Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Thursday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Jun 23, 2026
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Jun 21, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
7.6 Billion Loss - CEB
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hyaenidae" data-source="post: 31249290" data-attributes="member: 530392"><p>Eh not really. He is referring to a situation where the initial bidder informed the govt that they could not export coal to Sri Lanka (sanctions?) soon after the tender process so the next in line secured the contract.</p><p></p><p>This time the supplier is in the process of shipping coal well after the tender's completion so the govt has to either</p><p></p><p>1. Stick with the current supplier and get enough coal to keep the plant running until a fresh tender process can be completed</p><p>2. Obtain emergency supplies without a tender process which could end up being more expensive than sticking with the current supplier</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hyaenidae, post: 31249290, member: 530392"] Eh not really. He is referring to a situation where the initial bidder informed the govt that they could not export coal to Sri Lanka (sanctions?) soon after the tender process so the next in line secured the contract. This time the supplier is in the process of shipping coal well after the tender's completion so the govt has to either 1. Stick with the current supplier and get enough coal to keep the plant running until a fresh tender process can be completed 2. Obtain emergency supplies without a tender process which could end up being more expensive than sticking with the current supplier [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom