Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AtulaSiriwardane" data-source="post: 4029955" data-attributes="member: 120286">All these are dramas Brother played By Govts on people or thei sheer disability. Govt like to show that terrorist they fight are very powerful for at the end they look more powerful.It is a principle  used in books and movies. More powerful a villain, hero looks more heroic.If you have seen the rd Terminator movie, you know what I mean.I too like the entertainments they offer. But I like to look beyond. I try to see whether there are others who enjoy that part.There is a movement in USA to probe into it for they are a scientific nation.. the most powerful nation... They suspect that the Bush administration planned itRead the 9/11 threads for details, since you have the power to doubt.. use it with inquisitiveness.Read this 1) AWOL Chain of Commanda. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers. b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying. 2) Air Defense Failuresa. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights. b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable. c. Was there an air defense standdown? Remote Control and the 9/11/01 Attack   Imagining that teams of hijackers could successfully take over four jetliners then flawlessly fly three of them into relatively small targets, even though none had ever flown a jet, requires enormous leaps of faith. In contrast, robotically flying the jetliners into their targets could have been accomplished using the flight control computers that were standard equipment on the targeted planes.   All modern jetliners have sophisticated flight control computers, which allow the planes to be flown with at least the precision of a skilled human pilot. The 757s and 767s used in the 9/11/01 attack were developed in the 1970s and employ similar avionics. Both contain integrated flight management computer systems (FMCS) which provide automatic guadance and control of the aircrat "from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing." [SIZE=-1]  <a href="http://www.911review.com/means/remotecontrol.html#ref1" target="_blank">1</a>  [/SIZE] </blockquote>

Verification: Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?

Top Bottom