Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bambuwathamai" data-source="post: 30951652" data-attributes="member: 547421">Army did not fire on the civilians because Shavendra controlled the situation. In nepal 19 civilians were killed.Gota also had the presence of mind to resign, despite objections from pohottu fractions.. Had he held on, it would have been even more violent. In nepal, the PM hamu mahattaya decided to cut of social media and hold on to his power despite the protests, which finally ended up in violence..Finally, if pohottu gang did not attck the aragalaya it would have been a peaceful struggle.Ranil did nothing but opportunistically grab power which was bestowed on to him by the pohottu gang to save their own skins. He also appointed the thug deshabandu as IGP, the first criminal to be appointed as IGP.Sri lanka is different to nepal and bangladesh, because of the actions of Gota, Shavendra and the people in general. Definitely not because of Ranil or ponna slaves</blockquote>

Top Bottom