Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Yesterday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
🔒 NordVPN Premium – 3 Months
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:29 PM
🚀 Microsoft Office 365 Pro Plus – Lifetime Access! 🚀
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:28 PM
Linkedin Premium Business / Careere /Sales Navigator - 1/2/3/6/9/12 Months - Reddem Link
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:27 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
ElaKiri.com
News and Updates
BREAKING: Iran threatens to attack White House
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ramishka" data-source="post: 25070303" data-attributes="member: 18888"><p>Dude, here is how an argument works:</p><p></p><p>A posts something.</p><p>B disputes it.</p><p>It's A's responsibility to come up with a counter to B's dispute with FACTS.</p><p></p><p>That's what I've been doing in these threads. You post misleading bullshit on these threads and I disputed your claims. It's not my problem you got butthurt over that.</p><p></p><p>You are saying I'm not backing my claims with facts. Any dumbfuck who knows how to use Google can find out if what I'm saying is true or not. But since you seem to lack that ability, I will demonstrate by taking my last reply to you as an example. Here is what I replied to you with:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here are some references to back my claims in this post:</p><p></p><p>Basic overview of a ballistic missile: <a href="https://fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/basics.htm" target="_blank">https://fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/basics.htm</a></p><p>What United States Strategic Command is and their role in detecting nuclear launches: </p><p><a href="https://www.stratcom.mil" target="_blank">https://www.stratcom.mil</a> and</p><p><a href="https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/JFCC%20IMD%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/JFCC IMD Fact Sheet.pdf</a></p><p>Flight phases of a ballistic missile : <a href="http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/APDC/media/PDF-Files/Pathfinder/PF305-Three-Stages-of-the-Inter-Continental-Ballistic-Missile-Flight.pdf" target="_blank">http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/APDC/media/PDF-Files/Pathfinder/PF305-Three-Stages-of-the-Inter-Continental-Ballistic-Missile-Flight.pdf</a> (proof that an ICMB can take up to 30 mins to hit the target)</p><p>ICBM guidance and control mechanisms: <a href="https://fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/fun/part15.htm" target="_blank">https://fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/fun/part15.htm</a> . For a single missile to successfully hit an aircraft carrier, it will need course correcting in the terminal phase. This link will bear proof for my claim "Currently no country in the world posses such technology to do this with ICBMs."</p><p>CEP, ICBM target accuracy and desired ground zero: <a href="https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/documents/ICBMsNuclearForces.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/documents/ICBMsNuclearForces.pdf</a> (backs my claims of why it's not feasible to use a single ICBM on a moving target such as a carrier)</p><p></p><p>All of the above links are from reputed research organizations, universities or government. NOT Wikipedia, Quora, personal opinion or pulled out of my ass.</p><p>I could back all of my past replies to you with such documentation, but I won't bother. </p><p>Why? Because you do not have the backbone to admit you were wrong and will post some senseless bullshit void of facts to pretend you were right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ramishka, post: 25070303, member: 18888"] Dude, here is how an argument works: A posts something. B disputes it. It's A's responsibility to come up with a counter to B's dispute with FACTS. That's what I've been doing in these threads. You post misleading bullshit on these threads and I disputed your claims. It's not my problem you got butthurt over that. You are saying I'm not backing my claims with facts. Any dumbfuck who knows how to use Google can find out if what I'm saying is true or not. But since you seem to lack that ability, I will demonstrate by taking my last reply to you as an example. Here is what I replied to you with: Here are some references to back my claims in this post: Basic overview of a ballistic missile: [url]https://fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/basics.htm[/url] What United States Strategic Command is and their role in detecting nuclear launches: [url]https://www.stratcom.mil[/url] and [url]https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/JFCC%20IMD%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf[/url] Flight phases of a ballistic missile : [url]http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/APDC/media/PDF-Files/Pathfinder/PF305-Three-Stages-of-the-Inter-Continental-Ballistic-Missile-Flight.pdf[/url] (proof that an ICMB can take up to 30 mins to hit the target) ICBM guidance and control mechanisms: [url]https://fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/fun/part15.htm[/url] . For a single missile to successfully hit an aircraft carrier, it will need course correcting in the terminal phase. This link will bear proof for my claim "Currently no country in the world posses such technology to do this with ICBMs." CEP, ICBM target accuracy and desired ground zero: [url]https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/documents/ICBMsNuclearForces.pdf[/url] (backs my claims of why it's not feasible to use a single ICBM on a moving target such as a carrier) All of the above links are from reputed research organizations, universities or government. NOT Wikipedia, Quora, personal opinion or pulled out of my ass. I could back all of my past replies to you with such documentation, but I won't bother. Why? Because you do not have the backbone to admit you were wrong and will post some senseless bullshit void of facts to pretend you were right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom