It says Cheap Fertilizer... but doesn't say how cheap. In India it's only 10% cheaper than an equivalent sack of urea, but the advantage is in the absorption.
Pls refer to my previous post copied below....
"One 500ml bottle of nano-urea can replace one 45kg bag of conventional urea. About 30% to 50% of conventional urea does not get absorbed and hence wasted. But a nano urea liquid particle is 30 nanometre and compared to the conventional granular urea it has about 10,000 times more surface area to volume size. Due to the ultra-small size and surface properties, the nano urea liquid gets absorbed by plants more effectively when sprayed on their leaves.
This is what the Indian sources say."
PS: Only saw about the patent being sold to India... Anyone has proof of this? Who bought it? Any details welcome.
She currently holds the patent indicated below.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f7/39/2d/a03ffec7491384/US8696784.pdf
Ramesh Raliya hold a different patent...
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018005930A1/en
It's a very sad scenario when we cannot market our own inventions....
