Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Google Pixel 9 Pro
vgp
Updated:
Thursday at 5:57 PM
Ad icon
Jobreceive.com for sale
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Tuesday at 8:55 PM
Post Your Vehicle for Sale — FREE! - https://libro.lk
Kalu_Puth
Updated:
Tuesday at 7:38 PM
ඔයාගෙ Assignment හෝ Thesis එක හරියට හදාගමු
ErMurazor
Updated:
Sep 26, 2026
Ad icon
BlackWall V2ray servers
hu KANNA
Updated:
Sep 23, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
ElaKiri.com
News and Updates
Arecibo Telescope to closedown - An end of an era for Radio-Astronomy
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 25924507" data-attributes="member: 562115"><p>NASA is not a major stakeholder of the Arecibo Radiotelescope. It was a NSF initiative and it's responsibility. As the above article states, NASA does have it's Goldstone Observatory. A new Klystron has ben installed and this is currently operational. The dish is much smaller than Arecibo at 70m. There are similar ones in some other countries who are in the NASA DSN (Deep Space Network) tracking satellites etc - eg Australia.</p><p>The Goldstone radar has a higher resolution but Arecibo’s more powerful radar has a greater range, allowing it to observe more distant objects. That's why the scientific community isn't happy.</p><p>Hopefully, given time they will organise funding. The current technology is not one large monolithic dish, but an array of smaller dishes - hence much easier to install and maintain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="imhotep, post: 25924507, member: 562115"] NASA is not a major stakeholder of the Arecibo Radiotelescope. It was a NSF initiative and it's responsibility. As the above article states, NASA does have it's Goldstone Observatory. A new Klystron has ben installed and this is currently operational. The dish is much smaller than Arecibo at 70m. There are similar ones in some other countries who are in the NASA DSN (Deep Space Network) tracking satellites etc - eg Australia. The Goldstone radar has a higher resolution but Arecibo’s more powerful radar has a greater range, allowing it to observe more distant objects. That's why the scientific community isn't happy. Hopefully, given time they will organise funding. The current technology is not one large monolithic dish, but an array of smaller dishes - hence much easier to install and maintain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom