Questions about creations of the God

pavithra_uk

Well-known member
  • Oct 6, 2009
    53,441
    22,098
    113
    Gotland
    :rolleyes::rolleyes: :confused::confused: :confused::confused: :rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    මේ... මේ...
    මට කියනවද දෙවියන් මේ ලෝකය, සහ ග්‍රහ ලෝක මවනකන් හිටියෙ කොහෙද කියල ??



    :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     

    cd_akhila

    Member
    Feb 25, 2008
    106
    19
    0
    Sounds interesting. I think this might be a try to copy the church of FSM. But I think I want to join the church of satan for sometime. he he..
    maybe:yes: then because of fsm we know that we can create our own god,:) optimus prime is for those who dont like monsters, satans or murdering and wife beating gods.:rolleyes:

    Well I know that antirainman is a muslim who pretends to be a buddhist sometimes. He is here to insult buddhism. I've been checking out his activity and history.

    So my point is this guy is not really worth any attention. There are respectable muslims here, this guy is worthless.
    thats right:yes:


    So you think he is another ID of gazaly?
    yeah.. one of his ids..
     

    Juscurio

    Member
    Nov 11, 2010
    98
    7
    0
    666 = Satan

    1430729773.gif

    :angry:

    Kinda cool. I'm a satanist from now on. Have to check that out as my newest religion..

    Why did God create Satan? :shocked:
     
    Last edited:

    Juscurio

    Member
    Nov 11, 2010
    98
    7
    0
    ඒ ගැන වැඩිපුර දැන ගන්න පහත රූප පෙළ නරඹන්න.

    ඉන්ශාල්ලාහ් , කිසි දිනක දේව භාෂිතය ප්‍රශ්න නොකරන්න.





    මේක විහිලුවක්ද ? ඇත්තක්ද ? :rolleyes:

    කිසි දිනක දේව භාෂිතය ප්‍රශ්න නොකරන්න.

    ආදී කාලෙ වහල්ලු වගේ ඉන්නද කියන්නේ ? :angry:
     

    mensoft2003

    Member
    Sep 12, 2007
    1,776
    152
    0
    මේක විහිලුවක්ද ? ඇත්තක්ද ? :rolleyes:



    ආදී කාලෙ වහල්ලු වගේ ඉන්නද කියන්නේ ? :angry:

    ඔව් ඔව් නැතම් උඹට ෂෝන් දඩුවම ලැබෙයි .:lol::lol::lol: අසා නැද්ද හුරි කෙනෙක් ලැබෙනවට ? :P:P
     

    Juscurio

    Member
    Nov 11, 2010
    98
    7
    0
    මැවුම්වාදය ගැන නෙවෙයි අද ප්‍රශ්නයක් තියෙන්නේ. ලෝකය මැව්වේ මොන දෙවියාද කියන එක. අල්ලා දෙවියන්ද එහෙම නැත්නම් දෙවියන් වහන්සේද කියන එක. මේක ගැන හුඟක් විද්‍යාත්මක විවාද යනවා.


    මේ ලෝකේ මවපු දෙයක් නම් කවුද මැව්වේ කියන එක ප්‍රශ්නයක් තමයි. ඉස්ලාම් භක්තිකන් කියනවා අල්ලා දෙවියෝ කියල . කිස්තු භක්තිකයන් කියනවා දෙවියන්වහන්සේ කියල. තවත් මතයක් තියෙනවා මේ දෙන්නම එකයි කියල. ඔය දෙන්නගෙන් කවුරු වුනත් මවපු දෙයක් නම් මේක ඇයි මේ විදියට මැව්වේ කියන එක තමයි මට තියෙන ප්‍රශ්නේ
     

    Juscurio

    Member
    Nov 11, 2010
    98
    7
    0
    First we need to come to an agreement on which GOD we are talking about. There are hundreds of GODs and hundreds of definition. For now I'm assuming you are referring to the Abrahmic GOD
    I am talking about the God who is believed as the sole creator. Anyway I am more interested in talking about the creations.


    Now with your decision to talk about the GOD, you are agreeing to accept the definition of GOD. This includes GOD being all powerful and all knowing. So why do you think your understanding of a better way is really the better way? Are you claiming that you can analyze this better than GOD? Are you in a position to argue against GOD to say that suffering is unnecessary?
    I have mentioned this at the beginning of the thread. I find it difficult to difficult to believe in a supreme God because of these questions. I do not consider my way is better than the God or I can analyse better than the God. . My position………..Well, I am only a simple human being who finds it difficult to understand these problems. I am not here to argue with God, but to get reasonable answers to these questions


    What is the point of giving a cancer patient radiation treatment? This radiation is gonna make him suffer. But eventually he will get better
    Well, if he/she is lucky enough to survive the sickness he can be a better person. But some of these people suffer due to diseases and die without getting a chance to be better than what they are

    The example is not that suitable but lets assume this is the case. So what? Maybe that was the intention. There's no reason to say that the creation should be perfect
    I have seen small children enjoy themselves breaking what they make for fun.


    How do you know? Are you claiming that you have access to information that GOD does not
    Just look around you. You will see disabled people who were born as blind, deaf, crippled and etc.


    It's just a natural phenomenon. Care to explain your point more?
    They say that all these phenomenons were created by God. Some parents have completely different looking children. Sometimes there is no resemblance to any family member.


    This has to do with what people want in their life. If you want to be rich you go ahead and do it, no one is stopping you. And also it has something to do with something called luck. But the interesting thing is that,you seem to take being rich as an indication of happiness. In an obvious sense it looks like this. But think deeper and you'll realize happiness is something else. Maybe that's how GOD intended it too
    I am not talking about people getting rich after birth. I am talking about the way people were created. Some in rich families whereas others in poor families. I did not connect richness to happiness in any way. There are rich people who commit suicide due to unhappiness.


    Has to do with your life style right
    Not always

    Let me put more logic in to it. GOD does not owe any explanation to anyone why he did what he did. He has the power of creation and he will create it the way he want.
    There is no logic in your answer. How can you say that we are part of a creation? What is the proof you have? Some people believe that we are part of a creation because someone said so or it is there in a book. From those people only I am asking whether they can find sensible answers to these questions.

    If it doesn't make sense to you, well that's your fault not his.
    Well, I will take the above example again. A small child is making a castle on a sea shore and then breaks it for fun. This of course I can understand because he’s small/immature. But if there’s an adult who finds pleasure in making a building to collapse from one end it doesn’t make sense. Because he’s responsible for loss of lives.



    For an example: Assume I'm gonna create a DNA seeking missile. I'm the creator and I'll create it whatever the way I want. If I want I will send my son to you to explain how my creation work. You can chose to believe in the weapon and you can chose not to but, nevertheless it is there and it can effect you too.
    There’s a small mistake.
    He creates people with evil minds. Then send messengers with books to correct them. Is he unhappy with his own creations? No, it is not possible for the supreme God to make a mistake. Is it?

    Are you considering people as DNA seeking missiles? If so, you have to change your example. You make a DNA seeking missile. Then you send your son as a missile to correct the missile you have created.



    It is not possible for an OMNIMAX GOD to make a mistake. But on the other hand there is a big possibilty that you can make a mistake. Maybe your understanding is mistaken?

    True if there’s such a God. But because of these questions I find it difficult believe he exists.

    Thanks again :D
     
    • Like
    Reactions: DragonD

    AncientGlory

    Member
    Jan 18, 2010
    1,131
    67
    0
    Australia
    I have mentioned this at the beginning of the thread. I find it difficult to difficult to believe in a supreme God because of these questions. I do not consider my way is better than the God or I can analyse better than the God. . My position………..Well, I am only a simple human being who finds it difficult to understand these problems. I am not here to argue with God, but to get reasonable answers to these questions
    Every view is subjective. We all come to conclusions of our own. Obviously since you see errors in "GOD Concept" you will refuse it. It is ok to that you do not understand the questions, but it does not mean there aren't answers. How do you define reasonable? What is reasonable to me might not be reasonable to you.

    Well, if he/she is lucky enough to survive the sickness he can be a better person. But some of these people suffer due to diseases and die without getting a chance to be better than what they are

    I have seen small children enjoy themselves breaking what they make for fun.

    Just look around you. You will see disabled people who were born as blind, deaf, crippled and etc.

    They say that all these phenomenons were created by God. Some parents have completely different looking children. Sometimes there is no resemblance to any family member.

    I am not talking about people getting rich after birth. I am talking about the way people were created. Some in rich families whereas others in poor families. I did not connect richness to happiness in any way. There are rich people who commit suicide due to unhappiness.

    Not always
    All these questions come from the conclusion that the creation needs to be perfect in a sense that we understand "Perfect". So what if someone dies of disease, how is that an argument against GOD?

    There is no logic in your answer. How can you say that we are part of a creation? What is the proof you have? Some people believe that we are part of a creation because someone said so or it is there in a book. From those people only I am asking whether they can find sensible answers to these questions.
    Obviously you seem to have a different definition for "logic". You asked me why GOD create people with evil minds and send a messenger etc. I told you GOD does not owe an explanation. And you say there is no logic in it. Explain why there is no logic in my answer without asking irrelevant questions that has nothing to do with the answer. ex: What proof do you have that we are part of the creation??? What does that have to do with your original question. Do you call this logic?

    Well, I will take the above example again. A small child is making a castle on a sea shore and then breaks it for fun. This of course I can understand because he’s small/immature. But if there’s an adult who finds pleasure in making a building to collapse from one end it doesn’t make sense. Because he’s responsible for loss of lives.
    Why it doesn't make sense? Adults take lives of others every day. Are you saying being an adult should mean his behaviour must be always moral?

    There’s a small mistake.


    Are you considering people as DNA seeking missiles? If so, you have to change your example. You make a DNA seeking missile. Then you send your son as a missile to correct the missile you have created.
    And you say my answers are illogical. A DNA seeking missile is just an example. It is a weapon that can track the specific genetic code of an individual.