MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary - by Chandana Madhura Kulathunga (lol) The facts: This dictionary is a gross violation of copy rights. Its dictionary database is completely & illegally copied from THIBUS. The real makers of this dictionary definitions would have spent years of time to complete it and this man has robbed it without any fear and put it in a crappy piece of software (which would involve few minutes of coding) and showing off as if he were the author. If this happened in a Western country this fellow would have been in jail. Not only this dictionary the following Sinhala English Dictionaries too use the very same database illegally copied from THIBUS: Chatura English Sinhala Dictionary - by Chatura Dilan Perera Vidudaya Popup Dictionary - A M R Ravimal Bandara If you just check these dictionaries you will notice that all of them have the very same definitions. Its unfortunate to see that these things continue to happen in Sri Lanka.
Latest ads
-
Colombo YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet- Romeshka
- Updated:
-
Colombo Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10- Sanjeewani95
- Updated:
-
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES- IVA Para Medical Campus
- Updated:
-
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family- anil1961
- Updated:
-
Video Content Creator
- pramukag
- Updated:
Download MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary
- Thread starter rapa
- Start date
MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary - Facts
MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary - by Chandana Madhura Kulathunga The facts: This dictionary is a gross violation of copy rights. Its dictionary database is completely & illegally copied from THIBUS. The real makers of this dictionary definitions would have spent years of time to complete it and this man has robbed it without any fear and put it in a crappy piece of software (which would involve few minutes of coding) and showing off as if he were the author. If this happened in a Western country this fellow would have been in jail. Not only this dictionary the following Sinhala English Dictionaries too use the very same database illegally copied from THIBUS: Chatura English Sinhala Dictionary - by Chatura Dilan Perera Vidudaya Popup Dictionary - A M R Ravimal Bandara If you just check these dictionaries you will notice that all of them have the very same definitions. Its unfortunate to see that these things continue to happen in Sri Lanka.
MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary - by Chandana Madhura Kulathunga The facts: This dictionary is a gross violation of copy rights. Its dictionary database is completely & illegally copied from THIBUS. The real makers of this dictionary definitions would have spent years of time to complete it and this man has robbed it without any fear and put it in a crappy piece of software (which would involve few minutes of coding) and showing off as if he were the author. If this happened in a Western country this fellow would have been in jail. Not only this dictionary the following Sinhala English Dictionaries too use the very same database illegally copied from THIBUS: Chatura English Sinhala Dictionary - by Chatura Dilan Perera Vidudaya Popup Dictionary - A M R Ravimal Bandara If you just check these dictionaries you will notice that all of them have the very same definitions. Its unfortunate to see that these things continue to happen in Sri Lanka.
The data of Chatura Sinhala English Dictionay is based on EnsiTip which is distribute under GNU/GPL license and the Sinhala English Dictionay itself is distribute under GNU/GPL. and it was design to overcome of the EnsiTip which cannot convert Sinhala words to English
This is the founder of GNU/GPL - Richard Stallman
According to GNU/GPL
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.
Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations.
Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.
This is the founder of GNU/GPL - Richard Stallman
According to GNU/GPL
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.
Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations.
Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.
Last edited:
madura may be took Definiton Database. But he offer Software Free. So No Need GNU Problem, MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary is great help people who working with english on the computer, Specially people who havent enough english knowledge. So MADHURA English-Sinhala Dictionary reduce fear to working people in - front of the computers with english. So don't hate Free sinhala Software that help much more to our community. Nation should mortivate people like MADURA and we must appriciate him
Who is the rogue? Madhura, Chatura or EnsiTip?
Well, all of the following dictionaries have the very same definitions (Dont say "great minds think alike"!!)
- Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary
- Madura Online Dictionary - (http://www.maduraonline.com)
- Chatura Sinhala English Dictionary
- Vidudaya English-Sinhala Dictionary
- SriLankeeya Online Sinhala English Dictionary (http://srilankeeya.com)
- EnSiTip - English-Sinhala-PopUp Dictionary (a Firefox add-on)
- Chatura Sinhala English Dictionary Firefox Toolbar
The fact is that this dictionary database was originally developed (& owned) by THIBUS software. And all the above sources have illegally copied the database from THIBUS including EnSiTip. Any one can rob someone else's property and republish under GNU/GPL. If this database is issued under GNU/GPL it is mandatory that it is publicly available for anyone to download. But this dictionary database is NOT publicly available and in fact property of THIBUS.
You seem to be the author of Chatura Dictionary, if so where did you get this dictionary database? And if you make it under GPL, have you made it available to the general public?
Well I remember a famous Sinhalese proverb "horungeth horu kamba horu"
Well, all of the following dictionaries have the very same definitions (Dont say "great minds think alike"!!)
- Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary
- Madura Online Dictionary - (http://www.maduraonline.com)
- Chatura Sinhala English Dictionary
- Vidudaya English-Sinhala Dictionary
- SriLankeeya Online Sinhala English Dictionary (http://srilankeeya.com)
- EnSiTip - English-Sinhala-PopUp Dictionary (a Firefox add-on)
- Chatura Sinhala English Dictionary Firefox Toolbar
The fact is that this dictionary database was originally developed (& owned) by THIBUS software. And all the above sources have illegally copied the database from THIBUS including EnSiTip. Any one can rob someone else's property and republish under GNU/GPL. If this database is issued under GNU/GPL it is mandatory that it is publicly available for anyone to download. But this dictionary database is NOT publicly available and in fact property of THIBUS.
You seem to be the author of Chatura Dictionary, if so where did you get this dictionary database? And if you make it under GPL, have you made it available to the general public?
Well I remember a famous Sinhalese proverb "horungeth horu kamba horu"
I have to tell that, I havent touch anything from Thibas software, even I dont have that software and even I dont know Thibas have that kind of database.
I told you that how I got data.
People are using Ensitp for more than two years now and its very popular among Sri Lankans.
So why you people make copyright claims for it after two years. There is somthing suspicious thing going on here against Sinhala English Dictionaries.
Ensitip creators never want to make it GNU/GPL if they have a illegal database because it is done by Language Research Center. Every people who use Sinhala unicode know about it. They distributed it under GNU/GPL respecting its laws.
I never believe that they get data from Thibas illegally.
So why do you people did for these two years... sleep? till all dictionaries become popular among people.
So what happen to Thibas, many people dont know that there is a dictionary called Thibas
However if something is proprietary the creator of that program should take necessary steps to protect their data, source form leaking to the public (such as encrypting the data) before distribute.
They notice that their data is leaked after two years.
How can we believe????????????
There is a conspiracy going now against Sinhala English Dictionary software, that's the truth
I told you that how I got data.
People are using Ensitp for more than two years now and its very popular among Sri Lankans.
So why you people make copyright claims for it after two years. There is somthing suspicious thing going on here against Sinhala English Dictionaries.
Ensitip creators never want to make it GNU/GPL if they have a illegal database because it is done by Language Research Center. Every people who use Sinhala unicode know about it. They distributed it under GNU/GPL respecting its laws.
I never believe that they get data from Thibas illegally.
So why do you people did for these two years... sleep? till all dictionaries become popular among people.
So what happen to Thibas, many people dont know that there is a dictionary called Thibas
However if something is proprietary the creator of that program should take necessary steps to protect their data, source form leaking to the public (such as encrypting the data) before distribute.
They notice that their data is leaked after two years.
How can we believe????????????
There is a conspiracy going now against Sinhala English Dictionary software, that's the truth
Hmm nice discussion going on copyrights. I dont know who has stolen and whose. But I have seen Thibus dictionary (this is not free) and also Madura dictionary (this is free! cool!) and these have similar (or the same) definitions. In my opinion if something is GPL then source must be available for any interested person(natalia2009 is right there). If you (chatura) say you got it from Language Research Center (i think you refer to colombo university school of computing) you should specifically disclose how he got it because no such dictionary is available for download in their site (http://www.ucsc.cmb.ac.lk/ltrl/?page=downloads&lang=en&style=default ). If you want to prove that you didnt illegally get it from EnSiTip why dont you specifically disclose whom you contacted to get this database? If this is under GPL anyone else too must be able to get it in the same way you got it!
Another thing that you say that it is developers responsibility to encrypt the database to avoid the possible leak. You are dead right but even if it is not so no one can legally copy it without permission of the copy right holder. Otherwise there is no need of law in the country!!
Another thing that you say that it is developers responsibility to encrypt the database to avoid the possible leak. You are dead right but even if it is not so no one can legally copy it without permission of the copy right holder. Otherwise there is no need of law in the country!!
There is no illegally copying from GNU/GPL licensed software, since they are giving the source with it. you'd better to read GNU/GPL license schema first.
The Ensitip you can download from LTRL site
http://www.ucsc.cmb.ac.lk/ltrl/projects/EnSiTip/
This extension is licensed under GNU General Public License v2.
How you people say Ensitip copying data illegally from Thibas. May be Thibas get data from Ensitip (LTRL) since it is distributed under GNU/GPL.
before make fake copyright claims for Ensitip and Chatura Sinhala English Dictionary please mention your identity
natalia, basker, cmb.lk, sampathkumara789. are you guys in the same gang or one person. are you the developers of Thibas or who are you?
Last edited:
Hello guys i found this link on a forum,all movies given below are available with mediafire links.
Just want to share.
IMDB TOP 100 Movies Download with Mediafire Links
1.9.1 The Shawshank Redemption (1994) 424,284
2. 9.1 The Godfather (1972) 351,846
3. 9.0 The Godfather: Part II (1974) 204,570
4. 8.9 Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo. (1966) 125,349
5. 8.9 Pulp Fiction (1994) 348,399
6. 8.9 Schindler's List (1993) 231,454
7. 8.9 The Dark Knight (2008) 368,034 or Alternate
8. 8.8 One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975) 177,578
9. 8.8 12 Angry Men (1957) 90,611
10. 8.8 Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980) 238,902
11. 8.8 Casablanca (1942) 145,144
12. 8.8 Star Wars (1977) 280,904
13. 8.8 Shichinin no samurai (1954) 82,607
14. 8.8 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) 306,520
15. 8.7 Goodfellas (1990) 191,341
16. 8.7 Rear Window (1954) 100,065
17. 8.7 Cidade de Deus (2002) 133,547
18. 8.7 Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) 212,320
19. 8.7 C'era una volta il West (1968) 59,409
20. 8.7 The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) 334,320
21. 8.7 Fight Club (1999) 315,883
22. 8.7 The Usual Suspects (1995) 229,936
23. 8.7 Psycho (1960) 120,836
24. 8.6 The Silence of the Lambs (1991) 207,537
25. 8.6 Sunset Blvd. (1950) 44,821
26. 8.6 Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) 136,037
27. 8.6 The Matrix (1999) 323,660
28. 8.6 Memento (2000) 227,492 Or Alternate Link
29. 8.6 North by Northwest (1959) 79,380
30. 8.6 It's a Wonderful Life (1946) 87,446
31. 8.6 Citizen Kane (1941) 121,754
32. 8.6 Se7en (1995) 231,040
33. 8.6 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) 279,558
34. 8.6 Léon (1994) 162,102
35. 8.6 Apocalypse Now (1979) 148,743
36. 8.5 American Beauty (1999) 251,742 or Alternate link
37. 8.5 Taxi Driver (1976) 129,176
38. 8.5 American History X (1998) 185,001
39. 8.5 Lawrence of Arabia (1962) 68,857
40. 8.5 Vertigo (1958) 77,586
41. 8.5 WALL•E (2008) 129,896 OR Alternate link
42. 8.5 Forrest Gump (1994) 247,444
43. 8.5 Paths of Glory (1957) 37,251
44. 8.5 Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain (2001) 150,422
45. 8.5 M (1931) 33,190
46. 8.5 Double Indemnity (1944) 30,631
47. 8.5 To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) 71,092
48. 8.5 Alien (1979) 151,238
49. 8.5 A Clockwork Orange (1971) 163,408
50. 8.5 The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) 27,623
51. 8.5 The Departed (2006) 213,985
52. 8.5 The Shining (1980) 146,970
53. 8.5 Das Leben der Anderen (2006) 55,486
54. 8.5 The Third Man (1949) 43,341
55. 8.4 Saving Private Ryan (1998) 230,549
56. 8.4 The Pianist (2002) 107,213 or Alternate Link
57. 8.4 Chinatown (1974) 65,981
58. 8.4 Slumdog Millionaire (2008) 120,497
59. 8.4 Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) 193,435
60. 8.4 Sen to Chihiro no kamikakushi (2001) 81,376
61. 8.4 Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) 182,255
62. 8.4 City Lights (1931) 21,911
63. 8.4 Aliens (1986) 143,424
64. 8.4 Requiem for a Dream (2000) 151,919
65. 8.4 L.A. Confidential (1997) 144,082
66. 8.4 Das Boot (1981) 60,887
67. 8.4 Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) 135,700
68. 8.4 The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) 50,522
69. 8.4 Reservoir Dogs (1992) 178,404
70. 8.4 El laberinto del fauno (2006) 123,275
71. 8.4 Raging Bull (1980) 75,823
72. 8.4 Rashômon (1950) 32,223
73. 8.4 The Maltese Falcon (1941) 44,236
72. 8.4 Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) 183,201
75. 8.4 All About Eve (1950) 30,011
76. 8.4 Modern Times (1936) 29,124
77. 8.4 Gran Torino (2008) 62,146
78. 8.4 Singin' in the Rain (1952) 47,106
79. 8.3 Rebecca (1940) 29,682
80. 8.3 Der Untergang (2004) 65,703
81. 8.3 Metropolis (1927) 32,573
82. 8.3 Some Like It Hot (1959) 57,022
83. 8.3 The Prestige (2006) 160,091
84. 8.3 Amadeus (1984) 82,639
85. 8.3 The Elephant Man (1980) 47,906 or Alternate Link
86. 8.3 The Apartment (1960) 29,959
87. 8.3 Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) 148,991
88. 8.3 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) 137,287
89. 8.3 Nuovo cinema Paradiso (1988) 37,347
90. 8.3 The Wrestler (2008) 54,773
91. 8.3 The Great Dictator (1940) 30,157
92. 8.3 Braveheart (1995) 206,549
93. 8.3 Det sjunde inseglet (1957) 30,130
94. 8.3 No Country for Old Men (2007) 160,138
95. 8.3 Sin City (2005) 214,657
96. 8.3 The Sting (1973) 55,806
97. 8.3 Ladri di biciclette (1948) 21,781
98. 8.3 Back to the Future (1985) 168,415 OR Alternate Link
99. 8.3 Touch of Evil (1958) 27,599
100. 8.3 Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) 28,323
DOWNLOAD LINK
Just want to share.
IMDB TOP 100 Movies Download with Mediafire Links
1.9.1 The Shawshank Redemption (1994) 424,284
2. 9.1 The Godfather (1972) 351,846
3. 9.0 The Godfather: Part II (1974) 204,570
4. 8.9 Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo. (1966) 125,349
5. 8.9 Pulp Fiction (1994) 348,399
6. 8.9 Schindler's List (1993) 231,454
7. 8.9 The Dark Knight (2008) 368,034 or Alternate
8. 8.8 One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975) 177,578
9. 8.8 12 Angry Men (1957) 90,611
10. 8.8 Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980) 238,902
11. 8.8 Casablanca (1942) 145,144
12. 8.8 Star Wars (1977) 280,904
13. 8.8 Shichinin no samurai (1954) 82,607
14. 8.8 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) 306,520
15. 8.7 Goodfellas (1990) 191,341
16. 8.7 Rear Window (1954) 100,065
17. 8.7 Cidade de Deus (2002) 133,547
18. 8.7 Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) 212,320
19. 8.7 C'era una volta il West (1968) 59,409
20. 8.7 The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) 334,320
21. 8.7 Fight Club (1999) 315,883
22. 8.7 The Usual Suspects (1995) 229,936
23. 8.7 Psycho (1960) 120,836
24. 8.6 The Silence of the Lambs (1991) 207,537
25. 8.6 Sunset Blvd. (1950) 44,821
26. 8.6 Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) 136,037
27. 8.6 The Matrix (1999) 323,660
28. 8.6 Memento (2000) 227,492 Or Alternate Link
29. 8.6 North by Northwest (1959) 79,380
30. 8.6 It's a Wonderful Life (1946) 87,446
31. 8.6 Citizen Kane (1941) 121,754
32. 8.6 Se7en (1995) 231,040
33. 8.6 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) 279,558
34. 8.6 Léon (1994) 162,102
35. 8.6 Apocalypse Now (1979) 148,743
36. 8.5 American Beauty (1999) 251,742 or Alternate link
37. 8.5 Taxi Driver (1976) 129,176
38. 8.5 American History X (1998) 185,001
39. 8.5 Lawrence of Arabia (1962) 68,857
40. 8.5 Vertigo (1958) 77,586
41. 8.5 WALL•E (2008) 129,896 OR Alternate link
42. 8.5 Forrest Gump (1994) 247,444
43. 8.5 Paths of Glory (1957) 37,251
44. 8.5 Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain (2001) 150,422
45. 8.5 M (1931) 33,190
46. 8.5 Double Indemnity (1944) 30,631
47. 8.5 To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) 71,092
48. 8.5 Alien (1979) 151,238
49. 8.5 A Clockwork Orange (1971) 163,408
50. 8.5 The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) 27,623
51. 8.5 The Departed (2006) 213,985
52. 8.5 The Shining (1980) 146,970
53. 8.5 Das Leben der Anderen (2006) 55,486
54. 8.5 The Third Man (1949) 43,341
55. 8.4 Saving Private Ryan (1998) 230,549
56. 8.4 The Pianist (2002) 107,213 or Alternate Link
57. 8.4 Chinatown (1974) 65,981
58. 8.4 Slumdog Millionaire (2008) 120,497
59. 8.4 Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) 193,435
60. 8.4 Sen to Chihiro no kamikakushi (2001) 81,376
61. 8.4 Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) 182,255
62. 8.4 City Lights (1931) 21,911
63. 8.4 Aliens (1986) 143,424
64. 8.4 Requiem for a Dream (2000) 151,919
65. 8.4 L.A. Confidential (1997) 144,082
66. 8.4 Das Boot (1981) 60,887
67. 8.4 Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) 135,700
68. 8.4 The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) 50,522
69. 8.4 Reservoir Dogs (1992) 178,404
70. 8.4 El laberinto del fauno (2006) 123,275
71. 8.4 Raging Bull (1980) 75,823
72. 8.4 Rashômon (1950) 32,223
73. 8.4 The Maltese Falcon (1941) 44,236
72. 8.4 Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) 183,201
75. 8.4 All About Eve (1950) 30,011
76. 8.4 Modern Times (1936) 29,124
77. 8.4 Gran Torino (2008) 62,146
78. 8.4 Singin' in the Rain (1952) 47,106
79. 8.3 Rebecca (1940) 29,682
80. 8.3 Der Untergang (2004) 65,703
81. 8.3 Metropolis (1927) 32,573
82. 8.3 Some Like It Hot (1959) 57,022
83. 8.3 The Prestige (2006) 160,091
84. 8.3 Amadeus (1984) 82,639
85. 8.3 The Elephant Man (1980) 47,906 or Alternate Link
86. 8.3 The Apartment (1960) 29,959
87. 8.3 Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) 148,991
88. 8.3 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) 137,287
89. 8.3 Nuovo cinema Paradiso (1988) 37,347
90. 8.3 The Wrestler (2008) 54,773
91. 8.3 The Great Dictator (1940) 30,157
92. 8.3 Braveheart (1995) 206,549
93. 8.3 Det sjunde inseglet (1957) 30,130
94. 8.3 No Country for Old Men (2007) 160,138
95. 8.3 Sin City (2005) 214,657
96. 8.3 The Sting (1973) 55,806
97. 8.3 Ladri di biciclette (1948) 21,781
98. 8.3 Back to the Future (1985) 168,415 OR Alternate Link
99. 8.3 Touch of Evil (1958) 27,599
100. 8.3 Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) 28,323
DOWNLOAD LINK
Code:
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=b001dba96eafc38a00d27174b47c665720fe591b3bff4574ce018c8114394287Well this firefox extention says "Data is from University of Colombo School of Computing" and here say you got it from EnsiTip. You have used the same data for your (?) desktop dictionary and also the online dictionary (srilankeeya.com with adsense running) So if you get the data from a GPLed software all others need to be GPL. So under what license did you release these? But no mention about GPL on any of these. Besides, on the desktop version you shamelessly say "Developed by Chatura Dilan" Just disgusting!! Well developers of this database spent years of time to do it and now you have put it into a crappy bit of coding and showing as if you were the author. (If you just Google anyone will find hundreds of much better open source projects) Also you say that Thibus could have copied data from EnSiTip. You must know that Thibus dictionary was first introduced in 1995 and it was the first of its kind. Sundry buggers like ensitip, madhura, chatura, kathura etc. etc. would have been pissing in their pants by that time!
(Kithul gahata negapu ekatath kiyanna deyak thibunalu!)
How it's a crappy code if the whole community get advantage from it and every one thank for developing that software?
The users have freedom to do anything if something distribute under GNU/GPL. even can sell the new versions which i dont like to do.
The desktop version is developed my myself using C#.NET and I get the data from a GNU/GPL project. how it's disgusting to use 'developed by Chatura Dilan Perera'? i dont mentioned that it is copyrighted to me.
And srilankeeya.com, i got data from a GNU/GPL project. Do i need to mention how i got data? is it a violation of GNU/GPL terms?
According to GNU/GPL version 2
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
'When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.'
If you like i can give you the source code of Chatura Dictionary. you can also get the source code of the Firefox toolbar from firefox addon directory.
Now what?
I'm telling this with confidence because I have not done any illegal thing here.
however due to inability of thibus people the data might have been leaked. i dont know the full story about the data who hacked it or is their any alliance.
Every people in Sri Lanka get the advantage out of the data now. and it is also a merit for the people who get years to enter data (as you say) than hide it somewhere with no use of them. i havent heard about the thibus dictionary till you people say.
now the best thing is make that data under GNU/GPL license. so every people will use that data and new products can be introduced to the community from it.
or
if there is illegal thing happen here i'm ready to stop distributing the Chatura dictionary.
The users have freedom to do anything if something distribute under GNU/GPL. even can sell the new versions which i dont like to do.
The desktop version is developed my myself using C#.NET and I get the data from a GNU/GPL project. how it's disgusting to use 'developed by Chatura Dilan Perera'? i dont mentioned that it is copyrighted to me.
And srilankeeya.com, i got data from a GNU/GPL project. Do i need to mention how i got data? is it a violation of GNU/GPL terms?
According to GNU/GPL version 2
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
'When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.'
If you like i can give you the source code of Chatura Dictionary. you can also get the source code of the Firefox toolbar from firefox addon directory.
Now what?
I'm telling this with confidence because I have not done any illegal thing here.
however due to inability of thibus people the data might have been leaked. i dont know the full story about the data who hacked it or is their any alliance.
Every people in Sri Lanka get the advantage out of the data now. and it is also a merit for the people who get years to enter data (as you say) than hide it somewhere with no use of them. i havent heard about the thibus dictionary till you people say.
now the best thing is make that data under GNU/GPL license. so every people will use that data and new products can be introduced to the community from it.
or
if there is illegal thing happen here i'm ready to stop distributing the Chatura dictionary.
Last edited:
thanxxx
Similar threads
