Protection from Delta one year after mRNA-1273 vaccination in non-human primates

imhotep

Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,846
    8
    35,414
    113
    A recent preprint by a Harvard researcher Kizzmekia Corbett & her team discusses the vaccine effectiveness one year later based on trials on non-human primates. It's been noted from "Breakthrough Infections" that Moderna outperforms Pfizer, even both these use the same mRNA technology.

    Usually the correct approach is to perform a "Challenge trial" to ascertain the long term efficacy where the vaccinated individual is tested with the real pathogen itself. But with humans this cannot be done, due to ethical reasons, and hence performed using primates, in this case with Rhesus Macques. These primates share our genes to about 93% and are considered to be very good models to predict the outcomes on humans. So this team used these primates to test the vaccine efficacy.

    The monkeys were injected with two doses of Spikevax (Moderna) vaccine, four weeks apart and then monitored by taking blood samples at different time intervals over the next year. At the 49th week they were "Challenged" with the Delta variant and further blood samples were taken.
    These blood samples were used to test & analyze the ability of IgG antibodies contained to bind the RBD (receptor-binding domains) of three different viruses:
    • “Ancestral” SARS-CoV-2, which had the exact spike protein antigen encoded in the vaccine.
    • The Delta variant.
    • The Beta variant.

    The blood resident IgG provides a major part of the immunity. These IgG levels were highest at 6 weeks after vaccination for all three viruses; they then declined rapidly between 6 weeks and 24 weeks, and more slowly between 24 weeks and 48 weeks. Most IgG detected at 6 weeks bound ancestral virus, with 5.4-fold and 8-fold fewer IgG molecules binding the delta and beta variants, respectively. However, when delta and beta variant-specific IgG antibodies were tested for their ability to block binding between SARS-CoV-2 and its cognate ACE2 receptor, they inhibited almost 100% of binding of both delta and beta variant viruses, suggesting that the antibodies were still functional in preventing infection, in spite of their diminished quantity.

    After this they tested the nasal swabs and lung wash samples for Delta binding IgG & IgA antibodies. IgA antibodies dominantly present in mucosal surfaces and fluids. IgG behaviour was quite similar to the blood IgG as described above.
    IgG levels in the nose was increasing till week 25, and remained stable through week 42. IgA levels in the lungs were highest at week 6 and decreased to unvaccinated levels by week 24. But IgA levels in the nose were similar to those in unvaccinated animals at all time points.
    This difference between the lung & the nose, could explain why Covid vaccines are effective in preventing severe disease than preventing the infection itself.
    Also Rapid and sustained protection in upper and lower airways may eventually require a boost.

    The most interesting observation in the study relates to whether vaccinated individuals who become infected replicate and transmit virus to others. Analysis of lung wash samples for T cells specific for the SARS-CoV-2 N protein, which is not encoded in the Moderna vaccine, was only found the cells in unvaccinated animals.
    This shows that after one year of vaccination, immunized animals did not replicate specific T cells for Covid N protein possibly because the virus was cleared out quickly.

    PS: There are many other details in the preprint, available using this link.... https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.23.465542v1.full.pdf

    Kizzmekia_Corbett.jpg

    Dr Kizzmekia S Corbett is an US Immunologist who played a central part in developing the Moderna Vaccine. In February 2021, Corbett was highlighted in the Time's "Time100 Next" list under the category of Innovators.
     

    Dr.Sheldon_Suprakata

    Well-known member
  • Feb 7, 2018
    5,698
    1
    14,252
    113
    Couldn't find any credible source regarding the Sinopharm test results. Any idea? Different scenarios on different researches.
    However, I guess using a whole, inactivated version of a virus to stimulate an immune response is the safest method to date.
    But, don't know how long will immune last. (Not an expert) :baffled:

    The company detected the following antibody levels per vaccine:

    • Moderna: cc. 8,000 AU/mL
    • Pfizer/BioNTech: 5,600 AU/mL
    • AstraZeneca: cc. 1,550 AU/mL
    • Sputnik V: cc. 1,550 AU/mL
    • Sinopharm: cc 600 AU/mL
    Antibody levels are expressed in arbitrary units (AU) per millilitre. Anti-spike IgG values of ≥50 AU are interpreted as seropositive.

