Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Jul 19, 2026
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
✈✈ Aviation ✈✈
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hashan dis" data-source="post: 18683595" data-attributes="member: 124785"><p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">"Let’s look at the perennial white elephant Mattala Airport. Four-lane highway to bring and take out passengers, but no passengers! Runway strength and length to land the heaviest and the largest modern skybirds, but no planes! Fancy appearance and fancier electronics with instrument landing systems, but some fool forgot to have a taxiway for the jets to enter the runway without doing a 180- turn at the end. That is unbelievably stupid as whoever made that decision sure did not know anything about international aerodromes. I am not even mentioning runway alignment and cross winds, that is trivia relative to the ‘no taxiway’ construction. I read in the papers someone advising COPE that the airport earned a lot of money from over-flying traffic as Airlines flew the route because Mattala was there to land in case of emergency. Tomorrow you set fire to Mattala, the planes will still fly the same route without batting an eye-lid. That I know for sure for I have been in that sky for a very long time flying very heavy aeroplanes all over the world.</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Just for comparison, San Francisco International has many runways and the longest is 3,600 meters in length and 45 meters wide. Mattala is 3,500 meters long and 60 meters wide. Wider than SFO and only short by 100 meters – but brilliantly designed taxi-way – my foot!</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Now let’s get back to a simple argument, kindergarten style.</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">Someone built Mattala and another closed it and the cost was borne by the coffers of the motherland. Well! One of them has to be wrong, either the builder or the ‘shut it down’ man. But looks like no one is at fault? The reason is simple, in politics "though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow." So the Mattala saga continues, maybe the regimes will change and we get back to square one and Mattala will strive again. But I still like to know who built that stupid taxiway in a modern airport for aeroplanes to do 180- turns to line up for takeoff."</span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=128362" target="_blank">http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=128362</a></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">full </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 12px">article </span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align: left"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></strong>Capt. Elmo Jayawardena the island paper ekata liyapu article ekaka</p> <p style="text-align: left">kotasak meka.anith kotas nam aviation walata sambanda ne </p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left"></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hashan dis, post: 18683595, member: 124785"] [LEFT][B][SIZE=3]"Let’s look at the perennial white elephant Mattala Airport. Four-lane highway to bring and take out passengers, but no passengers! Runway strength and length to land the heaviest and the largest modern skybirds, but no planes! Fancy appearance and fancier electronics with instrument landing systems, but some fool forgot to have a taxiway for the jets to enter the runway without doing a 180- turn at the end. That is unbelievably stupid as whoever made that decision sure did not know anything about international aerodromes. I am not even mentioning runway alignment and cross winds, that is trivia relative to the ‘no taxiway’ construction. I read in the papers someone advising COPE that the airport earned a lot of money from over-flying traffic as Airlines flew the route because Mattala was there to land in case of emergency. Tomorrow you set fire to Mattala, the planes will still fly the same route without batting an eye-lid. That I know for sure for I have been in that sky for a very long time flying very heavy aeroplanes all over the world. Just for comparison, San Francisco International has many runways and the longest is 3,600 meters in length and 45 meters wide. Mattala is 3,500 meters long and 60 meters wide. Wider than SFO and only short by 100 meters – but brilliantly designed taxi-way – my foot! Now let’s get back to a simple argument, kindergarten style. Someone built Mattala and another closed it and the cost was borne by the coffers of the motherland. Well! One of them has to be wrong, either the builder or the ‘shut it down’ man. But looks like no one is at fault? The reason is simple, in politics "though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow." So the Mattala saga continues, maybe the regimes will change and we get back to square one and Mattala will strive again. But I still like to know who built that stupid taxiway in a modern airport for aeroplanes to do 180- turns to line up for takeoff." [URL]http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=128362[/URL] full [/SIZE][/B][B][SIZE=3]article [/SIZE][/B]Capt. Elmo Jayawardena the island paper ekata liyapu article ekaka kotasak meka.anith kotas nam aviation walata sambanda ne [/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom