Are we trying to go back to the Sirimavo era?
lol , Its gud , If it ll happend, thn ppl realize , But not sure, Smtimes ppl will dedicate their lives on behalf of our gr8 king
PPL like to go in highways although they r in hunger.
That s all about our great ppl in Sri Lanka.
well, i think the fun really begins when the GSP is not granted and the 600,000 clothing garment people get on to the street jobless eh?
Let's see how fun will the country be then !
i deny ur allegation...the commonwealth election committee has never been cheated success even once....if MR pulled it off...he deserves it.....
lol...that is coz they were there every step...do you think they are sri lankan govt servants...eating tea and bun during working hours....
if they say so we have to believe them......they must have been very through...and no we can't complain like that coz we don't NEED to complain....they watch everything....
go to their site and look up "rules of engagement"...and you will understand why i am so sure abt this....look up "assurances" as well....just search it...should be third thing on list....forgot full heading...
do you know the difference between election Observers / Inspectors & Monitors ?
In another sense,
It's same as the difference between the Police / CID & Police Dog division.
Do you now understand the difference?
What usually comes when you call for the election monitors are the CID and the Police dog version of them ! so..... We had the "Police" here.. not the CID or the Dog Division
lol....so they also had these "police" they speak of....XD
http://www.thecommonwealth.org/press/31555/218953/210110stkitts.htm
that is from team going to saint-kitts....did they have MR-like person there too....
LMAO....dude u surprise me.....you are actually willing to try and put down the commonwealth to save SF.....
accept it.....we got a pretty strong team watching the elections compared to other countries and what they get for their elections...."police" or not...coz they say themselves...this time they wanted to be very sure....
http://www.thecommonwealth.org/document/34293/35144/186377/bangladesh_interim.htm
...or really....that report based on Bangladesh seem to point to more than mere amounts of observation....in fact it seems.....they went pretty deep with their observation...even enough to include their interactions between parties....
heck they say this is just a small report...a more detailed report is used internally.....
admit it man...the commonwealth is pretty through.....they take thier work seriously.....
.. but then again.. did you read the two reports and understood the finer difference between them? 
they do take their work seriously ... who said they don't?
Or are you just blissfully ignorant on that issue of screwing up your own self with your own proof
also, cut out the bold and big font in your replies. It's appalling and pretty sickening ! .. I am not blind.. so I can read fine print. No need to blow it up over proportion
ouch attacking my fonts...why.....
bottom line.....
1) the CW is quite serious wit its work...
2) humoring you...i would say....Its through enough.....
3) It carries its work in two sets....
4) CW has not yet been effectively cheated....in its history....
5) therefore i say...it least in the views of the CW....and taking into account their effectiveness....(especially since the force of the team we got).....this election was as fair as it gets.....
- The 29 December elections in Bangladesh for the 9th Parliament have been competitive and inclusive, with many of the basic rights and freedoms provided, once the State of Emergency had been fully lifted.
- Whilst some of the decisions and reforms instituted by the Caretaker Government and Election Commission may have proved unpopular with one party or another, and whilst some aspects do represent a more heavily regulated environment and framework, we feel the intention and outcome have been to achieve as credible an election as possible in an extremely polarized political environment.
- To this point in the process the Observer Group found that the election has been credible and met many of the benchmarks for democratic elections to which Bangladesh has committed itself. Particular mention must be given to the major effort involved in the successful registration of voters. The significantly improved voter list increased public and political confidence in the process and ensured that universal suffrage was largely provided for.
- The legal framework provided the basic conditions for genuine elections, such as the right of political parties and candidates to participate, provision of basic campaign freedoms and improved conditions for equal suffrage by the recent delimitation of 133 of the 300 constituencies.
- The State of Emergency did impact negatively on the environment in the build-up to the election, limiting basic rights and freedoms, including the ability of parties and individuals to associate freely and placing limitations on freedom of expression.
- During the campaign there were reports of some clashes between party activists, particularly in the build-up to election day, though thankfully these were of a limited and isolated nature.
- On the day of the election Commonwealth Observers reported from all six divisions. Whilst incidents were reported in some areas and some complaints filed with the Election Commission, overall Observers found people peacefully turned out to vote in extremely large numbers, the right to vote was provided for and people were free to express their will and cast a vote in secret. The tabulation and results processes were transparent, particularly as candidate agents could receive a certified copy of the result at the Polling Centre and individual Centre results were publicly posted at the site.
you tell me......so basically the fine print mean wat you make of it....with your pre-programmed biased outlook....i think not....
.. and I am not biased to Outlook (I use Thunder Bird and Linux) .. but I hate big bold font when you simply relay your message in fine print.
Non better than the Jihad fellow here who copy paste
Also, the main point of the whole discussion was not in the fact of the election it self. It was rather based on the manipulation of the results at the end of the day and rogue procedure followed through.
Follow the Iranian' election process and see how close approximate that it co-insides with ours.
Again, PLEASE , PLEASE, note that Commonwealth is only a observation body for any election which they are invited to. They are not inspectors or monitors !
What can I do/ say or SHOW you to understand the difference between the two ?
sheeezz.. some people got incredibly thick skulls don't they?
ouch attacking my fonts...why.....
bottom line.....
1) the CW is quite serious wit its work...
2) humoring you...i would say....Its through enough.....
3) It carries its work in two sets....
4) CW has not yet been effectively cheated....in its history....
5) therefore i say...it least in the views of the CW....and taking into account their effectiveness....(especially since the force of the team we got).....this election was as fair as it gets.....
- The 29 December elections in Bangladesh for the 9th Parliament have been competitive and inclusive, with many of the basic rights and freedoms provided, once the State of Emergency had been fully lifted.
- Whilst some of the decisions and reforms instituted by the Caretaker Government and Election Commission may have proved unpopular with one party or another, and whilst some aspects do represent a more heavily regulated environment and framework, we feel the intention and outcome have been to achieve as credible an election as possible in an extremely polarized political environment.
- To this point in the process the Observer Group found that the election has been credible and met many of the benchmarks for democratic elections to which Bangladesh has committed itself. Particular mention must be given to the major effort involved in the successful registration of voters. The significantly improved voter list increased public and political confidence in the process and ensured that universal suffrage was largely provided for.
- The legal framework provided the basic conditions for genuine elections, such as the right of political parties and candidates to participate, provision of basic campaign freedoms and improved conditions for equal suffrage by the recent delimitation of 133 of the 300 constituencies.
- The State of Emergency did impact negatively on the environment in the build-up to the election, limiting basic rights and freedoms, including the ability of parties and individuals to associate freely and placing limitations on freedom of expression.
- During the campaign there were reports of some clashes between party activists, particularly in the build-up to election day, though thankfully these were of a limited and isolated nature.
- On the day of the election Commonwealth Observers reported from all six divisions. Whilst incidents were reported in some areas and some complaints filed with the Election Commission, overall Observers found people peacefully turned out to vote in extremely large numbers, the right to vote was provided for and people were free to express their will and cast a vote in secret. The tabulation and results processes were transparent, particularly as candidate agents could receive a certified copy of the result at the Polling Centre and individual Centre results were publicly posted at the site.
you tell me......so basically the fine print mean wat you make of it....with your pre-programmed biased outlook....i think not....
