Switzerland regrets SL’s commitment to due process being questioned

[pga]

Switzerland regrets SL’s commitment to due process being questioned

Switzerland yesterday said that it never intended to tarnish the image of the Sri Lankan Government and regretted that recent developments had led to the questioning of Sri Lanka’s commitment to due process.

“At no point during this time did Switzerland have the intention of tarnishing the image of the government of Sri Lanka. The Embassy regrets that these developments have led to the Sri Lankan authorities commitment to due process being called into question and reaffirms that Switzerland, like Sri Lanka, is committed to upholding good governance and the rule of law,” the Embassy said in a Diplomatic Note to the Ministry of Foreign Relations of Sri Lanka.

The Note communicated on December 30 was simultaneously released by the Embassy of Switzerland in Sri Lanka and the Ministry of Foreign Relations today.

The Diplomatic Note read, “The Embassy of Switzerland in Colombo presents its compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka and has the honour to state the following:

Switzerland and Sri Lanka have maintained excellent relations for decades, and have engaged in substantial cooperation in a variety of fields, to the benefit of both countries and their populations. Both countries value these relations greatly.

In the last few weeks, this relationship was marred by misunderstandings surrounding an incident involving a local staff member of the Embassy, who was subsequently taken into custody by the Sri Lankan authorities.

In this context, uncorroborated facts made it into the public domain, putting an unnecessary strain on the otherwise cordial relationship between the two countries.

At no point during this time did Switzerland have the intention of tarnishing the image of the government of Sri Lanka.

The Embassy regrets that these developments have led to the Sri Lankan authorities commitment to due process being called into question and reaffirms that Switzerland, like Sri Lanka, is committed to upholding good governance and the rule of law.

The Embassy hopes for a swift return to an environment conducive to resuming the positive cooperation between Switzerland and Sri Lanka.

Recognizing that local staff is subject to local laws, the Embassy is convinced that both sides will remain attentive to the working conditions and the well-being of all staff of diplomatic missions.

Switzerland recalls that it is the responsibility of any government to protect the diplomatic missions of other states on its territory.

Attaching great importance to its relationship with Sri Lanka, committed to maintaining and to further strengthening these relations in a constructive manner, and convinced that both countries will together continue to build relations which are based on mutual respect, the Embassy of Switzerland in Colombo avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka the assurances of its highest consideration.”

http://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking_...nt-to-due-process-being-questioned/108-180449

 

[Emoney_Help]

Loke inna lokuma horu salli hangana rata neda Swisterland kiyanne. Okunwa elawanna ona lanka wen. Swisterland,Norway maha jara ratawal.

 

[malakadss]

එයාලට රිදිලාද? බලමු කොහොමද ගානියාව පන්නන්නේ කියලා. ගානියාගේ බොරුව ඔප්පු වෙලා තියෙද්දිත් තවත් වටේ යනවනේ .. ගානියාව බෝට්ටුවෙන් අරන් ගියා නම් ඉවරයි නේ වටේ යන්නේ නෑතිව. ඔය වගේ රටේ නම කන එවුන් ලන්කාවට කොහොමත් ඕනේ නෑනේ.

 

[pga]

එයාලට රිදිලාද? බලමු කොහොමද ගානියාව පන්නන්නේ කියලා. ගානියාගේ බොරුව ඔප්පු වෙලා තියෙද්දිත් තවත් වටේ යනවනේ .. ගානියාව බෝට්ටුවෙන් අරන් ගියා නම් ඉවරයි නේ වටේ යන්නේ නෑතිව. ඔය වගේ රටේ නම කන එවුන් ලන්කාවට කොහොමත් ඕනේ නෑනේ.

dan shape karanna hadanawa

 

[pga]

Swiss Embassy staffer case: BASL condemns Swiss Govt.’s statement

Swiss Embassy staffer case: BASL condemns Swiss Govt.’s statement

Referring to the statement issued by the Government of Switzerland on judicial proceedings pending in court involving an employee of the Swiss Embassy, the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) said yesterday, it creates a wrong and misconceived impression about the role of the judiciary in Sri Lanka and the concept of “due process” as referred to in the statement.

It said the averment referred to an incident which is alleged to have taken place on November 25, 2019 and in respect of which a court case is currently pending in the Magistrates Court of Colombo.

The statement issued by the BASL notes,

"Hence, in our capacity as the largest professional body of the members in the Legal profession, we believe that it is our duty to set the record straight in this instance.

"In this regard, we would invite the attention of the Swiss Government and the Swiss Embassy in Sri Lanka and any other individual or institution which views the incident on the same footing as the makers of the above statement, to the following matters:

1. The alleged incident of abduction is claimed to have taken place on the 25th of November 2019, 9 days after the recently concluded presidential election in Sri Lanka.

2. However, according to the reports filed in Court, no complaint was made to the Police regarding the alleged abduction of the employee of the Swiss Embassy until the 27th of November 2019.

3. It is an elementary fact that under any criminal justice system, spontaneity and consistency of a complaint is considered to be extremely vital in the assessment of the credibility of such a statement.

4. When such a complaint is made, it is imperative that the legal enforcement mechanism requires the launch of an immediate investigation. The proceedings in the Magistrates Court reflect that this requirement has been satisfied by the investigators.

5. The record bears out that, for several days, the Swiss Embassy took up the position that the employee concerned was unwell and could not make out a testimony. The word “testimony” is generally referred to evidence given in a court of Law under oath and is not referred to an instance where a person has to make a statement to the police or the investigating authorities at the stage of investigations and interrogation. To this extent, this term has been wrongly used.

6. The sequence of events would reflect that investigations have taken its normal pace. No ad hoc arrests have been made. The employee concerned was permitted to be free without being called upon to make a statement, for the purpose of the judicial proceedings, for a considerable period of time. She has been permitted legal representation at the CID. Embassy officials were permitted to be present as observers at the point of recording her statement. All material emanating from the investigations and the surfacing evidence had been placed before Court.

7. In these circumstances, the BASL is of the view that the investigations in this case, have proceeded as expected by the law and on the basis of the normal legal norms accepted domestically and internationally.

The statement issued by the Swiss Government is a basic and a bare statement. Even though the statement makes an allegation of “due process” not being followed, the issuer of the statement has failed to identify, even a single ground that has not been followed by the law enforcement officers in this instance.

Due process” is a concept which can be traced back to the Magna Carta of 1215. The essential requirements of the “due process” laid down states that no person shall be arrested or produced or harassed without proper evidence or material or a charge.

8. In fact, a few weeks ago when a reference was made regarding the right of certain members of the legal profession to appear in this case on behalf of the Swiss Embassy, the BASL immediately issued a statement confirming that every person who is aggrieved or is a party to a court proceeding has a right of representation under our law.

The matter is before court and whenever a matter is sub judice, it is wrong and incorrect for statements to be made in respect of such matter before court. The statement issued by the Swiss Government dated 30th December 2019 violates this basic rule.

"Also, it is relevant to note that none of the lawyers representing the Swiss Embassy have gone down on record regarding the failure to observe "due process" as alleged in the statement.

"In these circumstances, the Bar Association of Sri Lanka strongly condemns the statement issued by the Swiss Government where it is alleged that the “due process” has not been followed. We request the makers of this statement to immediately disclose the areas of “due process” that have not been followed in this instance. Without mentioning such specific instances, to issue a general statement, as has been done in this instance, amounts to a serious undermining of the judiciary and the other law enforcement agencies in Sri Lanka which are more than equipped to follow the accepted norms.

"We request the Embassy to refrain from making such baseless statements and if there is any concern that they have, to bring it before the relevant forum without making ad hoc and inconsistent statements which undermines our legal system and the judiciary.

"Furthermore, being a responsible nation as claimed, the Government of Switzerland should be mindful of Article 41 of the Vienna Convention which clearly states that all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities have an equal duty to respect the Laws and Regulations of the receiving state, in this instance; Sri Lanka. It is further illustrated in Article 41 that there should not be any interference in the internal affairs of the state.

"It is best if the Government of Switzerland makes an attempt to understand their role in making comments about the judicial system and the law enforcement system of a separate, independent and a sovereign state.

"We strongly condemn the statement issued by the Swiss Embassy, as we see it as an attempt to undermine our core values in the judicial system which we have followed and treasured for more that 2 centuries."

http://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking_...SL-condemns-Swiss-Govt-s-statement/108-180730