Cancer Hospital Help!

crazycombo

Member
Jul 4, 2008
3,101
13
0
A Land Like No Other!
Guys,

I need to get some information abt bone cancer. this is regarding my final year computing project and this is crucial since i need some CT scan reports to manipulate with the system.

is there anybody who have some contacts in National cancer hospital, maharagama that i can reach and get some info.

thanks in advance.
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
crazycombo said:
Guys,

I need to get some information abt bone cancer. this is regarding my final year computing project and this is crucial since i need some CT scan reports to manipulate with the system.

is there anybody who have some contacts in National cancer hospital, maharagama that i can reach and get some info.

thanks in advance.
mama dennam
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Musculoskeletal Oncology: Introduction
Tumors of the musculoskeletal system are an extremely heterogeneous group of neoplasms consisting of well over 200 benign types of neoplasms and approximately 90 malignant conditions. The relative incidence of benign to malignant disease is 200:1. The tumors uniformly arise from embryonic mesoderm and are categorized according to their differentiated or adult histology. Current classification schemes are essentially descriptive. Each histologic type of tumor expresses individual, distinct behaviors with great variation between tumor types. Benign disease, by definition, behaves in a nonaggressive fashion with little tendency to recur locally or to metastasize. Malignant tumors or sarcomas, such as osteosarcoma and synovial cell sarcoma, are capable of invasive, locally destructive growth with a tendency to recur and to metastasize.
Neoplastic processes arise in tissues of mesenchymal origin far less frequently than those of ectodermal and endodermal origin. In 2004, soft-tissue and bone sarcomas had an annual incidence in the United States of more than 8600 and 2400 new cases, respectively. When compared with the overall cancer mortality of 563,000 cases per year in 2004, sarcomas are a small fraction of the problem. However, although a relatively uncommon form of cancer, these mesenchymal tumors behave in an aggressive fashion with reported current mortality rates in some series greater than 50%. According to the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, approximately 8600 new soft-tissue sarcomas developed in the United States in 2004 with over 3600 sarcoma-related deaths. The associated morbidity is much higher. These tumors inflict a tremendous emotional and financial toll on individuals and society alike. Furthermore, sarcomas are more common in older patients, with 15% percent affecting patients younger than 15 years and 40% percent affecting persons older than 55 years. Accordingly, as the population ages, as it is doing at a rapid rate, the incidence of these tumors will increase.
Etiology of Musculoskeletal Tumors
Tumorigenesis is a complex multiple-step process by which healthy tissue progressively transforms from a normal phenotype into an abnormal colony of proliferating cells. During this process, cells acquire genetic abnormalities in oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and other genes that directly or indirectly control proliferation. Such a process may progress beyond the controlled state of benign disease to become a dedifferentiated, aggressive, and immortal phenotype by genomic instability. It is this instability that allows the cell to progress to fulminant malignancy. DNA regulation and, correspondingly, integrity is ultimately lost and a cancer is born.
To appreciate how bone or soft-tissue tumors develop, one must have a basic understanding of the cell cycle during which cell division occurs. The cell cycle is divided into four distinct phases: G1 (gap 1), S (DNA synthesis), G2 (gap 2), and M (mitosis). DNA synthesis occurs during the S phase, with chromosomal separation and cell division occurring in the M phase. The majority of cell growth takes place during G1. The mature state for mesenchymal tissues is normally in a resting, nonproliferative phase designated G0. It is the factors that affect the exit of the cell from G0, with entrance into G1, that is the hallmark of neoplastic disease.
Control of the cell cycle is a function of numerous regulatory proteins and checkpoints. The checkpoints allow for the monitoring and correction in the genetic sequence. The proteins are encoded by two basic gene types: oncogenes (stimulatory) and tumor suppressor genes (inhibitory). The retinoblastoma (Rb) protein and its phosphorylation state are critically important in regulating cell cycle progression (from G1 to S phase). Therefore, the activation state of Rb is a highly regulated cellular event. In addition, multiple cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases are being studied actively to elucidate their role in regulation of the cell cycle.
Oncogenes, encoding a variety of growth factors, promote progression of the cell through G1, effecting a mitogenic signal. Suppressor genes, such as wild-type TP53, act to arrest the cell cycle. Specifically, TP53 acts to stop the cell cycle at the G1/S border as a final attempt to abort proliferation. Other suppressor genes work earlier to keep reproduction at bay. A complex array of molecules can serve as either an induction or suppressor function. When this pathway is not orchestrated properly, a given cell obtains the potential for limited or even immortal proliferation. A normal cell progresses through a preneoplastic state on its way to becoming neoplastic via the accumulation of mutations. A critical step during tumor progression is the loss of suppressor gene function, which occurs by a variety of defects, including deletions, translocations, promoter silencing, loss of heterozygosity, point mutations, microsatellite changes, and telomeric associations. The degree to which the daughter cells dedifferentiate into a malignant phenotype is a function of the amount of genomic instability that arises with each subsequent mitosis. Mutation begets mutation as the checkpoints and regulatory machinery continually fail to repair the genetic code.
Factors that influence these mechanisms include both inheritable genetic conditions (eg, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, retinoblastoma) or environmental factors. It is well established that oncogenic viruses, radiation, and chemical carcinogens can affect these processes, ultimately compromising genomic stability.
The neoplastic process may arrest in the so-called benign state, with further genomic instability curtailed, or it can almost progress to a sarcomatous state. For example, if the cell type of origin is a lipocyte, then a lipoma or liposarcoma may develop. Furthermore, a liposarcoma can progress in its dedifferentiation such that its phenotype, as a high-grade lesion, minimally reflects its lipocytic origin. This possibility does not imply, however, that all benign lesions are necessarily at risk for malignant degeneration. It is not a surgical indication to remove a lipoma because of concern over developing a liposarcoma.
Although a plethora of molecular markers are being studied, understanding the details of genomic instability and subsequent tumor formation is lacking. The initiation of the neoplastic process and subsequent disease progression is a complex multistep process in gene expression and deregulation. There is no single pathway by which all neoplasms arise; instead, multiple genetic targets are altered in a variety of sequences with the common result of cellular proliferation that is tumorigenesis.
Evaluation & Staging of Tumors
History & Physical Examination
When evaluating a new patient with a possible tumor, the workup must commence with a thorough history and physical examination. Prior to ordering any diagnostic studies, particular questions must be answered, and the physical characteristics of the mass in question must be assessed. This procedure prevents unnecessary tests and better enables the physician to determine which tests will be most helpful in diagnosing the condition as well as facilitating therapeutic interventions if needed.
The clinical history is of paramount importance (Table 6–1). The age of the patient permits the generation of a list of potential diagnoses (Table 6–2), which, when combined with the history and a few additional studies, should permit establishing a diagnosis. The duration of symptoms, rate of growth, the presence of pain, and a history of trauma can help elucidate the diagnosis. A careful past medical history, family history, and review of systems must not be overlooked
 
Last edited:

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Imaging Studies
Radiography
Initial evaluation should begin with plain radiography. In every patient with a suspected tumor, orthogonal anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the affected area should be taken. This includes soft-tissue masses as well. In many cases, radiographic examination is diagnostic, and no further imaging studies are indicated. However, in the case of a more aggressive process, the diagnosis may be determined on the plain radiographs but further evaluation with advanced studies is usually indicated to determine the extent of local soft-tissue involvement as well as to assess the extent of disseminated disease (staging).
The initial radiographic images must be scrutinized. For bone lesions, the location within the bone (eg, epiphyseal, metaphyseal, or diaphyseal) facilitates the diagnosis. Epiphyseal tumors are usually benign. The more malignant primary sarcomas, such as osteosarcoma, are typically seen in a metaphyseal location; however, round cell tumors, such as Ewing sarcoma, multiple myeloma, and lymphomas, are usually medullary diaphyseal lesions. A tumor arising from the surface of a long bone may be a benign lesion, such as an osteochondroma, or it may be a low-grade sarcoma, such as a parosteal osteosarcoma.
Terms such as geographic, well circumscribed, permeative, and are used to describe the appearance of radiographic abnormalities. Geographic or well circumscribed implies that the lesion has a distinct boundary and is sharply marginated, suggesting a benign tumor (Figure 6–1). A poorly defined, infiltrative process is described as permeative or moth eaten and reflects a more aggressive processsuch as a malignancy (Figure 6–2), although aggressive but benign processes can have this radiographic quality as well (Figure 6–3). An exception to this rule is multiple myeloma, which frequently demonstrates a punched-out, well-demarcated appearance but in multiple locations.
Figure 6–1.

loadBinaryCA08I3OX.jpg
Radiograph of an enchondroma of the second metacarpal. Notice its geographic appearance.
loadBinaryCAG17ARK.jpg
Radiograph of a proximal fibular osteosarcoma demonstrating the destructive, permeative nature of malignant bone tumors.
loadBinaryCA0H583A.jpg
Radiograph of a giant cell tumor of the thumb. This is a typical moth-eaten appearance.
With a careful history, physical, and appropriate radiographs, the physician can reach a working diagnosis of the lesion. Although benign and malignant tumors can mimic each other, some tumors can be ruled out on the basis of the history, the age of the patient, the location of the tumor (in which bone and where in the bone), and the radiographic appearance of the tumor, as shown in Tables 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, and 6-6. For example, a 20-year-old man with a 3-month history of pain in the knee is found to have an epiphyseal lesion in the distal femur. The lesion has a benign geographic appearance. If the tumor is benign, the criteria of the patient's age (see Table 6–2) eliminates only solitary bone cyst and osteofibrous dysplasia, but all other benign tumors remain possibilities. If the tumor is malignant, it is likely to be an osteosarcoma (various types), Ewing sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, vascular sarcoma, or, possibly, chondrosarcoma, according to the age criterion. The most common site for bone tumors is about the knee, especially the distal femur. The likely benign tumors are giant cell tumor, nonossifying fibroma, chondroma, osteochondroma, and chondroblastoma. The likely malignant tumors in this age group are osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and, possibly, chondrosarcoma. Most malignant tumors are metaphyseal. Based on location in the bone (Table 6–4), the most likely benign tumors are chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor. Most malignant tumors are metaphyseal. The geographic appearance implies a benign radiographic appearance. Thus, the working diagnosis would be chondroblastoma or, possibly, giant cell tumor if the lesion were benign, whereas it would be osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma if the lesion were malignant, which is less likely. In this age group, metastatic disease is very unlikely, but low-grade infection may mimic a tumor, particularly if the patient is immunocompromised, as can be determined from the patient's history. Table 6–5 indicates the most useful studies for further workup.
Table 6–4. Skeletal Distribution of Bone Tumors, Ranked from Most Common (1) to Less Common (5) Sites.
Type of Tumor Femur Tibia Foot or Ankle Humerus Radius Ulna Hand or Wrist Scapula Clavicle Rib Vertebra Sacrum Pelvis Skull Face
Imaging Characteristics Location in a Long Bone Beneficial Studies Type of Tumor Geographic Moth Eaten Permeative Epiphyseal Metaphyseal Metadiaphyseal Diaphyseal Surface Plain Radiograph CT Scan MRI Isotope Bone Scan Blood Studies Benign bone
MFH = malignant fibrous histiocytoma.
Isotope Bone Scanning
Technetium-99 radioisotope scans are used to assess the degree of osteoblastic activity of a given lesion (Figure 6–4). In general, they are quite sensitive, with a few exceptions, for active lesions of bone. Accordingly, technetium-99 scans are excellent screening tools for remote lesions (staging). The best indication for a bone scan is suspected multiple bony lesions, such as those commonly seen in metastatic carcinomas and lymphomas of bone. Isotope bone scanning is far simpler to perform, less expensive, and requires less total body irradiation than skeletal surveys. It is common practice to use serial isotope scans to follow patients with suspected metastatic disease and at the same time evaluate the effectiveness of their systemic therapy program.

loadBinaryCAB9Z600.gif
loadBinaryCAB9Z600.gif
 
Last edited:

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Isotope scanning is also used in the staging process of a primary sarcoma such as an osteosarcoma to make sure the patient does not have an asymptomatic remote skeletal lesion. Technetium-99 scans are also useful in distinguishing blastic lesions of bone. Given that the study reflects metabolic activity, an enostosis (bone island) would not demonstrate significant increased activity compared with a blastic prostate metastasis. Inflammatory disease and trauma also show increased activity. It is important to note, however, that multiple myeloma and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma may not demonstrate technetium uptake (ie, a false-negative result). Skeletal surveys are preferable for screening for additional sites of involvement in such cases.
Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Computed tomography (CT) remains a standard imaging procedure for use in well-selected clinical situations. Perhaps the best indication for CT is for smaller lesions that involve cortical structures of bone or spine (Figure 6–5). In such cases, CT is superior to MRI because the resolution of cortical bone using MRI is inferior. CT scan of the lung is the modality of choice for evaluating patients with sarcoma for possible lung metastases. Abdominal CT scan is invaluable in surveying for a primary tumor in patients who present with bone metastases. For tumors involving the pelvis and sacrum, CT can help elucidate the extent of bone involvement (Figure 6–6). In cases involving a soft-tissue lesion, MRI is far superior to CT unless there is a heavily calcified process
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
MRI is the imaging modality of choice for evaluating bone marrow involvement as well as noncalcific soft-tissue lesions. The two most commonly used MRI sequences are the T1-weighted and T2-weighted spin echo (Figure 6–7). MRI can also demonstrate the normal anatomy of soft structures, including nerves and vessels, thereby nearly eliminating the need for arteriography and myelograms. Dynamic-enhanced MRI, with its ability to estimate tumor blood flow by examining the rate of contrast uptake and clearance, may serve as a predictor of clinical outcome or tumor response to chemotherapy.:D
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Biopsy
The biopsy should usually be the final staging procedure. Although the biopsy can distort the imaging studies, such as MRI, pathologic evaluation and interpretation may require information provided by the prior workup. Complications relating to the biopsy are not infrequent. Accordingly, careful preoperative planning is imperative. The imaging studies aid the surgeon in selecting the best site for a tissue diagnosis. In most cases, the best diagnostic tissue is found at the periphery of the tumor, where it interfaces with normal tissue. For example, in the case of a malignant bone tumor, soft-tissue invasion is usually evident outside the bone, and this area can be sampled without violating cortical bone and thus without causing a fracture at the biopsy site. If a medullary specimen is needed, a small round or oval hole should be cut to decrease the chance of fracture. If the medullary specimen is malignant, the cortical hole should be plugged with bone wax or bone cement to reduce soft-tissue contamination following the procedure.
Obtaining an adequate specimen is critical. A frozen section determines if viable and adequate tissue were obtained. A few experienced tumor centers may make a definitive diagnosis based on a frozen section, allowing the surgeon to proceed with definitive operative treatment of the tumor. However, freezing artifact can cause overinterpretation of the material, so an aggressive resection should always be deferred until the permanent analysis is complete. Additional studies beyond conventional light microscopy, such as immunocytochemistries and cytogenetics, may also be necessary.
The placement of the biopsy site is a major consideration. If the surgeon is inexperienced and not familiar with surgical oncologic principles, a serious contamination of a vital structure such as the popliteal artery or sciatic nerve may occur. Such an error might necessitate an amputation instead of a limb-sparing procedure. To avoid this problem in the case of a suspected malignant condition, the surgeon who performs the biopsy should be the same surgeon who will perform the definitive operative procedure.
Transverse incisions should be avoided because removing the entire biopsy site with the widely resected subjacent tumor mass is difficult. Adequate hemostasis is mandatory to avoid formation of a contaminating hematoma. A drain may be helpful but frequently is unnecessary. If a drain is used, it must be placed in line with the incision.
Needle biopsies, either core or fine needle, can be used by experienced tumor centers, especially for lesions that are easily diagnosed, such as metastatic carcinomas or round cell tumors. Because the subtype of sarcoma is proving to be very important, architecture of the tumor is generally needed, which requires a core biopsy rather than a fine-needle aspirate. Core biopsies also allow the surgeon to sample various areas of the tumor to avoid sampling error in a heterogeneous tumor. In the case of a deep pelvic lesion or a spinal lesion, a CT-guided needle biopsy is ideal because it avoids excessive multicompartmental contamination.
In general, excisional biopsies are discouraged unless the lesion is particularly small (less than 2–3 cm) or in an area where a cuff of healthy uninvolved tissue of at least 1 cm can be removed as well. This technique ideally avoids a second procedure to remove the entire biopsy site if the lesion turns out to be malignant.
Cultures and Special Studies
The damage of biopsy specimens after retrieval can make it impossible to perform special studies such as immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, flow cytometry, and electron microscopy. For this reason, the biopsy surgeon should consult with the pathologist before specimens are retrieved and handled. Furthermore, many current studies require fresh tissue (no formalin). It is also a good habit to obtain cultures for bacterial culture (anaerobic and aerobic) as well as fungal and acid-fast bacteria if clinical suspicion warrants.
Molecular diagnostics is on the verge of revolutionizing sarcoma diagnostics. Specific translocations were found in a variety of tumors (Table 6–7). Furthermore, therapeutics are beginning to be designed against specific molecular defects in malignancies. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), a malignant mesenchymal tumor arising from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, omentum, and mesentery, overexpresses a mutant form of c-kit. The KIT gene encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor for the growth factor named stem cell factor or mast cell growth factor. Therapy directed against c-kit is having an early and remarkable effect on the previously difficult treatment of malignancy. Similar pathways are being elicited in other sarcomas
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
1.4 Tumors and masses

1.4.1 Bone Tumors

Initial study is plain X-ray of the area of interest.
Radiograph provides lesion location, matrix
mineralization, cortical involvement and
periosteal reaction.
CT is better for characterization of matrix
mineralization, cortical involvement and
periosteal reaction.
MRI gives improved anatomic details, define the
nature of the lesion and is sensitive & superior for
staging of bone tumors. It is useful to detect
invasion of muscle, neurovascular bundle,
adjacent fat planes, marrow, intracortical
extension, necrosis and hemorrhage. MR
spectroscopy has a potential to differentiate
benign from malignant lesion.
Bone scan is useful in patients with symptoms
related to bone or joint with normal X-ray. U/S
&CT guided biopsy can be done only after
discussion with referring surgeon.
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
Imaging of chronic pain, tumors, infections, and
osteoporosis is a broad subject and is due to various
etiologies. Pain may be due to bone, soft tissue and
articular pathologies or could be due to referred pain.
Few common disorders have been dealt here. Clinical
data is mandatory in selecting most appropriate imaging
technique. Establishment of the correct diagnosis is much
more than an academic exercise since it determines the
appropriate therapy. Multiple imaging modalities are
available for this purpose. Initial exam is almost always
X ray. This gives clue to the diagnosis. Further
information can be gained by doing additional
examinations. MRI is sensitive for detection of many
abnormalities involving the soft tissues and bones.
Availability and cost play a major role in selecting these
imaging methods.
 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴

1.2.1 Hip Joint

Initial exam is X ray pelvis AP to include both
hip joints/ Hip Joint LAT
Grade (X)
Symptoms may be due to numerous etiologies
including trauma, neoplasm & arthropathy.
Plain X ray helps to detect most common causes
like OA and also less common causes like
pigmented villonodularsynovitis (PVNS)

A. Osteoarthritis (OA)
It is best evaluated with X rays. When X ray
shows the changes of OA, no more study is
needed. OA hip is commonly bilateral and
involves superior joint space initially.

X ray findings are;
• Marginal sclerosis,
• Subchondral cysts
• Osteophytes
• Joint space narrowing.

B. In suspected osteochrondramatosis
The X ray - may show uniform size calcified or
ossified bodies in the joint.
MRI - provides greater details of the disease with
thickened synovium and nodules in the joint. It is
useful if diagnosis is doubtful. (Y)
Confirmation is done by synovial biopsy.

 

amila_90210

Member
Jul 5, 2008
17,444
436
0
෴පද පේළී෴
When X ray is nondiagnostic

i. But pain persists & then suspected bone/soft
tissue problem,
MRI is indicated as it is highly
sensitive for structures around hip and soft
tissue .After reviewing MRI, contrast can be
given. .If MRI is not available CT can be
done.

ii. But suspected Osteonecrosis (ON) –
X ray shows increased joint space; flatten
femoral head, fissures and sclerosis.
Grade (X)
MRI is the next examination of choice as it
has shown a high accuracy.
Grade (Y)

iii. But suspected osteoid osteoma –
X ray shows an area of sclerosis
CT is indicated because CT helps to identify
the nidus in the sclerotic bone