Aethist corner of Elakiri

[sachith19920726]

Wrong english is this how you make software?

anyone has right to believe what they want to. besides who you are to convince others?

so i have the rights too for express my ideas freely cause this is a democratic country..

wrong english maybe cause my mother tongue is sinhala and i am not good at it.. but if you get the idea about what the fuq i just said then whats the big deal..

but the real question is who the fuck are you you nub shit head
​

​

 

[Sri_Lankan_Atheists]

http://nidahass.blogspot.ca/2014/02/blog-post_7649.html

 

[DJvodka]

They are not proven either....why should we believe in something that is not proven....There are no evidence for the existence of karma and rebirth...remember...what can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.

Again based on your own theory, no one has proven them wrong either,
which brings us back to the concept of belief.
The modern science is based on many assumptions too. Assumptions that
may or may not be correct.
So ultimately you have to believe something or someone right?

 

[DJvodka]

You are not supposed to believe it rather realize it yourself.

Very true A true Buddhist can never be an Atheist!

 

[rajitha_ks]

trying to explain everything using science ???
well good luck with that

if trying to explain everything using myth is your way of doing it, well good luck my friend. i'd rather go with science which enabled me to type this comment using a device called computer which works by manipulating electrons.

 

[buba149]

so i have the rights too for express my ideas freely cause this is a democratic country..

wrong english maybe cause my mother tongue is sinhala and i am not good at it.. but if you get the idea about what the fuq i just said then whats the big deal..

but the real question is who the fuck are you you nub shit head
​

​

you're really hard on it, weren't u? from where did u pick those words? anyway i admit ur english is less disgusting than ur sinhala coz i have seen ur filthy sinhala all over the elakiri and no one can stand with it.

by the way why dont you speak in sinhala then?

 

[Sri_Lankan_Atheists]

Again based on your own theory, no one has proven them wrong either,
which brings us back to the concept of belief.
The modern science is based on many assumptions too. Assumptions that
may or may not be correct.
So ultimately you have to believe something or someone right?

Just because no one has proven something wrong does not mean it is right...the claim maker should give reasons to prove him right at the first place.

 

[GuneBhai]

trying to explain everything using science ???
well good luck with that

Well Science can explain any thing given that Science has understanding of the subject.

If Science cannot explain something now doesn't mean that it won't explain it in the future.

 

[buba149]

Well Science can explain any thing given that Science has understanding of the subject.

If Science cannot explain something now doesn't mean that it won't explain it in the future.

yes exactly. I still cannot understand how a microprocessor does all those things. (can google and see but doesnt make sense) Like this i can imagine how our ancestors may have thought about Tv and Radio.
Science is the nature of things nothing alien or nothing sudda brought up to invade our precious country. (well some people think so)

 

[mmrizmy]

Im an atheist machan, good u started this thread, coz this is filled with racism.. and i know racist wont like this much

 

[DJvodka]

Just because no one has proven something wrong does not mean it is right...the claim maker should give reasons to prove him right at the first place.

I think you have misunderstood the point entirely. The original argument was about the belief,
not about random science stories. There is no direct relationship between science and Atheism what so ever.
I don't know why you have dragged science to this. Because Atheism is just disbelief of existence of deity.
To that, my counter argument was that if someone rejects or accepts something based on moral instinct,
then that of course is nothing but belief. So in that sense, Atheism is just like another religion based on some belief.

 

[sachith19920726]

you're really hard on it, weren't u? from where did u pick those words? anyway i admit ur english is less disgusting than ur sinhala coz i have seen ur filthy sinhala all over the elakiri and no one can stand with it.

by the way why dont you speak in sinhala then?

lol



english වලින් අහන එකට සිංහලෙන් උත්තර දෙන සිරිතක් තියේද ?
mother tongue කියන එකේ තේරුම වත් දන්නෙ නැත්ද මහ ලොකු සුද්දා



mother tongue කියන්නෙ මව් භාෂාව උලමො
ගොන් කම ප්‍රදර්ශනය කරන්නෙ නැතුව යනවද ඔයා


​

 

[navodwickra]

you're (You were) really hard on it, weren't u? from where did u pick those words? anyway i admit ur english is less disgusting than ur sinhala coz i have seen ur filthy sinhala all over the elakiri and no one can stand with it(no one can stand it).

by the way why dont you speak in sinhala then?

Hmmmm so much for your fucking English.

 

[lprj]

Dear ආගමක් නැති මිතුරනි, ඔබගේ දෙමව්පියන් බෞද්ධ වී ඔබ ආගම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කර ගැලිලියෝ ගැලලි ඇදහිමට ගත්තේ නම් මටත් කියන්න ඇත්තේ ඔබට ගැලිලියෝගේම පිහිටයි කියායි.

මා ජීවත් වන්නේ ලෝකයේ හැමදාම සමහර දර්ශක වලින් හොදමයයි සැලකෙන යුරෝපිය රටකය. මෙහි ඔබ ලා වැනි ආගමක් නැති මිනිසුන් බොහොම පිරිසක් දැක ගත හැකිය. මේ රටවල් වල ගැලවුම් කරුවා ගැලිලියෝය . Science නොතිබුනන්නම් මේ රටවල් හිගන්නන්ය . මුලින්ම මොවුන් තුවක්කුව සොයා ගනී . ඊට පසු ආසියානු,අප්‍රිකානු සහ ඇමරිකානු රටවල් අල්ලා ගෙන තමුන්ගේ රටවල් දියුණු කර ගනී. දැන් නවීන තාක්ෂනය උපරිමයටම උපයෝගි කරගෙන තමුන්ගේ නිෂපාදන දුප්පත් රටවල් වලට විකුණා තව තවත් දියුණුවේ . ඇත්තටම බැලුවොත් මොඋන්ගේ දෙවියන් ගැලිලියෝ ම ය . මම වාසය කරන රටෙහි වයස අවුරුදු 14 වෙද්දී පතිවත(virgin ) ඇති ගැහැණු ළමයකු සොයා ගැනීම අපහසුය. පාරේ කන් කරාබු , පච්ච කොටගෙන සිකරට් උරමින් ඉන්න පොඩි කෙල්ලෝ කොල්ලෝ මෙහි සුලබ දසුන්ය. අවුරුදු 50 පැන්න නාකි මිනිස්සුන්ට girlfriend ලා 5-6ක් සිටි. වැඩිහිටියන්ට ගරු කිරීම බින්දුවයි . අපි ලංකාවේ අම්මල තාත්තලා එක්ක එකට ඉන්නවා කිව්වම එක එයාලට හිත ගන්නවත් බැහැලු . තව ඕනෑතරම් දේවල් ලියන්න පුළුවන් . මට කියන්න ඕන උනේ මේකයි , මෙහෙ මිනිස්සු කොච්චර පිරිහිලා ද කියල. මම දන්නා විදිහට ගැලීලියෝගේ ආගමේ පිරිහීම මනිනෙත් නැ එක එයාට ඕනෙත් නැ.

එක නිසා එළකිරි එකේ ඉන්න ආගමක් නැති යාළුවනි ඔබට බුදු දහම ගැන සැකයක් ඇති උනානම් එක නිවාරණය කර ගන්න පොඩ්ඩක් උත්සාහ කරන්න. මොකද අපි හැමෝම මෝහයෙන් මුල වෙන්න පුළුවන් සමහර වෙලාවල් වලදී .

Science අපේ ජීවිතය පහසු කර ගන්නයි බඩ වියත රැක ගන්නයි යොදා ගෙන නිර්මල බුදු දහම අපගේ අධ්‍යාත්මික දියුණුවටත් සිතේ සැනසීම ලබා ගැනීමත් පිණිස යොදා ගන්නේ නම් ඔය සුද්දගේ aethiest කියන වචනේ අපිට ඕන වෙන්නේ නැ .

 

[y2j2]

who bumped this thread

 

[y2j2]

Well Science can explain any thing given that Science has understanding of the subject.

If Science cannot explain something now doesn't mean that it won't explain it in the future.

 

[tharakato]

Good for you atheist friends. Stay in this corner. don't learn science. (specially quantum science )otherwise you will loose your faith

 

[Tom Riddle]

I think you have misunderstood the point entirely. The original argument was about the belief,
not about random science stories. There is no direct relationship between science and Atheism what so ever.
I don't know why you have dragged science to this. Because Atheism is just disbelief of existence of deity.
To that, my counter argument was that if someone rejects or accepts something based on moral instinct,
then that of course is nothing but belief. So in that sense, Atheism is just like another religion based on some belief.

Rejecting something because of moral instinct may be a belief. Atheism, however, has nothing to do with instinct.

Atheism is rejecting God because of a lack of evidence.

Rejecting something because of a lack of evidence is NOT a belief. ​

We reject unicorns and tooth fairies because there is no evidence for them. Is rejecting unicorns a 'belief'?

Read up on the 'Philosophic Burden of Proof'. Sri_Lankan_Atheists has not misunderstood anything. It is you who has misunderstood science.

 

[DJvodka]

Rejecting something because of moral instinct may be a belief. Atheism, however, has nothing to do with instinct.

Atheism is rejecting God because of a lack of evidence.

Rejecting something because of a lack of evidence is NOT a belief. ​

We reject unicorns and tooth fairies because there is no evidence for them. Is rejecting unicorns a 'belief'?

Read up on the 'Philosophic Burden of Proof'. Sri_Lankan_Atheists has not misunderstood anything. It is you who has misunderstood science.

It's really funny you've mentioned philosophical burden of proof and forget the very basics of it.

See it's you "Atheists" that brought the premise to the table, of non existence of deity
and therefor the claiming party, you, should provide facts to backup your proposition,
not me.

 

[Tom Riddle]

It's really funny you've mentioned philosophical burden of proof and forget the very basics of it.

See it's you "Atheists" that brought the premise to the table, of non existence of deity
and therefor the claiming party, you, should provide facts to backup your proposition,
not me.

If you claim that there is a god, you need to prove it.

If someone claims that there is NO god with 100% certainty, yes I agree that THEY need to prove it.


But this is NOT what most learned atheists do. We are not on a mission to DISPROVE God.

We are not 'claiming non-existence'. We are just asking for evidence for your claim before we accept it.

If you tell met that you saw a green alien last night, I will ask you for evidence. I am not going to just take your word for it. Does this mean that I am 'claiming nonexistence'?


If someone says that unicorns exist, and if I say that I don't believe what you say because there is no evidence, who do you think should give proof?


Also, my earlier question that you did not answer

We reject unicorns and tooth fairies because there is no evidence for them. Is rejecting unicorns a 'belief'? Do you think people who reject unicorns are part of a religion?



PS - you might go off on a tangent about a definition of a word now, just adding this as a precaution