Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vandey" data-source="post: 27427500" data-attributes="member: 512761">Valid point.There is a proper way to adopt a fully successful agile framework and companies do it. To understand this you need to know the framework well and develop an agile mindset.If you keep adding new features to the sprint backlog during the sprint then you lose the whole purpose of agile. i.e. incremental delivery/timeboxingHowever, when you list the features in the SB you calculate the team velocity and most probably keep a buffer of 10%, this is mainly for bug fixes, not new features.Also, tailoring happens, in scrum, there are mandatory components (Eg: you must conduct all the 5 scrum events) and the rest can be tailored as per your business need. However, adding features to an ongoing sprint violates the scrum methodology. You fall into a mini waterfall!Hybrid is a solution for the issue you stated. Also scaled agile can be implemented based on the size of the operation.Coming back to my question; I wanted to know which companies practice Agile as Agile, not hybrid, not predictive. Just pure Agile.</blockquote>

Top Bottom