Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Thursday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Jun 23, 2026
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Jun 21, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Corona VIRUS - Daily Updates
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nikdw" data-source="post: 25351989" data-attributes="member: 558781"><p>Opinion: “We must speak the truth – the lockdown failed and we need fresh thinking”</p><p></p><p>Dr Ravi Rannan-Eliya, Executive Director,</p><p>Insitute for Health Policy</p><p></p><p>Given what we know about the new cases detected in the past two weeks, it was no longer justifiable to relax COVID control measures, including lifting the curfew in Colombo. This is a monumental and totally avoidable policy failure and an unmitigated fiasco.</p><p></p><p>If accountability meant anything in this country, there would have been consequences for those involved in setting the health response. And to be absolutely clear, I do not mean the President, who has so far only acted in good faith on the advice he has been given.</p><p></p><p>When the government imposed an island-wide curfew on the evening of March 20, we only had 72 cases. Until that point, almost all were people who had acquired the infection overseas and returned before we stopped all incoming flights on March 19. There were just a dozen other cases of local transmission, involving people in the community who had been infected directly or indirectly by a local arrival or foreign tourist.</p><p></p><p>The curfew should have had three clear objectives:</p><p></p><p>(1) To contain the virus to arrivals — This required screening all recent arrivals for infection and rapidly tracing and safely quarantining all cases and contacts of infected arrivals or any other cases to stop dead the spread of virus to others.</p><p></p><p>(2) To establish capacity and a system to rapidly detect, trace and isolate any cases of hidden infection in the community.</p><p></p><p>(3) To reduce social interaction so as to slow down person-to-person spread of any virus lurking in the population long enough for the first two objectives to be achieved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nikdw, post: 25351989, member: 558781"] Opinion: “We must speak the truth – the lockdown failed and we need fresh thinking” Dr Ravi Rannan-Eliya, Executive Director, Insitute for Health Policy Given what we know about the new cases detected in the past two weeks, it was no longer justifiable to relax COVID control measures, including lifting the curfew in Colombo. This is a monumental and totally avoidable policy failure and an unmitigated fiasco. If accountability meant anything in this country, there would have been consequences for those involved in setting the health response. And to be absolutely clear, I do not mean the President, who has so far only acted in good faith on the advice he has been given. When the government imposed an island-wide curfew on the evening of March 20, we only had 72 cases. Until that point, almost all were people who had acquired the infection overseas and returned before we stopped all incoming flights on March 19. There were just a dozen other cases of local transmission, involving people in the community who had been infected directly or indirectly by a local arrival or foreign tourist. The curfew should have had three clear objectives: (1) To contain the virus to arrivals — This required screening all recent arrivals for infection and rapidly tracing and safely quarantining all cases and contacts of infected arrivals or any other cases to stop dead the spread of virus to others. (2) To establish capacity and a system to rapidly detect, trace and isolate any cases of hidden infection in the community. (3) To reduce social interaction so as to slow down person-to-person spread of any virus lurking in the population long enough for the first two objectives to be achieved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom