Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ugmdjmali" data-source="post: 6276089" data-attributes="member: 20691">HE the President please come for a debate with Fonseka on war corruption during war operations : we hope you will not slink from itMedia spokesmen of Fonseka jointly requestMedia joint co ordinators, Mangala Samaraweera and Anura Kumara Dissanayake of Opposition common candidate Gen. Sarath Fonseka had addressed a letter to the President requesting for a debate between Gen. Fonseka and the President regarding the suspicious arms deals and corrupt transactions during the period of the war. The letter requests the President to select a suitable TV channel and a time for this debate . While giving due respect for the President’s limited time, both Mangala Samaraweera and Anura Kumara Dissanayake have always given top priority to political debates across the country. This request will give the President the opportunity to clear the air about these suspicious transactions in accordance with Wimala Weerawansa’s efforts to introduce traditions of promoting debates on dubious and suspicious deals.The letter to the President is as follows:His Excellency the President,Wimal Weerawansa MP, who is a frontline ally of your Excellency at a press briefing had made serious false allegations against Common Presidential candidate Gen. Fonseka in connection with an arms deal. He had alleged that a relative of the General was involved in an arms supply fraud. Moreover, he had challenged the General for a debate on this issue.Certainly there are doubts and suspicion surrounding the arms and weapons transactions. Clear information regarding these deals have not been revealed by the Govt. to the people. We thank Weerawansa for suggesting that debating customs and practices shall be followed so that the people will know the truth. We are confident that your Excellency will agree to such debates on the television channels.     During the period when Gen. Fonseka was the Army Commander, it was you who functioned as the Defense Minister.. Hence, during that period , you were fully responsible for all those transactions and they occurred with your consent. It is our belief therefore that the debate should be between Gen. Fonseka and you who was the Defense Minister at that time. A debate between persons who were not connected with this subject will create more misunderstandings and complications. Holding a debate with an individual who is betraying his ignorance by making bogus allegations and is ignorant of the arms deals, the quantity involved and the payments thereto is meaningless.While thanking Weerawansa for having made this proposal, it is our conviction that your Excellency will accept this challenge conducive to salutary political traditions . We will appreciate your participation in this debate..We are certain you will also take measures to hold a number of debates for the so many suspicious arms transactions as alleged by your close ally, Weerawansa.We request your Excellency to give us a time which suits you and the TV channel you propose to hold this debate. We truly value your Excellency’s efforts to give due place to political debates in the country.Here is the chance for MR to cum n prove their shitty censure.. if he reject this we can realize everything</blockquote>

Verification: Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?

Top Bottom