2nd plane eka Remote Control da.

Aug 19, 2008
11,653
167
0
Sri Lanka

:frown:
Since there is not a sngle piece of the pilot's body,
it may have been controlled by a remote control.

On the other hand they look like
a primitive group of terrorist
with a mouth like Sakwithi.
I doubt their technical knowledge.
Just because they have 2- little planes
some hailed them as the only terrorist group who had planes.

Since LTTE were in Sri Lanka they were so safe.
They came, they dropped a bomb to kalanitissa
and went back without a scratch.
If other terrorist groups had them
they would have been shot down
within minutes they were airborne.
:lol::lol::lol:

 

cqruwan1200

Well-known member
  • Nov 20, 2008
    3,705
    44
    48
    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    :frown:
    Since there is not a sngle piece of the pilot's body,
    it may have been controlled by a remote control.​

    On the other hand they look like
    a primitive group of terrorist
    with a mouth like Sakwithi.
    I doubt their technical knowledge.
    Just because they have 2- little planes
    some hailed them as the only terrorist group who had planes.​

    Since LTTE were in Sri Lanka they were so safe.
    They came, they dropped a bomb to kalanitissa
    and went back without a scratch.
    If other terrorist groups had them
    they would have been shot down
    within minutes they were airborne.
    :lol::lol::lol:

    Umbata Pissuda???
     

    jayanthah

    Member
    Oct 19, 2007
    5,392
    18
    0
    Melbourne
    Bull shit...........Kamikazes operated by remote controll???? Mate are you dreaming or something wrong with you..........................on the second point..........yes we saw the "GREAT" US Airforce bringing down the planes before they attack WTC..............they just watched helplessely..........& Indian Army took............how many (5days) to kill 10 terrorists..........................................

    YOU HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM BRO...................
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    jayanthah said:
    Bull shit...........Kamikazes operated by remote controll???? .yes we saw the "GREAT" US Airforce bringing down the planes before they attack WTC..............they just watched helplessely..........& Indian Army took............how many (5days) to kill 10 terrorists.......
    All these are dramas Brother played By Govts on people or thei sheer disability. Govt like to show that terrorist they fight are very powerful for at the end they look more powerful.
    It is a principle used in books and movies. More powerful a villain, hero looks more heroic.
    If you have seen the rd Terminator movie, you know what I mean.
    I too like the entertainments they offer. But I like to look beyond. I try to see whether there are others who enjoy that part.
    There is a movement in USA to probe into it for they are a scientific nation.. the most powerful nation... They suspect that the Bush administration planned it
    Read the 9/11 threads for details, since you have the power to doubt.. use it with inquisitiveness.

    Read this
    1) AWOL Chain of Command
    a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
    b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.

    2) Air Defense Failures
    a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
    b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
    c. Was there an air defense standdown?

    Remote Control and the 9/11/01 Attack

    Imagining that teams of hijackers could successfully take over four jetliners then flawlessly fly three of them into relatively small targets, even though none had ever flown a jet, requires enormous leaps of faith. In contrast, robotically flying the jetliners into their targets could have been accomplished using the flight control computers that were standard equipment on the targeted planes.
    All modern jetliners have sophisticated flight control computers, which allow the planes to be flown with at least the precision of a skilled human pilot. The 757s and 767s used in the 9/11/01 attack were developed in the 1970s and employ similar avionics. Both contain integrated flight management computer systems (FMCS) which provide automatic guadance and control of the aircrat "from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing." [SIZE=-1] 1 [/SIZE]
     
    Last edited:

    jayanthah

    Member
    Oct 19, 2007
    5,392
    18
    0
    Melbourne
    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    Read this
    1) AWOL Chain of Command
    a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
    b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.

    2) Air Defense Failures
    a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
    b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
    c. Was there an air defense standdown?

    Thanks for the info.......................:rolleyes: as if I'm interested...........

    Why did you say then that any other nation would have put down those planes as soon as they take off???????

    You doing all this for attention, right? No difference between the govts & you (TYPICAL JOURNALISM)
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    DJ ASHAN said:
    ewa rimote ewa neme
    1 man yanna puluwan pody plane

    Remote weda karanna hadanna berida...
    Dura aran yanna, kohetawath bassanna nemeine.. Nikanm keli gihin happenna hadanna berida.. Den office eke indan gedara paalanaya karanna remote control thiyenne. Oka mokakda.;)

    Remote newei nam ko pilotge body eka.. Plane eka lock karala pilot parashot eken panna wenna barida.
     

    pagani

    Active member
  • Sep 16, 2006
    1,418
    4
    38
    AtulaSiriwardane said:

    :frown:
    Since there is not a sngle piece of the pilot's body,
    it may have been controlled by a remote control.

    On the other hand they look like
    a primitive group of terrorist
    with a mouth like Sakwithi.
    I doubt their technical knowledge.
    Just because they have 2- little planes
    some hailed them as the only terrorist group who had planes.

    Since LTTE were in Sri Lanka they were so safe.
    They came, they dropped a bomb to kalanitissa
    and went back without a scratch.
    If other terrorist groups had them
    they would have been shot down
    within minutes they were airborne.
    :lol::lol::lol:


    Yep they were safe until 2004
    SLAF can shot down the plane in a minutes, but How? can they shot down a plane in a highly residential area ?
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    gayajith said:

    Who runs this website? They also show only one dead pilot.
    UNP always says that Govt works with LTTE... and they helped Mahinda to win Presidential election.May be true because LTTE stopped lot of votes Ranil could have got because of Satan Viramaya.
    Who knows...?
    I start to feel that they may be right, for it seems that they try to prove what Govt say,...

    Who released that photo... Can't it be an old one... ? Who compared it with the body they found.. The body was intact. But in the photos they didn't show the face clearly.

    All this is very confusing...:no: We would never know... but we can try..
    At least mind will be sharper by thinking.:)
     
    Last edited:

    pagani

    Active member
  • Sep 16, 2006
    1,418
    4
    38
    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    UNP always says that Govt works with LTTE... and they helped Mahinda to win Presidential election.May be true because LTTE stopped lot of votes Ranil could have got because of Satan Viramaya.
    Who knows...?
    I start to feel that they may be right, for it seems that they try to prove what Govt say,...

    All this is very confusing...:no: We would never know... but we can try..
    at least mind will be sharper by thinking.:)


    Patta porak ne ban uba.

    LTTE stopped lot of votes Ranil ? but how ? Ae votes okkoma ranil ta keyala uba hithanawada.
     

    Similar threads