    The company adjusted the above data for the test results of those that had contracted coronavirus before their vaccination. Their antibody levels were north of the respective figures above, as a result of their pre-jab infection.

    The conclusion of the antibody tests is that the mRNA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech) trigger the highest antibody response, while adenovirus vaccines (AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sputnik V) trigger a smaller response, but still provide strong protection.

    QUESTIONS ARISE ONLY IN THE CASE OF CHINA’S SINOPHARM (INACTIVATED VIRUS), PARTICULARLY FOR THOSE OVER 60 YEARS OF AGE, IN WHICH GROUP A LOT OF PEOPLE HAD EXTREMELY LOW ANTIBODY LEVELS. SOME HAD NO PROTECTION WHATSOEVER, IN FACT.

    But the real mystery is why the hell government switched to a $15 Sinopharm vaccine, despite the fact that AstraZeneca is available for $5.
    Even they have a non-disclosure agreement too! Are we that RICH?
    Transparency is my ASS.
    :angry:

    News Report

     
    Last edited:

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,846
    8
    35,414
    113
    Couldn't find any credible source regarding the Sinopharm test results. Any idea? Different scenarios on different researches.
    However, I guess using a whole, inactivated version of a virus to stimulate an immune response is the safest method to date.
    But, don't know how long will immune last. (Not an expert) :baffled:



    But the real mystery is why the hell government switched to a $15 Sinopharm vaccine, despite the fact that AstraZeneca is available for $5.
    Even they have a non-disclosure agreement too! Are we that RICH?
    Transparency is my ASS.
    :angry:

    News Report


    Can you ever find any credible information from China? Since the dawn of history it's referred to as "The Empire of Lies". The word 'Truth" does not even exist in the Chinese vocabulary and hence you will realise that even to raise that question doesn't make sense.

    I had written previously why the West abandoned the inactivated Covid vaccines during the early stages. In brief it was mainly due to two reasons. The
    trials with mice showed incomplete protection and also an undesired effect of eosinophilic pulmonary inflammatory response. The incomplete protection (low efficacy) was suspected to be the result of BPL (β-propiolactone) used in the inactivation process.
    Otherwise inactivated vaccines are the easiest ones to manufacture.

    However, the French developer Valneva, (development started somewhere last September 2020) is trialing a vaccine that consists of inactivated whole virus particles of SARS-CoV-2 with high S-protein density, in combination with two adjuvants. They claim that these adjuvant combination has consistently induced higher antibody levels. Currently they just completed Phase III. The final data was in September 2021 and they have said that it's successful meeting both co-primary endpoints and with promising T-cell response.

    Also Bharat Biotech claims they overcame the low efficacy issue by using a different adjuvant. I have not read anything from them recently.

    As for how long the Covid vaccines really last in humans, all we know is that it varies from one individual to another and is also age-dependent. The older you are the faster you lose the immunity.
    But all recent research points that the vaccination provides a “higher, more robust, and more consistent level of immunity to protect people from COVID-19 than infection alone.” Those vaccinated after the infection are the best cohort in terms of protection. But scientists still don’t know precisely what level of antibodies will protect an individual.
    You will be better off with another shot six months after the previous vaccination.

    As to why we purchased Sinopharm could be due to several reasons. Sinopharm is readily available. Another very good reason is that NO vaccine maker will pay commissions EXCEPT the Chinese. Also there's the question of upfront payment. Chinese gave loans to everyone to buy their vaccines. You can just estimate the commissions. Previously I posted what other countries around our sector paid for Sinopharm. If I remember correct the cheapest was Thailand.

    There are a couple of Sino experts in here who are quite knowledgeable in Sinopharm (these guys know more than the Chinese developers) and in general know anything about Chinese. They will probably reply. :P