Eranda200 said:
itz a gud idea. wot do u think f your signature m8?
im telling tht the size of space that this images use[in kb]...not abt dimensions.
for xample "omaladithya123 " s sig is abt 66kb it is ok
and mine [the big 1] is abt 29 kb this also ok
ex:----
full detail abt my sigz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code:
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5776/n231x350hh8.jpg
this 1 ==14 KB (14,010 bytes)
Code:
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa297/THILINABUDDHIKA/ILLUTIONZ/HV.jpg
this 1 ==3.7 KB (3,692 bytes)
Code:
http://www.danasoft.com/sig/HIVOLTAG3.jpg
this 1 ==4.9 KB (5,013 bytes)
Code:
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa297/THILINABUDDHIKA/ILLUTIONZ/error.jpg
this 1 ==29 KB (29,077 bytes)
see total size is abt 60kb~~~ this ok
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so i think sigs r not the prob...
onthe other hand all this sigs r not to change time to time and if we login this site more often..this sigs r chached by our browsers..so no need to redownload them again...
im totally considering abt picture which posted inside the posts..as i see those r abt 1MB-3MB or even more.....
think abt dial-up users they hv to wait abt 10 min to load such images....
and im telling u againg,tht sigz r not the main prob...
madai hodak karanna giya...wadinna giya dewale ihe kadan watuna wageiii
jrk