I think they are not all terrorists. But.. there are enough of them with twisted views in seats of power to be a cause for concern. Its all vey well the average muslim saying they dont support terrorism when their leaders, behind closed doors, do, becuase it satisfies their twisted views on how the world should be, which is controlled by the muslim faith and sharia law.
Muslim [leaders] in the UK want sharia law incorporated here becuase they feel that the UK legal system does not apply to them and their faith, and I feel that you have no business living in a country where you feel the laws do not apply to you. They have their own parliment here, which answers directly to governmet like some sort of sub-government concerned only with the muslim community and whose voice bypasses the general rule of democratic process. The have successfully lobbied local and national government to limit social and religious practices in public and in schools becuase it is deemed offensive to their failth, while using the very same argument to have their own way in exactly the same curcumstances.
One example was a complaint by muslim representitives over students wearing religious symbols in school, e.g., a crucafix, which they said was offensive to muslims, so the local council made it a rule that religious symbols could not be worn to schools (under the guise of banning all students from wearing 'jewelry'). Yet it is acceptable to allow a muslim student not to wear a school uniform, but a hijab. And one student even sued their local council over being told that she could not wear bangles to school only for her to argue that is was part of her religion. Sure enough, rather than annoy the muslim community, the court found in her favour. The problem is that once you start to speak out against the favouritism that seems so often found for muslims, you are a racist, when really you find it simply two faced and unacceptable.
Muslim [leaders] in the UK want sharia law incorporated here becuase they feel that the UK legal system does not apply to them and their faith, and I feel that you have no business living in a country where you feel the laws do not apply to you. They have their own parliment here, which answers directly to governmet like some sort of sub-government concerned only with the muslim community and whose voice bypasses the general rule of democratic process. The have successfully lobbied local and national government to limit social and religious practices in public and in schools becuase it is deemed offensive to their failth, while using the very same argument to have their own way in exactly the same curcumstances.
One example was a complaint by muslim representitives over students wearing religious symbols in school, e.g., a crucafix, which they said was offensive to muslims, so the local council made it a rule that religious symbols could not be worn to schools (under the guise of banning all students from wearing 'jewelry'). Yet it is acceptable to allow a muslim student not to wear a school uniform, but a hijab. And one student even sued their local council over being told that she could not wear bangles to school only for her to argue that is was part of her religion. Sure enough, rather than annoy the muslim community, the court found in her favour. The problem is that once you start to speak out against the favouritism that seems so often found for muslims, you are a racist, when really you find it simply two faced and unacceptable.
, even if a small proportion of bias gets into their reporting, the whole story is turned upside down. The need of the hour is an unbiased media, which is not influenced by the corridors of power or money!
