Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pessimist" data-source="post: 24664618" data-attributes="member: 566496">u are right. but did it ever occur to u that u can justify cannibalism along the same line ? when no one is volunteering to accept a corpse can u justify that since this body has no owner it's okay if some cannibal group cooked and ate it ?social norms and rules arent logical. they are intersubjective agreements to refrain from certain actions. some things are logical. but again that's only when u can logically infer the morality of that action from another set of norms. in that case what u are doing is using other norms as the logical foundation of ur conclusion. those who are opposing this action could be addressing those axioms. an unsound proposition based on one set of axioms can be sound in another set of axioms. just like cannibalism, dog meat, and many other things.besides modern day liberals has the best reason to oppose this. this is downright objectification of women.we already kill fishes and chickens. that doesnt imply we should also kill dogs and cats. logic alone can neither justify nor condemn an action.</blockquote>

Top Bottom