Life After Death : What is the reality ?

Mononoke

Member
Sep 12, 2009
443
7
0
the majority of the people of the world believe on the God and its existance.that is more than 70 % of world population. Lets ......

a long time ago 100% of the people believed that the earth was flat. Truth is not measured by mass appeal. If that were the case 'hit me baby one more time' by Britney Spears would be considered the epitome of human aesthetic expression, and not something like 'An Ode to Joy' or the Mona Lisa.
 

llrajitha

Well-known member
  • Jan 11, 2008
    6,971
    1,086
    113
    hey buddy like people nam eyi sattunta kata karanna beri :rofl: dekama compare karanna be

    අනේ පව්.. උඹලගේ කුරාන් එකේ bio lessons නැද්ද? :lol::lol::lol::lol:
    ඇයි උඹ ඔය හොඳට උම්බෑ කියන්නෙ :shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked:
     

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    a long time ago 100% of the people believed that the earth was flat. Truth is not measured by mass appeal. If that were the case 'hit me baby one more time' by Britney Spears would be considered the epitome of human aesthetic expression, and not something like 'An Ode to Joy' or the Mona Lisa.

    brother see why i have commented this that was due to the reaction of wal bada...read his comments
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    the majority of the people of the world believe on the God and its existance.that is more than 70 % of world population. Lets ......

    Not just majority but almost 100 per cent of world population believed that the earth was the center of the universe at some stage.

    The percentage of world population means nothing, my friend. Do you think a foolish belief can become a true fact just because many people believe it?
     

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    The percentage of world population means nothing, my friend. Do you think a foolish belief can become a true fact just because many people believe it?

    BROTHER YOU MEAN THAT ALL PEOPLE WHO BELEIVE ON THE EXISTANCE OF EITHER THEY BELONG TO MUSLIM, CRISTIAN, JEWS, ETC ARE ALL FOLISH, HAVE NOT SENSE.
    HAVE YOU NOT READ WHAT MUSLIM, CRISTIAN , JEWS SCIENTIST HAVE GIVEN TO MODERN WORLD....

    ALL THE MODERN SCIENCE AND INVENTIONS ARE THE WORK OF THESE SCIENTIST....FOR WHOME YOU ARE SAYING THEY HAVE FOOLISH BELIEF AND ARE IGNORANT FROM REALITY..
    WHAT YOU ARE SAYING..
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    BROTHER YOU MEAN THAT ALL PEOPLE WHO BELEIVE ON THE EXISTANCE OF EITHER THEY BELONG TO MUSLIM, CRISTIAN, JEWS, ETC ARE ALL FOLISH, HAVE NOT SENSE.
    HAVE YOU NOT READ WHAT MUSLIM, CRISTIAN , JEWS SCIENTIST HAVE GIVEN TO MODERN WORLD....

    ALL THE MODERN SCIENCE AND INVENTIONS ARE THE WORK OF THESE SCIENTIST....FOR WHOME YOU ARE SAYING THEY HAVE FOOLISH BELIEF AND ARE IGNORANT FROM REALITY..
    WHAT YOU ARE SAYING..

    Oh yes. Many 'A' class scientists and brilliant people have been very foolish in their beliefs. Former Indian President Abdul Kalam, India's No. 1 space scientist, strongly believes that Sai Baba can perform incredible miracles.

    Even Copernicus believed in astrology. :shocked:
     
    Last edited:

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    hafizsaad, I am awaiting for your reply for a long time. What have you got to say?

    Yes. A scientist is a specialist and a great man in his own field. In other beliefs, he can be as foolish as anyone else.
     

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    Oh yes. Many 'A' class scientists and brilliant people have been very foolish in their beliefs. Former Indian President Abdul Kalam, India's No. 1 space scientist, strongly believes that Sai Baba can perform incredible miracles.

    Even Copernicus believed in astrology. :shocked:

    you have given only name of one scientist ....

    see the links below


    The Scientific 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Scientists, Past and Present



    50 Nobel Laureates and Other Great Scientists Who Believe in God

    My purpose is not to take over weight on this topic but to remove your confusion humbly..
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    My point is not the number of scientists, hafizsaad. I can give you a long list of scientists who held false beliefs.

    My point is simple. Just because they are scientists, it does not mean that they are free of foolish beliefs.

    Scientists have done great service to mankind. But they also sometimes have very very foolish beliefs.
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    you have given only name of one scientist ....

    see the links below


    The Scientific 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Scientists, Past and Present



    50 Nobel Laureates and Other Great Scientists Who Believe in God

    My purpose is not to take over weight on this topic but to remove your confusion humbly..

    Not one of these scientists has done research on the existence of God. :rofl:

    We will definitely believe in God after scientists do research on that and prove scientifically that there exists a God/Allah. :rofl:
     

    Mononoke

    Member
    Sep 12, 2009
    443
    7
    0
    you have given only name of one scientist ....

    see the links below


    The Scientific 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Scientists, Past and Present



    50 Nobel Laureates and Other Great Scientists Who Believe in God

    My purpose is not to take over weight on this topic but to remove your confusion humbly..

    Your article is misleading. There are only 26 Nobel Award winning scientists there. Also this article quite liberally and falsely call people like Hume and mills theists. Hume was almost killed by the Scottish church for being an infidel. And Mills was an agnostic at best. And the majority of these people disapproved of the God in scripture, Einstein and Kant are prime examples of this.
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    Your article is misleading. There are only 26 Nobel Award winning scientists there. Also this article quite liberally and falsely call people like Hume and mills theists. Hume was almost killed by the Scottish church for being an infidel. And Mills was an agnostic at best. And the majority of these people disapproved of the God in scripture, Einstein and Kant are prime examples of this.

    you are giving the name of only two scientist, if you are true then give complete detail for all articles mentioned scientist....you can search ....more the einstein have the concept of God ...whether it's not match with scripture..they are not aheist..we are only talking about the scientist who have the concept of God, as you are exposing and denieding the whole two articles....it is the fact the atheist scientist are not more than 10 % of the whole scientist contribution to the modern world of science...may be you prove more than this by adding darwin like peoples as scientist....
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    Is God foolish?

    you have given only name of one scientist ....

    see the links below


    The Scientific 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Scientists, Past and Present



    50 Nobel Laureates and Other Great Scientists Who Believe in God

    My purpose is not to take over weight on this topic but to remove your confusion humbly..

    There are several Gods. Two of them are the Christian God and the Muslim God. :lol:

    The Christian God says, OK. It is good to take liquor/wine. But the Muslim God says it is haram. Both Gods cannot be correct. :no:

    One of the Gods must be wrong. Or, maybe both Gods are foolish! :sorry:
     

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    Mononoke, I even did not read the list. That is because a long list of scientists does not prove the existence of a God. :no:

    what prove the existance of God.....that was my response to your post in which you have given a name of scientist and asked no intelligent person can have the concept of God in other post.

    your upper statement means, if All the scientist in original had the concept of God they were ignorant foolish and silly.....and we are more intelligent....
    brother if you don't want to agree no one will impose and force you should convinced ....but the facts are facts either we convince or not...
     
    Last edited:

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    There are several Gods. Two of them are the Christian God and the Muslim God. :lol:

    The Christian God says, OK. It is good to take liquor/wine. But the Muslim God says it is haram. Both Gods cannot be correct. :no:

    One of the Gods must be wrong. Or, maybe both Gods are foolish! :sorry:

    every question has two purpose..
    1 - either the man want to know the reality and if he met with the reality he accept..
    2 - second purpose is just to make fool, criticize and abuse...what ever fact given his aim is only to refute....these type of peoples only waste the time and never can be guided to right and should not be answered

    can i ask from you..what is your purpose....?
     
    Last edited:

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    Scientists and God

    you have given only name of one scientist ....

    see the links below


    The Scientific 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Scientists, Past and Present



    50 Nobel Laureates and Other Great Scientists Who Believe in God

    My purpose is not to take over weight on this topic but to remove your confusion humbly..

    I have a long list of scientists who did not believe in God.:cool:

    Richard Dawkins is a world recognized scientist (biologist). He is living at present. He has written several books.

    In all the books, he says, belief in God is foolishness. :(

    Actually, his latest book is named 'The God Delusion'. :rofl:
     

    hafizsaad

    Member
    Dec 17, 2008
    728
    13
    0
    I have a long list of scientists who did not believe in God.:cool:

    Richard Dawkins is a world recognized scientist (biologist). He is living at present. He has written several books.

    In all the books, he says, belief in God is foolishness. :(

    Actually, his latest book is named 'The God Delusion'. :rofl:



    hoooo. richard dawkin is a scientist....brother i think the discussion on richard dawkin in many thread in this forum are complete and required no more comments...

    he is only favoured by atheist...debator of secondary school students and priest...

    i ask only one thing
    what dawkin has the contribution to the modern science ....only exposing the God with personal silly assumptions...

    our discussion was on famous scientist of past and present who has major contribution to science .....
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    what prove the existance of God.....that was my response to your post in which you have given a name of scientist and asked no intelligent person can have the concept of God in other post.

    your upper statement means, if All the scientist in original had the concept of God they were ignorant foolish and silly.....and we are more intelligent....
    brother if you don't want to agree no one will impose and force you should convinced ....but the facts are facts either we convince or not...

    No. I never said scientists are 'ignorant foolish and silly ..... and we are more intelligent'. :no:

    It is actually other way about. We are 'ignorant foolish and silly' and scientists are 'more intelligent', to use your own words.

    My point is, many scientists are 'ignorant foolish and silly' and we are 'more intelligent' when it comes to the belief in God/Allah/Yehovah or whatever you call that imaginary fellow.
     

    senator

    Member
    Jun 3, 2009
    922
    20
    0
    close to Colombo
    hoooo. richard dawkin is a scientist....brother i think the discussion on richard dawkin in many thread in this forum are complete and required no more comments...

    he is only favoured by atheist...debator of secondary school students and priest...

    i ask only one thing
    what dawkin has the contribution to the modern science ....only exposing the God with personal silly assumptions...

    our discussion was on famous scientist of past and present who has major contribution to science .....

    Are you serious? Do you say Richard Dawkins is not a scientist? If that is how you think, I do not see any purpose in talking to you. :no:

    OK. I can satisfy you by saying that Dawkins even does not have a doctorate! :rofl: