Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="twisted" data-source="post: 11899474" data-attributes="member: 82108">are you implying that courses sliit offers and the quality of them are crap? or is it that they pass out disqualified individuals into the system? I think we both agree that private institutes should maintain some sort of quality may be with the aid of some government organization. so this just invalids your argument. and if a student who previously failed one or more subject is welcome in such a uni and is continuing passing the given exams and such, is he not qualified enough? and why would you confuse the above with government institutes? if the quality of government schools is dropped because of the emerge of private schools, who's fault is that? it is entirely up to government keep up as they go. and if they don't, it is up to you guys and your whatever unions that you see to it that the government in fact does it. what I'm saying is two things can very well co exist. even if the attractive offers of the courses of private uni's draws people, that should not be a reason for the government to let their quality fade.. assuming the government, as it rightfully should, will retain the quality of their institute, poor students can benefit from them, while those who need private schools go for that. you should know that it's not personal then <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom