ඇලිස්ගේ විස්මලන්තයෙන් බිඳක්

[MuslimLankan]

+ rep added thanx karapan mata

kohamada thread eka ? ela neda ?

rep dunnata bohama isthuthi

 

[MuslimLankan]

+ rep added thanx karapan mata

kohamada thread eka ? ela neda ?

rep dunnata bohoma isthuthi

 

[Mujaahid]

kohamada thread eka ? ela neda ?

rep dunnata bohama isthuthi

ela ela elamakiri thawa nadda??

 

[MuslimLankan]

ela ela elamakiri thawa nadda??

 

[k.s.a]

+ rep added thanx karapan mata

 

[dumasrc]

thanamalvila ganja othana umbalage jaathiye ewunge adyapana mattama gana api hondata dannawa. moke me umba mata poth kiyawala enna kiyanne ? umbala wage dawase pataw ekka tharka karanna apata poth one naha p*ko.

dan umba ai kathawa wena paththakata harawanna hadanne ? budu rajaanan wahanse uru le gana kiyalathiyena katha ahuwama umbata pissu double wenawada ?

koheda ban uru le gena kiyala thiyenne ubata thawelane ape jathiyath ekka kata nikan padikkama wage kunuharapenmai ai me thada wela cool

 

[lucky_lakshitha]

ලොල්

 

[dumasrc]

hikz

 

[njsa]

ඔන්න අපිට තවත් ලස්සන හැඩිතයක් හම්බුනා... මේකෙ කියල දෙන්නෙ කුකුලො කැ ගහන්නෙ බූරුවො කැගහන්නෙ ඇයි කියල.

4.522:
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "When you hearth crowing of cocks, ask for Allah's Blessings for (their cry indicates that) they have seen an angel. And when you hear braying of donkeys, seek Refuge with Allah from Satan for (their braying indicates) that they have seen a Satan."
කුකුලො කැගහන්නෙ ඒන්ජල්ල දැක්කමලු, බූරුවො කැ ගහන්නෙ සාතන් දැක්කමලු. ඒකනිස කුකුලො කැ ගහන කොට අල්ලගෙ බ්ලෙස් එක ඉල්ලන්නලු බූරුව කැ ගහනකොට අල්ලහගෙන් ගැලවීම ඉල්ලන්නලු..... මරු මෙයා මාර ලොජික්...

when this fool started to write a new hadees book??????
.when ever u mention a hadees,mention from which hadees book u copy that.do u have any idea what a hadees is?????

buddhist dont have any proof for there faith.just telling buddah said this and that,dont know from where they get these.
i think even never a buddhist saw a thripitaka from his own eyes???

in every muslim house there can get a quran and hadees books.so its very difficult to fool us but u just fooling ur self.

 

[AncientGlory]

.when ever u mention a hadees,mention from which hadees book u copy that.

njsa, what are the hadees books that you consider to be authentic? It seems that the answer to this question changes from person to person. So It's better to first know what you consider to be true books. I agree that when posting extracted verses, source should always be mentioned.

buddhist dont have any proof for there faith.just telling buddah said this and that,dont know from where they get these.

Buddhists do not have faith. They follow something because it makes sense. How ever I see the point that you try to make. But what you need to understand is that it doesn't really matter whether someone said those things or not. What matters is that it is logical. Buddhists don't follow something because it is written in a book. They follow it because the book makes sense, without the book itself stating "This Book is True". They are invited to challenge, ask questions think for themselves about what the philosophy teaches and then make a rational decision.

i think even never a buddhist saw a thripitaka from his own eyes???

Thripitaka is a book and it is not difficult to find. I think you you are talking about the original thripitakaya maybe? Of course people haven't seen it, just like you haven't seen the original quaran.

 

[Mujaahid]

when this fool started to write a new hadees book??????
.when ever u mention a hadees,mention from which hadees book u copy that.do u have any idea what a hadees is?????

buddhist dont have any proof for there faith.just telling buddah said this and that,dont know from where they get these.
i think even never a buddhist saw a thripitaka from his own eyes???

in every muslim house there can get a quran and hadees books.so its very difficult to fool us but u just fooling ur self.

bukari.. go and see ur self without being foolish here

 

[njsa]

bukari.. go and see ur self without being foolish here

we can see who is acting foolish here.anyway carry on with ur work.best of luck u losers!!!

 

[njsa]

Originally Posted by AncientGlory
njsa, what are the hadees books that you consider to be authentic? It seems that the answer to this question changes from person to person. So It's better to first know what you consider to be true books. I agree that when posting extracted verses, source should always be mentioned.

i think already me and many ek muslim members here had answered u this same question many times that what are the authentic books are.so i dont think its not really necessary to reply u again.but yet if ur expecting a reply i will give u.and u will never get a different reply from person to person in islam like buddhism.
what ever they post should be with a correct source for specially hadees.we dont have any problem for quran which cant be manipulated easily.


Buddhists do not have faith. They follow something because it makes sense. How ever I see the point that you try to make. But what you need to understand is that it doesn't really matter whether someone said those things or not. What matters is that it is logical. Buddhists don't follow something because it is written in a book. They follow it because the book makes sense, without the book itself stating "This Book is True". They are invited to challenge, ask questions think for themselves about what the philosophy teaches and then make a rational decision.

which make u sense doesnt make sense for me at all...
and u can just tell that buddhism is not a faith.but its a faith which believe in rebirth,hell&heaven also the concept of many gods.(as buddhism believe in free thinking u can't correct me in this.right????so its a faith and using the free thinking word so they can make a hole and escape in the places where they cant find an answer to the questions we ask.)
and may be buddhism is what u mentioned here but thats all because its just a human made thing.so buddah cant be sure about anything as he is a just an ordinary man with a new thinking(cant call it as new as well coz already hinduism had all these concepts.)


What make sense about Buddhism, can you elaborate further with examples? Something which is correct and make sense and logical for you, may not make sense for others, so who is ultimate decider as to what is correct.
Here a buddhist earlier was arguing that, after marriage sex is Ok.as long as the two likes each other. I feel some Buddhist may not agree with this policy. I don’t know what Buddhism say abt this?

Just to remind you that, we don’t blindly follow the book quran, it gives all proof for everything, tripitika is silent abt most of the things, and it leaves to the human brain to think everything with their own mind.doesn’t budhdism philosophy understand each human beings, has got his own mind set and thinking. How it is going to be unique decisions which is thought to be ‘make sense’ thoughts.

Thripitaka is a book and it is not difficult to find. I think you you are talking about the original thripitakaya maybe? Of course people haven't seen it, just like you haven't seen the original quaran.

what u mean by the original quran??????

we have the original in every house.
did u mean that the first copy of quran??????????? i thought u know that the first copy and the quran we are having now are same without even a single difference.
so don’t compare tripitika with our book.

 

[AncientGlory]

.and u will never get a different reply from person to person in islam like buddhism.

Really? Well I know couple of muslim people in this forum who do not believe that any hadeeth is to be taken seriously. And here now you are saying some hadeeths are to be taken seriously. That seems like different opinions to me. So yeah, each time I'm gonna have to ask about this individually coz opinions differ.

which make u sense doesnt make sense for me at all...

I'm not saying it will make sense to you. I'm saying that it makes sense to them. The reasons you are assuming buddhists are doing these things are not really the reasons they are doing it. I'm merely pointing that out.

and u can just tell that buddhism is not a faith.but its a faith which believe in rebirth,hell&heaven also the concept of many gods.

Buddhism is not a faith but a philosophy. The concepts of rebirth, hell and heaven and concepts of many gods, do not have the same meaning translated from the abrahamic religion texts. These concepts hold no core value in buddhism.

(as buddhism believe in free thinking u can't correct me in this.right????so its a faith and using the free thinking word so they can make a hole and escape in the places where they cant find an answer to the questions we ask.)

Did you ask any questions? I never saw one until now.

and may be buddhism is what u mentioned here but thats all because its just a human made thing.

Islam is also a human made thing. The difference is buddha claimed he is just an ordinary human, who understood the extraordinary, while Muhammad, said he is just a messengers from the GOD. I can see why you bring this point, but it really has no credible value in the argument. You can claim since GOD gave your religion, its superior to something brought by a man. But GOD is again an assumption in my part so my claim is what a man came up with is superior. There is no criteria to say which is right. Purely subjective view.

so buddah cant be sure about anything as he is a just an ordinary man with a new thinking

What poor logic. An ordinary man cannot be sure of anything? How about you? Are you an ordinary man? Are you not sure that sun gives us light? There are many things an ordinary man can be sure of.
Secondly, how can a man with a new thinking be ordinary? Einestein came up with new thinking and presented relativity. Is he ordinary?

(cant call it as new as well coz already hinduism had all these concepts.)

There are new concepts and there are concepts that were already there. Just like Islam. If you can, find me one single concept in Islam that was already not there in an older religion.

What make sense about Buddhism, can you elaborate further with examples?

(1) Time is not real but just a measurement of change. Change is continuous.

(2) There is a cause for an effect. Change happens because of causes. As long as there is a cause the effect will be there. Get rid of the cause the effect will disappear.

(3) The natural state of universe is not light(brightness). The absence of darkness is the light. Just like that absence of luxury("Sapa") is not suffering. Absence of suffering is luxury. Hence all that effect from causes has the natural tendency for suffering.

(4) And thereby

1. Suffering exists
2. Suffering arises from attachment to desires
3. Suffering ceases when attachment to desire ceases
4. Freedom from suffering is possible by practicing the Eightfold Path

(5) Do good deeds (Eightfold path)

etc....

Something which is correct and make sense and logical for you, may not make sense for others, so who is ultimate decider as to what is correct.

I'm not saying it should make sense to everyone. I'm just saying it makes sense to whoever can make something out of it. There need not be an ultimate decider.

Here a buddhist earlier was arguing that, after marriage sex is Ok.as long as the two likes each other. I feel some Buddhist may not agree with this policy. I don’t know what Buddhism say abt this?

I'm not sure about this. In my opinion, according to buddha sex is ok if it does not harm anyone. But is it a cause that will bind us to more change and suffering? yes. But I'm not an expert on this subject.

Just to remind you that, we don’t blindly follow the book quran, it gives all proof for everything,

Good to know that. I have still not finished reading it. So I might find these proofs you are talking about later.

tripitika is silent abt most of the things, and it leaves to the human brain to think everything with their own mind.

Good to know that you are reading tripitakaya. What things are you specifically talking about here?

doesn’t budhdism philosophy understand each human beings, has got his own mind set and thinking.

It understands this very well.

How it is going to be unique decisions which is thought to be ‘make sense’ thoughts.

I can't understand what you are trying to say.

what u mean by the original quran??????

we have the original in every house.
did u mean that the first copy of quran???????????

Yes.

i thought u know that the first copy and the quran we are having now are same without even a single difference.

So you haven't seen the original quran, but you have exact copies right? This is the same case with thripitakaya. It seems like you don't have much knoweledge about where thripitakaya was written and all that.

so don’t compare tripitika with our book.

I wouldn't even dream about it. The two books have nothing to compare within, entirely different concepts.

 

[AncientGlory]

We are going off topic by the way.