නාගානන්ද කතාව #1

[SimMaster]

අපි මේ කථාව විශ්වාස කරත්, නාගානන්දට මේ මැතිවරණයෙන් ප්‍රධාන පක්ෂ 2ට කිසිම තරගයක් දෙන්න බැහැනේ.
නාගානන්ද කරන්නේ ප්‍රගතිශීලී ජනතා විශ්වාසයක් යම් තරමකින් හරි දිනාගත්ත නායකයාට දාන්න තියෙන චන්ද කඩන එකනේ.
නාගානන්ද කරන්න ඕන එහෙනම් එහෙම වැඩිම ප්‍රසාදයක් දිනාගත්ත නායකයා එක්ක ගිවිසුම් ගතවෙලා එයා කියන විදිහේ ප්‍රතිපත්ති යම්තරමකින් වත් සමාජයට ඉෂ්ඨ කර ගැනීමේ අවංක උත්සාහයක් නම් ඒකනේ.
අපි නම් දකින්නේ ජනාධිපතිවරණයට ඉදිරිපත්වීමේ නියම් හෝ අනියම් ප්‍රතිලාභ පිණිස පිල්ලියක් වෙන බවක් විතරයි.

මේක බලන්නකො මචං

 

[Hyaenidae]

no president shouldnt be a politician. when president is a leader of a political party he has scratch the back of he political party o keep his power. most of countries problems traced back to this reason.( political appointments, disregard to rule of law, abuse of government property etc) so thats why we should vote for non-politico. ofcource you agree with me

Going by this logic aristocracy would be the best governing form ever, but we know that is not the case don't we? The president should have a strong presence in the parliament - or else he'd be just a figurehead while the PM runs the show.

mchn mchn here we go round and round. please open your eyes .there is a difference between assumption and fact.
that trivial incident caused loss of a life. it could have been more including our world cup winning captain. if a person has so much disregard to human life is he suitable to lead a nation?
if i care i can dig out so many evidence to support my claim. but for a change can you show me single piece of evidence to support your assumption.
i am done here. but you should be ashamed to insult your own intelligence this way.

If I had any doubt that you're a troll this shit proves it. How could you victimize your "world cup winning captain" when he was the one who caused the whole altercation by trying to force his way in? He could've defused the whole situation by just leaving, but obviously he had something to hide, some damning evidence of his corruption to get rid of, so he forced his way in by ordering his armed guards to shoot at unarmed people. If anyone has no regard for human life that would be your frigging "world cup winning captain", not MR.

 

[senal neveyi]

Going by this logic aristocracy would be the best governing form ever, but we know that is not the case don't we? The president should have a strong presence in the parliament - or else he'd be just a figurehead while the PM runs the show.

you are not even trying to understand what i am saying . president should be elected but while he hold the office he should not practice party politics. if you consider all he past presidents their political parties were the main reason for their downfall . we obviously know that will never happen with MR or SP. if we can have a president without a political party to protect that is the optimum solution(remember political parties aim next election but president should aim next generation)( for he record aristocracies have a class to protect furthermore they are not responsible to general public. so your example is baseless-but indeed our leaders have acted as aristocracies all the time)

If I had any doubt that you're a troll this shit proves it. How could you victimize your "world cup winning captain" when he was the one who caused the whole altercation by trying to force his way in? He could've defused the whole situation by just leaving, but obviously he had something to hide, some damning evidence of his corruption to get rid of, so he forced his way in by ordering his armed guards to shoot at unarmed people. If anyone has no regard for human life that would be your frigging "world cup winning captain", not MR. [/SIZE]

bro are you using internet explorer? watch following CCTV footage.
despite his political tenure i immensely respect arjuna for what he has done for our country( same goes for sanath,murali ,MR, GR,SF,Karannagoda etc). I ofcource worry if any danger to come to any of them.

you have proved that you are not different from erozan . i have wasted enough time in a wild goose chase trying convince a blind person. you can pretend to sleep ,i will not waste my time any further trying to wake you up.

And sincerely hope you are using different decision making system in your real life unlike your political life where facts and evidence sidelined to allow your assumptions and hopes to make decisions.

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.-Martin Luther King, Jr.( not very suitable quote but you get the idea.)

 

[Hyaenidae]

if we can have a president without a political party to protect that is the optimum solution

Pray explain how this is the optimum solution to curb the corruption of the political parties.

bro are you using internet explorer? watch following CCTV footage.

This is not "the CCTV footage", this is the incident being explained in minister's perspective, or the perspective that is most preferable for the minister The fact remains that if he was really there to collect a key he didn't have to be there at all, he could've left and sent someone else or better yet, inform proper authorities before causing a full-blown riot

 

[senal neveyi]

Pray explain how this is the optimum solution to curb the corruption of the political parties.

Are you blind or what? do I need to explain everything in detail

no president shouldnt be a politician. when president is a leader of a political party he has scratch the back of he political party o keep his power. most of countries problems traced back to this reason.( political appointments, disregard to rule of law, abuse of government property etc) so thats why we should vote for non-politico. ofcource you agree with me



mchn mchn here we go round and round. please open your eyes .there is a difference between assumption and fact.
that trivial incident caused loss of a life. it could have been more including our world cup winning captain. if a person has so much disregard to human life is he suitable to lead a nation?
if i care i can dig out so many evidence to support my claim. but for a change can you show me single piece of evidence to support your assumption.
i am done here. but you should be ashamed to insult your own intelligence this way.

This is not "the CCTV footage", this is the incident being explained in minister's perspective, or the perspective that is most preferable for the minister The fact remains that if he was really there to collect a key he didn't have to be there at all, he could've left and sent someone else or better yet, inform proper authorities before causing a full-blown riot

watch the CCTV without voiceover then. does it make difference. you not saying those who storm the office are not criminals and AR is not thye victim here?
how could AR leave when door is guarded by your master's watchdogs? inform proper authorities?lol didnt you police is already their but they were not brave enough to interfere the licenced criminals. is your proper authority is MR himself and you suggesting AR should have called MR and begged for mercy. if you dont accept what is clearly shown on video there is no point in speaking any further.
Those criminal local council members are very lucky to be born here because only here we have educated fellows blindly believing them protecting them and even voting them.

I will not reply you any further because its like teaching physics to erozan. have a good day.

 

[Hyaenidae]

Are you blind or what? do I need to explain everything in detail

You haven't explained how having an impartial president is going to dissuade corrupt politicians from doing their "thing".

watch the CCTV without voiceover then. does it make difference. you not saying those who storm the office are not criminals and AR is not thye victim here?
how could AR leave when door is guarded by your master's watchdogs? inform proper authorities?lol didnt you police is already their but they were not brave enough to interfere the licenced criminals.

Like I said this is not "the CCTV footage". This is the selective CCTV footage released by whoever did the voiceover. AR's armed guards didn't shoot an unarmed man while trying to get AR out of the building or in self-defence.

 

[SimMaster]

 

[k.k.mohmad]

 

[k.k.mohmad]