Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
කිතුල් තලප
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Yesterday at 7:04 PM
Ad icon
ව්යාපාර, Tuition පන්ති සහ Personal Portfolios සඳහා Web Setup එකක් රු. 9,099/- කට (වාර්ෂික renewal ර
thathsilura
Updated:
Thursday at 6:17 PM
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Aug 19, 2026
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Aug 18, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
7.6 Billion Loss - CEB
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hyaenidae" data-source="post: 31249290" data-attributes="member: 530392"><p>Eh not really. He is referring to a situation where the initial bidder informed the govt that they could not export coal to Sri Lanka (sanctions?) soon after the tender process so the next in line secured the contract.</p><p></p><p>This time the supplier is in the process of shipping coal well after the tender's completion so the govt has to either</p><p></p><p>1. Stick with the current supplier and get enough coal to keep the plant running until a fresh tender process can be completed</p><p>2. Obtain emergency supplies without a tender process which could end up being more expensive than sticking with the current supplier</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hyaenidae, post: 31249290, member: 530392"] Eh not really. He is referring to a situation where the initial bidder informed the govt that they could not export coal to Sri Lanka (sanctions?) soon after the tender process so the next in line secured the contract. This time the supplier is in the process of shipping coal well after the tender's completion so the govt has to either 1. Stick with the current supplier and get enough coal to keep the plant running until a fresh tender process can be completed 2. Obtain emergency supplies without a tender process which could end up being more expensive than sticking with the current supplier [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom