Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Baseus PI LITE INDOOR CAMERA
ErMurazor
Updated:
Monday at 12:26 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
Hard Disk For Sale
mazza
Updated:
Saturday at 10:23 PM
land for sale
justasking
Updated:
Saturday at 9:32 AM
AMD AM 5 Ryzen setup
prabodhamadusanka
Updated:
Thursday at 12:56 PM
Gampaha
ACER OKW223 Wired RGB Keyboard
chint
Updated:
Thursday at 10:17 AM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
රෝහිත_රාජපක්ෂ_Song
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rajitha_ks" data-source="post: 19747993" data-attributes="member: 162025"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Research Topic: Mathematical optimization of space debris mitigation and Strategy analysis</span></strong></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Group:</strong>Dr. JK Wijeratne, <a href="http://science.cmb.ac.lk/contact-us/contacts/?contact_id=224" target="_blank">Mr. C.R Rajapaksa.</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://science.cmb.ac.lk/contact-us/contacts/?contact_id=224" target="_blank"></a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://science.cmb.ac.lk/contact-us/contacts/?contact_id=224" target="_blank"></a></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">Space activities conducted by humans on Earth orbit began with the first launch of the artificial satellite Sputnik1 in 1957. Since then, orbital debris has increased with time and approximately 19,000 objects larger than 10cm and approximately 500,000 particles between 1 and 10 cm’s exist in space and probably tens of millions of particles smaller than 1cm roams in orbit today. U.S. Space Surveillance Network tracks larger orbital objects (> 10cm) and approximately 15,000 objects were in their catalogue as of 1st May 2010. Fifty percent of all orbital debris is vulnerable to collisions, which result in fragmentation of debris and that leads to a rise in the debris populations in the future even in the absence of future space launches.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"> Mechanisms for Removing or reducing space debris</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">1) Minimizing the break up potential during operational phases</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">2) Limiting the accidental collision in orbit</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">3) Avoiding intentional destructive and harmful operations (deliberate collisions) in orbit</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">4) Limiting debris released during normal operations</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">5) Limiting long-term presence of launch vehicle and the spacecraft in low earth orbit (LEO) region and geosynchronous (GEO) region after end of their missions</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">6) Taking active measures to deorbit or move debris to alternative orbits</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">From the above mechanisms, the active measures to deorbit the debris object have been chosen for the suggesting study. The international space community has focused on debris mitigation measures that lasted a decade, and they have introduced policies and guidelines to address these issues. In 2007, the United Nations adopted space debris mitigation guidelines. However, adopting these guidelines was not sufficient to stabilize the LEO debris environment, nevertheless active debris removal methods may help to control the situation. Moreover, active debris removal methods will enhance the reliability of future space systems. These methods need to address technological, financial and political constraints when being implemented. Furthermore, these systems should identify effective mitigation and removal strategies based on reliability, robust criteria and appropriate performance metrics. Previous studies used high-definition models of space debris environment to select these criteria and metrics on a relatively ad-hoc basis. Therefore, there is still a current requirement to identify a potentially optimal solution for space debris removal.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">This field of research commenced more than twenty-five years ago and numerous methods were proposed to remove large debris.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Objectives of the research</strong></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">It is suggested that when a single vehicle attempts to carry severaldeorbiting packages within different inclinations, even at same altitudes it requires a very high fuel mass and delta-v due to the plane changes that should be attended by the spacecraft. Equipped iron engines with satellites could also be used to direct debris back to the earth’s atmosphere. However, due to the high-energy requirements, this was also not worth being operational in the past. In addition, it requires a long-term power source and attitude control sub systems. This implies a practical approach to orbital debris removal process that needs to be developed more thoroughly to adopt a feasible system. This leads the main objective of the this research to find the best optimum solution to deorbit the debris to a position approximately below 100km of altitude to completely decay the debris object in the earth’s atmosphere. The optimum solution will be future analyzed to give out the best mission options in order to identify the most effective sequence of debris that needs to be de-orbited with priority. Technical communities have focused to obtain precise information about debris via the SGP4 model as it helps to predict these orbital debris objects more effectively. Consequently, the author of this study decides to use the SGP4(Simplified General Perturbation) model</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">මුගෙ research project එක</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">http://science.cmb.ac.lk/departments/mathematics/research/postgraduate-research-projects/</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rajitha_ks, post: 19747993, member: 162025"] [B][SIZE=3]Research Topic: Mathematical optimization of space debris mitigation and Strategy analysis[/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3][B]Group:[/B]Dr. JK Wijeratne, [URL="http://science.cmb.ac.lk/contact-us/contacts/?contact_id=224"]Mr. C.R Rajapaksa.[/URL][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][URL="http://science.cmb.ac.lk/contact-us/contacts/?contact_id=224"] [/URL][/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3][B]Introduction:[/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]Space activities conducted by humans on Earth orbit began with the first launch of the artificial satellite Sputnik1 in 1957. Since then, orbital debris has increased with time and approximately 19,000 objects larger than 10cm and approximately 500,000 particles between 1 and 10 cm’s exist in space and probably tens of millions of particles smaller than 1cm roams in orbit today. U.S. Space Surveillance Network tracks larger orbital objects (> 10cm) and approximately 15,000 objects were in their catalogue as of 1st May 2010. Fifty percent of all orbital debris is vulnerable to collisions, which result in fragmentation of debris and that leads to a rise in the debris populations in the future even in the absence of future space launches.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3] Mechanisms for Removing or reducing space debris[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]1) Minimizing the break up potential during operational phases[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]2) Limiting the accidental collision in orbit[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]3) Avoiding intentional destructive and harmful operations (deliberate collisions) in orbit[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]4) Limiting debris released during normal operations[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]5) Limiting long-term presence of launch vehicle and the spacecraft in low earth orbit (LEO) region and geosynchronous (GEO) region after end of their missions[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]6) Taking active measures to deorbit or move debris to alternative orbits[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]From the above mechanisms, the active measures to deorbit the debris object have been chosen for the suggesting study. The international space community has focused on debris mitigation measures that lasted a decade, and they have introduced policies and guidelines to address these issues. In 2007, the United Nations adopted space debris mitigation guidelines. However, adopting these guidelines was not sufficient to stabilize the LEO debris environment, nevertheless active debris removal methods may help to control the situation. Moreover, active debris removal methods will enhance the reliability of future space systems. These methods need to address technological, financial and political constraints when being implemented. Furthermore, these systems should identify effective mitigation and removal strategies based on reliability, robust criteria and appropriate performance metrics. Previous studies used high-definition models of space debris environment to select these criteria and metrics on a relatively ad-hoc basis. Therefore, there is still a current requirement to identify a potentially optimal solution for space debris removal.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]This field of research commenced more than twenty-five years ago and numerous methods were proposed to remove large debris.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3][B]Objectives of the research[/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]It is suggested that when a single vehicle attempts to carry severaldeorbiting packages within different inclinations, even at same altitudes it requires a very high fuel mass and delta-v due to the plane changes that should be attended by the spacecraft. Equipped iron engines with satellites could also be used to direct debris back to the earth’s atmosphere. However, due to the high-energy requirements, this was also not worth being operational in the past. In addition, it requires a long-term power source and attitude control sub systems. This implies a practical approach to orbital debris removal process that needs to be developed more thoroughly to adopt a feasible system. This leads the main objective of the this research to find the best optimum solution to deorbit the debris to a position approximately below 100km of altitude to completely decay the debris object in the earth’s atmosphere. The optimum solution will be future analyzed to give out the best mission options in order to identify the most effective sequence of debris that needs to be de-orbited with priority. Technical communities have focused to obtain precise information about debris via the SGP4 model as it helps to predict these orbital debris objects more effectively. Consequently, the author of this study decides to use the SGP4(Simplified General Perturbation) model[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]මුගෙ research project එක[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]http://science.cmb.ac.lk/departments/mathematics/research/postgraduate-research-projects/ [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom