Airtel Court case dismissed

lkdood

Member
Apr 7, 2008
56,856
1,798
0
Washington, D.C. / London, U.K.
The Supreme Court today refused to grant leave to proceed with the fundamental rights petitions filed by Bharati Airtel Lanka (Pvt) Ltd as well as two consumers challenging the floor price imposed on tariffs implemented by mobile operators.

The Telecommunications Regulatory Commissions (TRC) has now revised current floor price as follows: Off Net – Rs 2 and On Net – Rs 1 per minute basis Tariff Plans; Off Net – Rs 2.50 and On Net – Rs 1.25 per Second Basis Tariff Plans; and Off Net – Rs 0.25 and On Net – Rs 0.10 for SMS.


The TRC has directed the Airtel Lanka to refrain from offering tariff plans which are below the revised floor price rates to customers who have not subscribed to such tariff plans after July 1, 2010.


However, the TRC has allowed it to continue the tariff plans which have already offered to customers even below the floor rates until the TRC decides on the same.


Airtel said that when it entered the market as the 5th player with a substantial investment, there were dominant players in the market and that unless a new-comer offers a clear price advantage to subscribers in addition to a better customer service, any newcomer will not be able to attract the subscribers.


It contended a floor rate will only help a market leader and maintain the status quo (the existing state of affairs) at the expense of the customers and that at the time, it launched its service, there was no floor rate in telecom market.


It expressed dismay that it could not have anticipated the imposition of a floor price at the time it decided to enter the Sri Lankan market and invest such a large sum of money.


It complained the decision of the TRC is against the interest of the customers and is ultra vires the powers of the TRC and that the said decision prevents a level playing field and discriminates between sections of consumers and/or sections of operators.


Airtel Lanka is a subsidiary of Bharati Airtel Ltd of India which is the world’s 7th largest operator with more than 180 million subscribers operating across 18 countries.


Presently, it is engaged in expanding its territorial network coverage including the network to the North and Eastern Provinces.

Dailymirror
 

rishoban

Well-known member
  • Dec 30, 2008
    3,814
    54
    48
    Badulla
    Hmm..........So, now Airtel also have to change their current price plans, now they can compete with other operators in Broadband, the best thing they can do at the moment is increase their 3.5G HSPA signals across the country and increase their international bandwidth to provide a better broadband plans.

    other than that, in their mobile call tariff they can increase the Value added services and attract customers, For, Eg: their Youth Plans have attracted many youngsters not only because of cheap call rates, but also the free VAS included in the package.

    Currently, the best thing to do, as I said earlier, is to improve their HSPA and 3G coverage.
     

    iphone3g

    Member
    May 15, 2009
    1,263
    10
    0
    Hmm..........So, now Airtel also have to change their current price plans, now they can compete with other operators in Broadband, the best thing they can do at the moment is increase their 3.5G HSPA signals across the country and increase their international bandwidth to provide a better broadband plans.

    other than that, in their mobile call tariff they can increase the Value added services and attract customers, For, Eg: their Youth Plans have attracted many youngsters not only because of cheap call rates, but also the free VAS included in the package.

    Currently, the best thing to do, as I said earlier, is to improve their HSPA and 3G coverage.
    true true
     

    seaimsk

    Member
    Jul 31, 2010
    1
    0
    0
    A fundamental rights petition filed by Bharati Airtel Lanka challenging prices imposed on mobile operators was dismissed today by the Supreme COurt.

    The court refused to grant leave to proceed with the fundamental rights petitions filed by the company as well as two consumers challenging the floor price imposed on tariffs implemented by mobile operators.

    Airtel complained that the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission's decision to impose a new scheme was against the interest of the customers and is ultra vires the powers of the comission.



    straws semen straw