Buddhism quection

RealityOfX

Well-known member
  • Feb 5, 2021
    8,487
    1
    14,560
    113
    2) tama prashne.middle path nan.asimitha karunawak tiyenne kohomada.etakota eka side ekakata extreme wagene
    Extreme na. niganta thamai a petten extreme. swabhawadharmaye neethi walata garu karanawa. payata sattu pegenawa kiyala nigantayo wage eka thena inne na. niyaama dharma kiyana eken karmaya ekak witharai. chethanawa mul karan wena dewal karmaya. chethananwitha nowiii anith niyaama dharmayangen wena dewal walakwanna extreme widiyata nigantayo wage hithanne na.
     

    Chethiya Wijayawardhana

    Well-known member
  • Feb 17, 2016
    2,238
    3,796
    113
    Mata tama terenne ne ban.budu una ekenekta compassion tiyenne kohomada.mamathwaya nethi karala nan:oo:
    You hit the nail on the Head.
    That is exactly the point of Buddhist Compassion.
    It arises from a non egoist point of view.
    මමත්වය කියන්නෙ අවිද්‍යාවක් බව දැන ගැනීම තුලින් හට ගන්න කරුණාවක්.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,099
    66,530
    113
    You hit the nail on the Head.
    That is the exact point of Buddhist Compassion.
    It arises from a non egoist point of view.
    මමත්වය කියන්නෙ අවිද්‍යාවක් බව දැන ගැනීම තුලින් හට ගන්න කරුණාවක්.
    :oo: then who develop karunawa after realizing?
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,099
    66,530
    113
    Did Buddha say losing mamathwaya means doubting your own existence?
    Ok so if 'I' is an illusion.Then who develop maitree?Is it the state of universe?

    the answer should be no one. :lol:
    because there is no self to begin with.
    but I know that does not make any linguistic sense.
    This is where i get stuck.hindus talk about this as infinite compassion.But does this got mixed up with buddhism?I doubt
    ------ Post added on Mar 5, 2021 at 10:56 PM
     

    akunad

    Well-known member
  • Jan 28, 2010
    1,382
    1,199
    113
    Non of your business
    O

    Othana issue ekak tiyenawa ban.middle path kiyanne oya dekema terumak nethiwa bawa danaganima neda.nethuwa body eka balance eke tibbata middle path wenne ne neda?

    mage answer eka ayith balanna
    "Middle path kiyala kiwwe darmaya awaboda karagenima sadaha sharirayata duk dima thulin darmaya awaboda wenneth ne, sharirayata sepa dima thulinuth darmaya awaboda karagannath be kiyana ekai"

    darmaya sepa dila or duka dila awaboda wenne ne. eka wenne loka sathya awaboda karagenimen.
    e kale india wala minissu shariyatata duk dila goda yanna puluwan kiyala hithala thiyanawa, saththu wage jiwath wela (e widiyata ewidala, kala) goda yanna balala thiyanawa. e system eken niwana awaboda karaganna be kiyalai kiyala thiyenne

    anith petten sarirayata uparima sepa dunnath lebena niwanak ne. eka therum ganna apahasu ne ne

    darmaya awaboda karaganna eke wenas deyak. eka angen wenne ne. manasen wena deyak kiyala kiwwe.

    hebei badaginne inne kenekta budun darya deshana karala ne. moko sariraya samanya level eke nethi welawata damaya thiya mokak wath therenne ne.
     

    Chethiya Wijayawardhana

    Well-known member
  • Feb 17, 2016
    2,238
    3,796
    113
    Ok so if 'I' is an illusion.Then who develop maitree?Is it the state of universe?


    This is where i get stuck.hindus talk about this as infinite compassion.But does this got mixed up with buddhism?I doubt
    ------ Post added on Mar 5, 2021 at 10:56 PM
    buddha does not deal with any thing infinite.
    Hindus are master metaphysicians. Buddha was against all that
    His concern is with finite things.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,099
    66,530
    113
    My argument is this whole maitree thing is a hindu concept which got stuck in buddhism.what do you say :oo:
     

    Chethiya Wijayawardhana

    Well-known member
  • Feb 17, 2016
    2,238
    3,796
    113
    Can you explain how compassion exist if there is no self to begin with? :oo:
    Obviously as someone who still believe in the self, I could not give you an answer to your question.
    All I say is when we talk about these topics, we get stuck in ordinary language.
    According to language there must be a subject who feels things, that is how we talk about our day to day lives.
    But buddha say there is no Subject behind those feelings.
    There are just that, Feeling, Sensations, etc..
    Of Course We can't construct a meaningful sentence without a Subject.
    That is a defect of out Language.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,099
    66,530
    113
    Obviously as someone who still believe in the self, I could not give you an answer to your question.
    All I say is when we talk about these topics, we get stuck in ordinary language.
    According to language there must be a subject who feels things, that is how we talk about our day to day lives.
    But buddha say there is no Subject behind those feelings.
    There are just that, Feeling, Sensations, etc..
    Of Course We can't construct a meaningful sentence without a Subject.
    That is a defect of out Language.
    So is it possible to say compassion is the reality of existance? :oo:
     

    Chethiya Wijayawardhana

    Well-known member
  • Feb 17, 2016
    2,238
    3,796
    113
    Or did we get buddhism all wrong :baffled:
    No, that is a worthy question.
    may be one of the harder questions of Buddhism.
    Of course with Mahayana, you can see compassion plays a much larger part. (too much part)
    But there is a doctrine of Compassion in the Early Buddhism.