Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Saturday at 10:32 PM
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Saturday at 3:55 PM
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Jun 11, 2026
Ad icon
Wechat qr verification
Pawan2005
Updated:
Jun 11, 2026
🚀 GOOGLE AI PRO 18 MONTHS ACTIVATION 🚀
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Jun 10, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Buddha: Atheist ?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sudunone" data-source="post: 5895757" data-attributes="member: 205934"><p>Mmmmm. Y2K, That article is too long. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/baffled.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":baffled:" title="Baffled :baffled:" data-shortname=":baffled:" /> </p><p>And this is not a source because this has been translated by a westerner without understanding Buddhism a long time ago.</p><p></p><p>Let me correct a few things from the parts I read:</p><p></p><p>Buddha didn't say gods don't exist. What the Buddha rejected was the concept of an omnipotent creator God. In sinhala and pali the word used for heavenly beings is 'deva', and 'deviyan wahanse' is a word born out of that. Buddhism says heavenly beings or devas exist. And Brahma is not used in the sense it is used in hindu/vedic literature. Brahmas are another group of heavenly beings who are in an even better realm than the devas.</p><p></p><p>So, there are a lot of instances where devas and brahmas visited Buddha.</p><p></p><p>That part about Created and Uncreated realms, as well as Being one with God/Brahman is also incorrect. "Creationism" is rejected. What Buddha taught was paticca samuppada/ dependent origination. The attainment of nibbana is a state where one is not reincarnated-it's not a place.</p><p></p><p>Anathma concept will also be easier to understand once you have studied paticcasamuppada. There is no permanent soul that gets reborn. And we change from moment to moment. </p><p></p><p>You cannot learn or understand all those things in one thread, or describe everything in one one thread. If you are keen to learn, find a good scholar who is a practicing Buddhist, or books/articles by those who have understood these concepts to a considerable degree. ask Kalyanamithra-he will give you several good sites. Or try dhamma talks and articles by ven. ajahn Sumedho, ajahn Brahmawanso etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sudunone, post: 5895757, member: 205934"] Mmmmm. Y2K, That article is too long. :baffled: And this is not a source because this has been translated by a westerner without understanding Buddhism a long time ago. Let me correct a few things from the parts I read: Buddha didn't say gods don't exist. What the Buddha rejected was the concept of an omnipotent creator God. In sinhala and pali the word used for heavenly beings is 'deva', and 'deviyan wahanse' is a word born out of that. Buddhism says heavenly beings or devas exist. And Brahma is not used in the sense it is used in hindu/vedic literature. Brahmas are another group of heavenly beings who are in an even better realm than the devas. So, there are a lot of instances where devas and brahmas visited Buddha. That part about Created and Uncreated realms, as well as Being one with God/Brahman is also incorrect. "Creationism" is rejected. What Buddha taught was paticca samuppada/ dependent origination. The attainment of nibbana is a state where one is not reincarnated-it's not a place. Anathma concept will also be easier to understand once you have studied paticcasamuppada. There is no permanent soul that gets reborn. And we change from moment to moment. You cannot learn or understand all those things in one thread, or describe everything in one one thread. If you are keen to learn, find a good scholar who is a practicing Buddhist, or books/articles by those who have understood these concepts to a considerable degree. ask Kalyanamithra-he will give you several good sites. Or try dhamma talks and articles by ven. ajahn Sumedho, ajahn Brahmawanso etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom