මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන් හා ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා

sirajstc

Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    58,814
    1,618
    113
    ~*~CeYLoN..~*~
    මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන් හා ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා

    alokayakara
    581214_408696419159480_100000573764188_1444318_1624788141_n-1.jpg




    The Hindu පුවත්පත මාර්තු 29 වන දින පිළිකා සම්බන්ධ ලිපි පල කරන ලදී .
    ස්ත්‍රීන්ගෙන් 17% (Cervical Cancer) නම් ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා වාර්ශිකව මියයයි.



    නමුත් මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ගේ ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව සඳහන් කරයි. මෙයට ප්‍රධානතම හේතුව මුස්ලිම් පිරිමි පාර්ශ්වය චර්මචේදනය (Circumcision) කර ගැනීමයි. එම ලිපිය පවසන ආකාරයට මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ට ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා මුස්ලිම් නොවන කාන්තාවන් හා සැසඳීමේදී ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව එම ලිපිය සඳහන් කරයි.


    Cervical cancer is around 40 per cent less common in Muslim women than in Hindu women. This is the uncommon evidence that has emerged from the ‘Million Death Study’, a collaborative research between Centre for Global Health Research (CGHR) and the Office of the Registrar General of India. The findings of the research, titled ‘Cancer mortality in India: A Nationally Representative Survey,’ were published in the British medical journal, The Lancet, recently.


    Dr Arun Shet, head of the department of oncology at city-based St John’s Medical College Hospital and co-researcher in the cancer mortality survey, told Bangalore Mirror, “In 2010, more than 5.56 lakh cancer deaths were estimated in India and 71.1 per cent occurred in people aged between 30 and 69 years. With regard to women, cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death both in urban and rural areas. But what is interesting is that cervical cancer risks were much lower in Muslim women and in states where the proportion of Muslims was larger.”

    Cervical cancer starts in the cervix, the lower part of the uterus (womb) that opens at the top of the vagina. Among the top three fatal cancers among women, cervical cancer (with an incidence of 17 per cent) is followed by stomach cancer (14 per cent) and breast cancer (10 per cent).

    On Muslim women being less prone to cervical cancer compared to Hindu women, Dr Shet attributed the phenomenon to circumcision among Muslim men. Circumcision has a protective effect against sexual transmission of human papilloma virus (HPV), which is a causative agent in cervical cancer, Dr Arun said.

    The study throws light on vulnerability levels based on demography: The age-standardised rates (30-69 years) for cervical cancer in women in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam (where 75 per cent and 40 per cent of the total populations respectively are Muslims) were less than a quarter of the nationwide rates for cervical cancer.

    Reacting to the survey, Dr M Vijay Kumar, professor and director, department of surgery, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, said, “The Muslim factor for cervical cancer is so distinct that the rate for this type of cancer is low in states with a significant Muslim population. It is not that Muslim women do not get cervical cancer; the fact is they are less vulnerable because of circumcision among males. The chances of Muslim women getting cervical cancer will get delayed, maybe 20 years or more after consummation.”

    Interestingly, the study suggested that Muslim women were more prone to breast and stomach cancers.

    On the strategies to reduce cervical cancer deaths, the research suggested vaccination against human papilloma virus before marriage and, for married women, a one-time testing or screening followed by visual inspection with acetic acid and further referral for treatment.
    sources
    http://www.bangaloremirror.com/inde...1&contentid=20120503201205030505361091fe5d0fe
    http://www.indialeaks.com/index.php...e-to-cervical-cancer-than-hindu-counterparts/
     
    Last edited:

    ex-muslim Ahmed

    Well-known member
  • Mar 7, 2009
    3,355
    767
    113
    alokayakara



    The Hindu පුවත්පත මාර්තු 29 වන දින පිළිකා සම්බන්ධ ලිපි පල කරන ලදී .
    ස්ත්‍රීන්ගෙන් 17% (Cervical Cancer) නම් ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා වාර්ශිකව මියයයි.



    නමුත් මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ගේ ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව සඳහන් කරයි. මෙයට ප්‍රධානතම හේතුව මුස්ලිම් පිරිමි පාර්ශ්වය චර්මචේදනය (Circumcision) කර ගැනීමයි. එම ලිපිය පවසන ආකාරයට මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ට ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා මුස්ලිම් නොවන කාන්තාවන් හා සැසඳීමේදී ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව එම ලිපිය සඳහන් කරයි.

    හින්දු පුවත්පත සයන්ස් ජ්'නල් එකක්.. :yes:
    මේන්න මුගේ ටිකිරි මොලේ!
    :lol::lol:
     

    Captain Arjun!!!!!

    Well-known member
  • Apr 20, 2011
    4,912
    208
    63
    alokayakara
    581214_408696419159480_100000573764188_1444318_1624788141_n-1.jpg




    The Hindu පුවත්පත මාර්තු 29 වන දින පිළිකා සම්බන්ධ ලිපි පල කරන ලදී .
    ස්ත්‍රීන්ගෙන් 17% (Cervical Cancer) නම් ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා වාර්ශිකව මියයයි.



    නමුත් මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ගේ ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව සඳහන් කරයි. මෙයට ප්‍රධානතම හේතුව මුස්ලිම් පිරිමි පාර්ශ්වය චර්මචේදනය (Circumcision) කර ගැනීමයි. එම ලිපිය පවසන ආකාරයට මුස්ලිම් කාන්තාවන්ට ගැබ්ගෙල පිළිකා මුස්ලිම් නොවන කාන්තාවන් හා සැසඳීමේදී ඉතාමත් අඩු මට්ටමක පවතින බව එම ලිපිය සඳහන් කරයි.
    The Hindu-link eka ko?
     

    amila_mp

    Well-known member
  • Oct 25, 2007
    6,061
    1,686
    113
    ~ Note3One ~
    uba oya kiyanne hema muslim kellektama muslim kollek ariyoth ne..eeka ehema wenne nehane ban hema welema, sinhala ewunuth dakshayo
     

    sirajstc

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    58,814
    1,618
    113
    ~*~CeYLoN..~*~
    මචං c2 සුන්නත් කිරීමෙන් ගොඩාක් ලෙඩ නැතිවෙනවා ඕකෙන් ප්‍රාදාන වාසිය ඒඩ්ස් කියන බයානක ලෙඩේ හැදෙන්නේ නෑ...

    අනිත් එක වයිෆ් ටත් හොදයි....එයාටත් ලෙඩ නෑ..:)
     

    Fox C2

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2011
    15,275
    2,674
    113
    nomans land
    මචං c2 සුන්නත් කිරීමෙන් ගොඩාක් ලෙඩ නැතිවෙනවා ඕකෙන් ප්‍රාදාන වාසිය ඒඩ්ස් කියන බයානක ලෙඩේ හැදෙන්නේ නෑ...

    අනිත් එක වයිෆ් ටත් හොදයි....එයාටත් ලෙඩ නෑ..:)
    aids hadenne nathiwenna mama danna hatiyata contact nowi inna ona, sunnath kalata wadak na ban,
    mama igena gaththu hatiyata foreskin eke wasi goday,
     

    Fox C2

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2011
    15,275
    2,674
    113
    nomans land
    http://www.noharmm.org/advantage.htm
    meka balapan;
    8. Immunological defense. The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies, and antibacterial and antiviral proteins [7, 14], such as the pathogen-killing enzyme called lysozyme [15 and
    Blue_ArrowD096.gif
    see explanation]. All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth, eyelids, vagina, foreskin and anus) are the body's first line of defense against disease. This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanation why intact men are at lower risk of chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases
     
    Last edited:

    sirajstc

    Well-known member
  • Apr 2, 2008
    58,814
    1,618
    113
    ~*~CeYLoN..~*~
    Circumcision Benefits
    New research says adult male circumcision significantly reduces risk of acquiring HIV.
    The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced an early end to two clinical trials of adult male circumcision because an interim review of trial data revealed that medically performed circumcision significantly reduces a man's risk of acquiring HIV through heterosexual intercourse. The trial in Kisumu, Kenya, of 2,784 HIV-negative men showed a 53 percent reduction of HIV acquisition in circumcised men relative to uncircumcised men, while a trial of 4,996 HIV-negative men in Rakai, Uganda, showed that HIV acquisition was reduced by 48 percent in circumcised men.
    "These findings are of great interest to public health policy makers who are developing and implementing comprehensive HIV prevention programs, “ says NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. "Male circumcision performed safely in a medical environment complements other HIV prevention strategies and could lessen the burden of HIV/AIDS, especially in countries in sub-Saharan Africa where, according to the 2006 estimates from UNAIDS, 2.8 million new infections occurred in a single year."
    "Many studies have suggested that male circumcision plays a role in protecting against HIV acquisition," notes NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. "We now have confirmation — from large, carefully controlled, randomized clinical trials — showing definitively that medically performed circumcision can significantly lower the risk of adult males contracting HIV through heterosexual intercourse. While the initial benefit will be fewer HIV infections in men, ultimately adult male circumcision could lead to fewer infections in women in those areas of the world where HIV is spread primarily through heterosexual intercourse."
    The findings from the African studies may have less impact on the epidemic in the United States for several reasons. In the United States, most men have been circumcised. Also, there is a lower prevalence of HIV. Moreover, most infections among men in the United States are in men who have sex with men, for whom the amount of benefit provided by circumcision is unknown. Nonetheless, the overall findings of the African studies are likely to be broadly relevant regardless of geographic location: a man at sexual risk who is uncircumcised is more likely than a man who is circumcised to become infected with HIV. Still, circumcision is only part of a broader HIV prevention strategy that includes limiting the number of sexual partners and using condoms during intercourse.
    The co-principal investigators of the Kenyan trial are Robert Bailey, Ph.D., M.P.H., of the University of Illinois at Chicago, and Stephen Moses, M.D., M.P.H., University of Manitoba, Canada. In addition to NIAID support, the Kenyan trial was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and included Kenyan researchers Jeckoniah Ndinya-Achola, M.B.Ch.B., and Kawango Agot, Ph.D., M.P.H. The Ugandan trial is led by Ronald Gray, M.B.B.S., M.Sc., of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Additional collaborators in the Ugandan trial were David Serwadda, M.Med., M.Sc., M.P.H., Nelson Sewankambo, M.B.Ch.B., M.Med.M.Sc., Stephen Watya, M.B.Ch.B., M.Med., and Godfrey Kigozi, M.B.Ch.B., M.P.H.
    Both trials involved adult, HIV-negative heterosexual male volunteers assigned at random to either intervention (circumcision performed by trained medical professionals in a clinic setting) or no intervention (no circumcision). All participants were extensively counseled in HIV prevention and risk reduction techniques.
    Both trials reached their enrollment targets by September 2005 and were originally designed to continue follow-up until mid-2007. However, at the regularly scheduled meeting of the NIAID Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) on December 12, 2006, reviewers assessed the interim data and deemed medically performed circumcision safe and effective in reducing HIV acquisition in both trials. They therefore recommended the two studies be halted early. All men who were randomized into the non-intervention arms will now be offered circumcision.
    "It is critical to emphasize that these clinical trials demonstrated that medical circumcision is safe and effective when the procedure is performed by medically trained professionals and when patients receive appropriate care during the healing period following surgery," notes Dr. Fauci.
    Researchers have noted significant variations in HIV prevalence that seemed, at least in certain African and Asian countries, to be associated with levels of male circumcision in the community. In areas where circumcision is common, HIV prevalence tends to be lower; conversely, areas of higher HIV prevalence overlapped with regions where male circumcision is not commonly practiced.
    Results of the first randomized clinical trial assessing the protective value of male circumcision against HIV infection, conducted by a team of French and South African researchers in South Africa, were reported in 2005. That trial of more than 3,000 HIV-negative men showed that circumcision reduced the risk of acquiring HIV by 60 percent. The trial was funded by the French Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida (ANRS) (see http://www.anrs.fr/).
    For more information on the Kenyan and Ugandan trials of adult male circumcision, see the NIAID Questions and Answers document at http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/news/QA/AMC12_QA.htm.
    The World Health Organization (WHO) press statement in response to the NIAID DSMB recommendation is available on the WHO web site, www.who.int/hiv.
    More Medical benefits

    • Cleanliness - although it is true, a circumcised penis does not collect any white stuff underneath the foreskin like an intact penis does
    • Decreased risk of STD's
    • Decreased risk of penile cancer
    • Avoiding infections in the foreskin
    • Avoiding the need to do it later on
    • Avoiding bladder infections
    • Avoiding bad sexual intercourse