Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="harsh198924" data-source="post: 2909821" data-attributes="member: 120210">THIS IS WHAT WIKIPEDIA SAYS .................Environmental Protection Agency considers 1,4-dioxane to be a probable human <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogen" target="_blank">carcinogen</a> (having observed an increased incidence of cancer in controlled animal studies, but not in epidemiological studies of workers using the compound), and a known irritant (with a no-observed-adverse-effects level of 400 milligrams per cubic meter).<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_laureth_sulfate#cite_note-U.S.EPA_Dioxane-7" target="_blank">[8]</a> While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration encourages manufacturers to remove this contaminant, it is not currently required by federal law.Department of Dermatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen.Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, blood flow and skin colour were examined before and after exposure of 28 patients with atopic dermatitis and 28 healthy controls to sodium lauryl sulphate. Transepidermal water loss was measured with an evaporimeter, skin thickness by ultrasound A-scanning, blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry and skin colour by a chroma meter using the L*, a* and b* values, respectively. Patients with atopic dermatitis were found to have higher basal transepidermal water loss than controls (p less than 0.0001), and had an inclination towards an increased basal skin thickness (p = 0.056). No statistically significant differences were found with respect to basal blood flow or skin colour. The skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate was found to be statistically significantly increased in atopic patients compared with controls when evaluated by visual scoring and by increase in skin thickness, but not by increase in transepidermal water loss, blood flow or skin colourNO NEED TO WORRY ....................THE DOCTORS SAY THESE...................ANYWAYS..............IF U WANT TO USE.........YOU CAN USE...............ONLY DUBAI HAS BANNED IT.......................<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />AND IM NOT GONNA BAN IT IN SRI LANKA!!!!!!</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom