Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="¤--bACarDi--¤" data-source="post: 3879974" data-attributes="member: 160399">No dude,,,,, U didnt understand wot i said...<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /> This is abt Overclocking\Perfomance boost Test,,, not only which CPU goes to higher GHz. U knw world record is for INTEL PENTIUM CPU @ 8+GHz<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> So ppl can understand which CPU gives the best performance @ same Overclocking point....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/dull.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":dull:" title="Dull    :dull:" data-shortname=":dull:" /> Eg:- How many 3DMark gives Phenom II @ 6GHz       How many 3DMark gives Core i7 @ 6GHz        How many 3DMark gives Yorkfields @ 6GHzBut i dnt believe these kind of Synthetic benchmarks are useful to measure CPU performance.... cuz Some CPUs (Most INTEL) are the best CPUs in all Synthetic tests.... But @ high-End Gaming with full of Anti-Aliasing they gives damn Frame Rates, Jas like GTX295....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/growl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":growl:" title="Growl    :growl:" data-shortname=":growl:" /> I think AMDs(CPUs & GPUs) are more Stable than both Intel & nVIDIA @ work load...I think now u could realize that wot i said before <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom