their belief..i would like to see how Buddhists react to this..

 

[ela_eluwa120]

Here it is, affect of Buddhism... I feel ex muslim ahmed would have used decent words, if he still be a muslim.

Surfal, you are advised to be away from this nonsense people. this so called Athiest, have no any ambition of living in this world, and are not required to fear any higher authority/God and the after death life. they lead their life as their wish so can do and can say watever they want.

Forget about ex-Ahmed.
What you really meant by atheists "lead their life as their wish so can do and say whatever they want"?

Are you stereotyping atheists?

 

[ela_eluwa120]

I dont disagree..problem comes when you "critical examine" something based on what you merely heard or seen. And when it comes to religion if you do this, you really cant find the line between critical examination and bashing..

I don't understand why you stressed merely heard or seen. You can't refrain from taking data from a given source simply because I don't like that source. Disputes concerning sources can be resolved via analysis. After all, critical examination means critical examination of the sources as well.