Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sachith19920726" data-source="post: 20459434" data-attributes="member: 330471">ඒක මාර සුට්ටක් නෙ මට රිදෙන්න කොහොමද ?ඔයාගෙ අදහස කියන්නෙ නිවැරදි අදහසද ? මාර උත්තක් නෙ ඒක <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" />Einstein ගෙ අදහස Einstein ගෙ quote එකක් අරගෙන පෙන්නපන්ඔයා කිව්වට බෑ නෙ.. අපි දැකල නැති එකක් තියනව නම් හොයල බලන්නම්..ඔයා නිවැරදී ඔයාගෙ අදහස තමයි හරි කියල ඔලුව ඉදිමවාගෙන පොස්ට් කරා කියල අනිත් උන් ඒක පිළිගන්න ඕන නැහැ නෙ <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /> 1) According to general relativity, the concept of space detached from any physical content does not exist. -EinsteinIf there is only empty space, with no suns nor planets in it, then space loses its substantiality -Buddha2) Physical concepts are free creations of the human  mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the  external world. -EinsteinAll such notions as causation, succession, atoms, primary  elements…are all figments of the imagination and manifestations of the  mind. -Buddha 3) Time and again the passion for understanding has  led to the illusion that man is able to comprehend the objective world  rationally by pure thought without any empirical foundations—in short,  by metaphysics. -EinsteinBy becoming attached to names and forms, not realising that they have  no more basis than the activities of the mind itself, error rises…and  the way to emancipation is blocked. -Buddha4) In our thinking…we attribute to this concept of  the bodily object a significance, which is to high degree independent of  the sense impression which originally gives rise to it. This is what we  mean when we attribute to the bodily object “a real existence.” …By  means of such concepts and mental relations between them, we are able to  orient ourselves in the labyrinth of sense impressions. These notions  and relations…appear to us as stronger and more unalterable than the  individual sense experience itself, the character of which as anything  other than the result of an illusion or hallucination is never  completely guaranteed. -EinsteinI teach that the multitudinousness of objects have no reality in  themselves but are only seen of the mind and, therefore, are of the  nature of maya and a dream. …It is true that in one sense they are seen  and discriminated by the senses as individualized objects; but in  another sense, because of the absence of any characteristic marks of  self-nature, they are not seen but are only imagined. In one sense they  are graspable, but in another sense, they are not graspable.  -Buddha</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom