Aqua or Civic Hybrid ? (fuel efficiency, pickup, maintenance, etc) ??

ishan.fdo

Well-known member
  • May 1, 2012
    1,950
    721
    113
    Toyota Aqua Hybrid or Honda Civic FD3 Hybrid 2008?

    rm4v3s.jpg


    I think this is gonna be a bigger argument.

    Ubalage ideas kiyahalla methana..
    Mata me 2ken ganda hoda mokadda?

    The factors I consider are below in prioritized order.

    As per my knowledge, the prices are below, correct me if im wrong
    Aqua - 45laks
    Civic - Arround 35laks

    1. Fuel economy , budget

    2. Comfortable factor.

    3. Pickup and handling etc.

    4. Maintenance cost.
     
    Last edited:

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    52,641
    2
    54,218
    113
    You can get a 2013/2014 Aqua for 4.5 mil, whereas a 2009/2010 Civic Hybrid will cost the same so go for the aqua if you want a newer car. When buying a hybrid newer is always better.

    Never owned neither of them so no idea on maintenance costs.

    Comfort. performance would be more or less the same
     

    your_love

    Well-known member
  • Apr 7, 2012
    14,047
    1
    11,083
    113
    You can get a 2013/2014 Aqua for 4.5 mil, whereas a 2009/2010 Civic Hybrid will cost the same so go for the aqua if you want a newer car. When buying a hybrid newer is always better.

    Never owned neither of them so no idea on maintenance costs.

    Comfort. performance would be more or less the same

    i guess Civic is more comfort than aqua
     

    Kiri_Hoda

    Junior member
  • Dec 23, 2015
    146
    12
    18
    AQUA eka hodai bn fueluth karanawane hodata. Idath shapene Civic (Honda) eke 2nd hand market Aqua (Toyota) tharam nane.
     

    ramishka

    Active member
  • Feb 11, 2007
    441
    189
    43
    Driven AQUA briefly. 2011 FD3 is my daily drive for 3 years.

    1. Fuel Efficiency - Aqua by a long shot. If my friends are correct Aqua does 20-30kmpl even on city traffic while the max Civic hybrid would do is about 24kmpl on highway. It Colombo traffic it would do 10-15kmpl depending on the nature of traffic.

    2. Comfort - Civic. It also has the better looking interior.

    3. Pickup and Handling - Civic. The Aqua just felt boring for me. The Civic felt better to handle and snappier on the acceleration than the Axio Hybrid actually.

    4. Never maintained an Aqua so I can't tell for sure. As for the Civic there is nothing unusual to maintain as long as you service it properly and keep the car running. If you don't run the car often, don't get the Civic hybrid.
    And if you are getting a used one, get the IMA battery capacity check done by Stafford motors. Get something with capacity above 40% (max is 75%). If you get one with a dying hybrid battery (mostly caused by not running the car for weeks at a stretch or sitting at a car lot or a ship) it will cost you 2lakhs-5lakhs to replace it.
    If you buy a model before 2009, make sure the system software is up to date. Models before 2009 had a problem with the IMA software where it would overuse the electric motor, causing the hybrid batteries to die out quickly. Honda fixed this is in a software update available for all models, and came pre installed on post 2009 builds.
    If you buy a car with hybrid battery recently replaced, makes sure the car runs the software that matches the new battery. Most people replace the battery and don't update the software. If it's not up to date, get it updated at a service center.

    If possible, just test drive both cars and see for yourself. As usual I see on this thread advice from people who have not driven either one of these cars. Only you will know what you like for sure.
     
    Last edited:

    Tharakadj

    Well-known member
  • May 11, 2009
    3,902
    316
    83
    Aqua machan. hybrid ganna kota aluth ekak ganin. parana ewala eka eka fault thinawa. aqua eke G grade ekak balapan.
     

    ishan.fdo

    Well-known member
  • May 1, 2012
    1,950
    721
    113
    thanks machnsla.. As i learned from here... Civic 2009 or above is good.. others might have issues with battery + software.
     

    ishan.fdo

    Well-known member
  • May 1, 2012
    1,950
    721
    113
    Driven AQUA briefly. 2011 FD3 is my daily drive for 3 years.

    1. Fuel Efficiency - Aqua by a long shot. If my friends are correct Aqua does 20-30kmpl even on city traffic while the max Civic hybrid would do is about 24kmpl on highway. It Colombo traffic it would do 10-15kmpl depending on the nature of traffic.

    2. Comfort - Civic. It also has the better looking interior.

    3. Pickup and Handling - Civic. The Aqua just felt boring for me. The Civic felt better to handle and snappier on the acceleration than the Axio Hybrid actually.

    4. Never maintained an Aqua so I can't tell for sure. As for the Civic there is nothing unusual to maintain as long as you service it properly and keep the car running. If you don't run the car often, don't get the Civic hybrid.
    And if you are getting a used one, get the IMA battery capacity check done by Stafford motors. Get something with capacity above 40% (max is 75%). If you get one with a dying hybrid battery (mostly caused by not running the car for weeks at a stretch or sitting at a car lot or a ship) it will cost you 2lakhs-5lakhs to replace it.
    If you buy a model before 2009, make sure the system software is up to date. Models before 2009 had a problem with the IMA software where it would overuse the electric motor, causing the hybrid batteries to die out quickly. Honda fixed this is in a software update available for all models, and came pre installed on post 2009 builds.
    If you buy a car with hybrid battery recently replaced, makes sure the car runs the software that matches the new battery. Most people replace the battery and don't update the software. If it's not up to date, get it updated at a service center.

    If possible, just test drive both cars and see for yourself. As usual I see on this thread advice from people who have not driven either one of these cars. Only you will know what you like for sure.

    thnks for ur valuable piece of advice mchn.. ill contact you when I'm ready sooner to buy one
     

    ramishka

    Active member
  • Feb 11, 2007
    441
    189
    43
    thanks machnsla.. As i learned from here... Civic 2009 or above is good.. others might have issues with battery + software.

    Even if you go for 2009 above, check the capacity of the battery. If the previous owner had the car sitting for days without using it, the battery's capacity to hold a charge may get reduced. The car would still run of course, but the power will be less.
     

    ishan.fdo

    Well-known member
  • May 1, 2012
    1,950
    721
    113
    Even if you go for 2009 above, check the capacity of the battery. If the previous owner had the car sitting for days without using it, the battery's capacity to hold a charge may get reduced. The car would still run of course, but the power will be less.

    In that case... isn't it better going for an Aqua. because this will be my first ever vehicle. So I don't know much technical stuff.. and I'm not interested in facing issues at the first. Because that would make a bad impression on my mind about vehicles. Because I will have to do lot of dedications and hard work for buying this vehicle. What you say bro?
     

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    52,641
    2
    54,218
    113
    In that case... isn't it better going for an Aqua. because this will be my first ever vehicle. So I don't know much technical stuff.. and I'm not interested in facing issues at the first. Because that would make a bad impression on my mind about vehicles. Because I will have to do lot of dedications and hard work for buying this vehicle. What you say bro?

    AFAIK Ramiska had to replace the battery of his Civic hybrid once, correct me if I'm wrong

    How many km's will you cover within a month? {rough estimate?)
     

    ramishka

    Active member
  • Feb 11, 2007
    441
    189
    43
    AFAIK Ramiska had to replace the battery of his Civic hybrid once, correct me if I'm wrong

    How many km's will you cover within a month? {rough estimate?)

    This is correct. I had to replace the battery at 30000km (I bought the car at 23000km), however that was expected. The car had sat for more than 30 days stationary ( Car lot at Japan + Japanese auction + Shipping time + Clearing time) and my battery had a factory recall issue (which applied only to a segment of 2011 JDM models ) where they used a wrong additive in the H/V battery which caused it to lose the charging capacity rapidly. Battery replacement was covered under warranty and I haven't had issues with my new battery for 80000+km.

    In that case... isn't it better going for an Aqua. because this will be my first ever vehicle. So I don't know much technical stuff.. and I'm not interested in facing issues at the first. Because that would make a bad impression on my mind about vehicles. Because I will have to do lot of dedications and hard work for buying this vehicle. What you say bro?

    Yes it might be suitable for you in your case. However, if you can find a Civic which was recently fitted with a new Japanese hybrid battery, or if you can get a car with high existing battery capacity , it won't give issues for 4-5 years. I have not had a major problem with the car for 100000km after that. I run 2000+km a month, including Kadugannawa climb 4 times a month.

    Why I asked you to drive both vehicles first was because that's what helped me decide. I knew about these battery issues before I bought it. I test drove both an Aqua and then the Civic in the same car sale and the moment I sat in the Civic i made my decision that was it.

    But in your case, if you don't want to mess with the technicalities and don't mind the looks and handling of an Aqua, it will be the way to go. As I said earlier it does have maybe 1.5 times better fuel efficiency than the Civic. And I haven't heard of Aquas having hybrid battery issues (correct me if I am wrong) and Toyota hybrid tech is solid.
     
    Last edited: