එහෙම නැතුව කරන්න බෑනෙ, අනිවා go around ගහල එන්න ඇත්තෙ...land කරනකොටම වගේ වම් පැත්තේ lane එකෙන් Emergency team සෙට් එකක් එනවා නේද? Sure එකටම landing gear එක වැඩ කරන්නේ නෑ කියලා ATC එකට කලින් කිව්වා ඇති.
Latest ads
-
RHCSA, RHCE, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes Training- Sanjeewani95
- Updated:
-
🛡️ Kaspersky Antivirus – 1 Year / 1 Device | Rs. 2,300 | Only 9 Left- KSPathirana
- Updated:
-
Professional CCTV Installation Service
- Techguy231
- Updated:
-
I'll research & write an article - Rs. 2000 onwards
- Blogerwiki
- Updated:
-
House Plan- lenura
- Updated:
Boeing-767 cargo ගුවන් යානය ඉදිරිපස රෝද නොමැතිව ගොඩ බස්වයි..පයිලට් ජනේලයෙන් ඵළියට ඵයි..⛔🛬
- Thread starter Truth Hurts
- Start date
එක තමයි. උන් issue එකක් තියෙනවා කියල දැන් ගත්තට පස්සේ risk එක analyse කරලනේ වැඩේ ගොඩ දාගත්තේ. කොහොමද ඔකේ indicators ටික ඔක්කොම perfectly තිබිලා land කරනකොටම ඔය වගේ case එකක් උනා නම්. ඒ වගේ වෙලාවක Pilotගේ මානසිකත්වය ගැන පොඩ්ඩක් හිතපන්. හම්මෝ .
දැන් නම් Simulators වල ඔය වගේ scenarios practice කරනව ඇති.
මේවා cargo plane, යන්නේ pilots and couple of staff only. එච්චර safety බලන්නෙ නෑ passenger plane වගේ. Passenger plane දුවලා condemn වුණාම තමයි cargo plane කරන්නේ.
This happens to Airbus aircraft too. But for some reason, whenever a Boeing plane has a problem, it gains much more media attention than Airbus aircraft. Most likely because media loves to bash Americans.
Examples:
Few months ago, there was media attention about a door falling off a Boeing 737 but around a month earlier, a window fell off an Airbus A320 and there was almost nothing on the media.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-engla...plane had to,members noticed damage and noise.
Last year, there was media attention about a water leak in an Air India Boeing 787 but before that, an Emirates A380 had a very similar problem. No media attention for that one.
https://mentourpilot.com/incident-w...t the problem,the floors and moving equipment.
Airbus A320 emergency landing due to hydraulics failure:
https://aviationsourcenews.com/emer...makes-emergency-landing-in-novosibirsk-field/
Airbus A320 engine fire:
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...t-after-engine-catches-fire-one-runway-closed
Airbus A320 emergency landing due to smoke:
https://www.portugalresident.com/tap-airbus-plane-in-emergency-landing-in-paris/
Boeing unge design issues ne bung MCAS.. ahala nadda? Airbus wala ehema issues awe nane.. anika NTSB un Boeing assembly line eke quality eka gana investigation ekak yanawa.. Boeing is a lost cause.. 777-9 series eka delay thama eliyata daganna baa..
එහෙම එන්නෙ ඔය වගේ crash landing එකක් උණාම කොක්පිට් එකට අවුල් වෙනවද දන්නෙ නෑ?පයිලට් ජනේලයෙන් ඵළියට ඵයි..
Boeing's downfall started after merge with DC.
You will be surprised how bad was DC in terms of quality wise. Many aircraft tragedies involves (directly or indirectly) some kind of a DC aircraft or some of the fallen part from a DC aircraft.
You will be surprised how bad was DC in terms of quality wise. Many aircraft tragedies involves (directly or indirectly) some kind of a DC aircraft or some of the fallen part from a DC aircraft.
ගෝතබල්ලා පල්ලි වලට බෝම්බ ගස්සලා කරපු තරං පාඩුවක් නෑලු
I'm not saying no machan.
You are right - 777X got delayed due to issues. But A380 (at the time called A3XX) got delayed by 10 years due to electrical issues. A number of initial A380s had Rolls Royce engine failure that caused emergency landings.
Right now, A321 neo is getting delayed because Pratt and Whitney engine contamination problem. This can also affect operational planes. But people are more worried about 737 Max.
All I'm saying is both manufacturers have their own problems but Boeing gets highlighted more.
lol what? Both?? i really don't think so.. A321 Engine issues has nothing to do with Airbus it's the Engine manufacturer. But Boeing is in real trouble that's a fact.. in what way you trying to highlight.. Boeing has lost it's relevance.. period! Boeing Golden days are over (737 Classic, 747 400 series, 777) Seems like your a Hardcore Boeing fanboy
Last edited:
